Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for || MR || CRYPTO ||

Channel

|| MR || CRYPTO ||

@signal_crypto_78

Not marked by Telegram, checked 3 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,702subscribers

-180 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002218190114
TypeChannel
Username@signal_crypto_78
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/signal_crypto_78

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

23.2 average views per post against 17,702 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.131%. Across the 6,612 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.86% and 13.5%, with a median of 6.73%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured26 of 26 published in the window (26 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled602
Mature posts only0.151% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers17,702 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 6,612 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 2.86% · p50 6.73% · p75 13.5% · p90 22.5%
Position in cohort0.650th percentile · 1/53 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.163% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 88.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

17,70217,88217,7922 September 2026 — 17,882 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,882 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,868 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,856 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,823 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,799 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,768 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,750 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,727 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,702 subscribers2 September 202619 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 17 days, net -180. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,675–17,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:5817,702-25
17 Sept 2026, 05:1817,727-23
15 Sept 2026, 06:0117,750-18
13 Sept 2026, 11:3817,768-31
11 Sept 2026, 16:3617,799-24
9 Sept 2026, 01:4017,823-33
5 Sept 2026, 16:4017,856-12
3 Sept 2026, 15:5917,868-14
2 Sept 2026, 11:1517,882no change
2 Sept 2026, 11:0117,882first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 30 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.131%
avg views ÷ 17,702 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.2
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held26 (30 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total602
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:03 UTC15 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

کامل خروج بزن تمام نوش جونتون❤️ Close ✅ +800pip ✅ TP 16 ✅ اگر دیده باشی من خودم این معامله رو اصلاً سیو سود نکردم و باهاش تارگت موندم و حساب دو برابر شد البته حساب اصلیم نیست😁 قدرت پلن و استراتژی

2 Sept 2026, 13:54 UTC14 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

هنوز وارد کلاب نشدی ??😎😎 +700pip ✅👌

2 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC14 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

پرواز کرد 😎😎😎 اگه حجم داری سیو کن و ریسک فری کن و دیگه ولش کن❗️ +630pip ✅✅✅

2 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC15 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

نوش برکت ❤️❤️❤️ TP 7 😎 +350pip ✅

2 Sept 2026, 11:57 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

تا الان به نظرت چند تاش اتفاق افتاده ???

2 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTC21 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Look, given the recent events, my analysis regarding the real war is from Aban onwards, but considering that the Republicans and Netanyahu might not win, there might be a principled Chinese groundwork formed before Aban... Dates NOVEMBER 8 December to 11 December 6 Jan to 13 Jan The final goal is up to 10 March... ببینید با توجه به اتفاقات اخیر تحلیل من در مورد جنگ واقعی از آبان به بعد هست اما با توجه به اینکه ممکنه

2 Sept 2026, 09:51 UTC21 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

رئیس بانک مرکزی یعنی همتی نتونست با ارز پاشی در بازارها قیمت‌ها رو کنترل کنه و دلارو به 200 هزار تومان برسونه الان داره پول‌های سنگینی رو وارد بورس می‌کنه که واحدها مثبت بشن که بتونه از اون جهت یه مقدار بازار کنترل پیدا کنه ولی با این حال با هر ریزش و اصلاح قیمت دلار خرید کنید .

2 Sept 2026, 09:47 UTC20 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

The dollar price has reached over 220 thousand tomans!!! And it might start attacks again tonight, heavier sanctions this week will increase more, the charge will increase a lot Soon I'll give you an analysis of what might happen. قیمت دلار به بیش از 220 هزار تومان رسید !!! و ممکنه باز امشب حملات شروع شه سنگین‌تر تحریم‌ها این هفته بیشتر می‌شه فشار خیلی زیاد می‌شه به زودی هم یه تحلیل بهتون میدم که چه اتفاقی ممکنه ب

2 Sept 2026, 05:48 UTC21 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

اینم شکار امروز 😉😏 TP 4 ✅ +200pip ✅ ریسک فری و سیو سود کنید

1 Sept 2026, 19:49 UTC22 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

حملات موشکی ایران از کرمانشاه یزد لرستان کرج و یه سری مناطق دیگه

1 Sept 2026, 19:38 UTC22 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

آغاز حملات موشکی ایران به مناطق ... یه سری موشک‌ها در آسمون ایران فیل شد.

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @signal_crypto_78. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

💛️ فال مهربانوو ️💛
@falmehrbano · 34,307
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 2 September 2026
𝐇𝐚𝐦𝐭𝐭𝐚'𝐬 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐞𝐭 | توسعه فردی
@hamtadehghaan · 22,680
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“|| MR || CRYPTO ||” (@signal_crypto_78), 17,702 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/signal_crypto_78.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.