Инцелы продолжают попускать Педю. Имаджинируйте быть в иерархии общественных отношений даже ниже инцелов. 🙂 @skabr007
custom 52604978012293882409custom 53910613452841515882

Channel
@sigmacringek
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,627subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002399597459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sigmacringek |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sigmacringek |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 1,627 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 1,616 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 1,616 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,568 |
| Reactions total | 215 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
215 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260497801229388240 | 120 | 55.8% | |
| custom 5391249494916488672 | 27 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5391061345284151588 | 23 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5305361753998118196 | 21 | 9.77% | |
| custom 5292221585023867636 | 11 | 5.12% | |
| custom 5260595120893346283 | 8 | 3.72% | |
| custom 5238131604416648696 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| custom 5260547227713029770 | 2 | 0.93% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Инцелы продолжают попускать Педю. Имаджинируйте быть в иерархии общественных отношений даже ниже инцелов. 🙂 @skabr007
custom 52604978012293882409custom 53910613452841515882
#аравудус тарковчанин решил показать контрушникам где их место в мире шутеров и смачно отсосал всем хуец кринжик|подписаться
custom 526049780122938824010
#аравудус #караоке залетарики кринжик|подписаться
custom 52922215850238676361
#аравадус #фасолька неудобно получилось кринжик|подписаться
custom 53912494949164886727custom 52604978012293882405
изрыгающий пиздабольством мэддисон опять напиздел оказывается шевцов не был с девушкой, а был с хесусом и был готов встретится с опущенным мэдом и поговорить раз на раз, но опущенное чмо испугалась гиганта шевцова и слился с встречи гнилое чмо только только в интернете пиздеть и умеет. он буквально ОБОССАЛСЯ встретится с шевцовым💀
custom 526049780122938824018custom 53053617539981181963
#ненормова
custom 539124949491648867210custom 53910613452841515884custom 52605472277130297702custom 52605951208933462832custom 52922215850238676361
#ненормова #шакалова #палитра лесбийское нападение на ненормову кринжик|подписаться
custom 53910613452841515886
#ненормова #шакалова #палитра #секс странные лесби вайбы кринжик|подписаться
#ненормова #донат думаю достаточно пройтись 1 ряд на кладбище, чтобы собрать костюм героя кринжик|подписаться
custom 52604978012293882404custom 52605951208933462833
ладн, я без негатива к эфтаназии, хезе поч он на меня так зол. лично я считаю его своим другом и всегда рад встретить в чатике у любимых стримеров💖 п.с яж не просто так заприметил среди зрителей водолаза эфтаназию, уникальная личность как никак, выделяющееся из толпы☺️
custom 53053617539981181966custom 53910613452841515882custom 52604978012293882401
#эфтаназия да, я шиз. яж выдумал, что эфтаназия ебется в десны с котом васькой с убермаргиналом и бог знает с какими хохлами😼 а еще забавно, что после угроз ежи сармата (на счет про хохлятских взглядов эфтаназии), внезапно босс кванчи высрал пост со сбором донатов для ВС РФ.... ну вот прям случайность🙂главное чаще повторять, что я шиз и врун ну вот ни капли не прижали за транс.яички🙂 п.с он удалил старый акк, пот…
custom 526049780122938824010
#ненормова #шакалова приехала шакалова кринжик|подписаться
custom 52604978012293882401
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sigmacringek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 239,023 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“кринжик” (@sigmacringek), 1,627 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sigmacringek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.