Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto SIGMA

@sigma_inv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

312,472subscribers

-3,113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002065846133
TypeChannel
Username@sigma_inv
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sigma_inv

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

312,472315,585314,028.57 August 2026 — 315,585 subscribers7 August 2026 — 315,585 subscribers8 August 2026 — 315,375 subscribers9 August 2026 — 314,757 subscribers10 August 2026 — 314,046 subscribers11 August 2026 — 313,471 subscribers12 August 2026 — 312,946 subscribers13 August 2026 — 312,472 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3,113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 312,005–316,052 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:27312,472-474
12 Aug 2026, 01:32312,946-525
11 Aug 2026, 04:27313,471-575
10 Aug 2026, 03:03314,046-711
9 Aug 2026, 00:53314,757-618
8 Aug 2026, 03:01315,375-210
7 Aug 2026, 12:45315,585no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:37315,585first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

622 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15324.6%
🔥13221.2%
😁12920.7%
569.00%
🗿345.47%
👏294.66%
🤣152.41%
132.09%
🤯91.45%
🤝71.13%
🫡71.13%
🌚60.965%
🆒40.643%
🍌40.643%
🏆40.643%
🐳40.643%
❤‍🔥30.482%
🎃30.482%
👀30.482%
👎30.482%
2 further kinds40.643%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 622reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2025 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jan 2026, 14:27 UTC≈6,450 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

С новым годом? 🍾

13👍65🏆3🔥3❤‍🔥1

26 Apr 2025, 18:30 UTC≈25,400 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤑 Пока никто не видит, за 10 дней Notcoin вырос на 55% Если вам кажется, что монета из TON экосистемы растет, то просто посмотрите на ее график в более старшем таймфрейме, где видно, что $NOT торгуется в -90% от ATH

😁29👍2423🔥13👏84

26 Apr 2025, 15:23 UTC≈21,700 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😂 Теперь на биржах нужно указывать ваш желаемый заработок, но есть одно НО:

😁13👍11🤣114🎃2🔥2

26 Apr 2025, 11:24 UTC≈19,500 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁CEO TON Foundation купил NTF-подарков себе в профиль, тем самым продолжая свое погружение в комьюнити Подарки 2:0 стикеры

🔥8👍6👏6😁432

26 Apr 2025, 07:59 UTC≈17,400 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥Опубликована токеномика $BUMS Всего будет 10 миллиардов токенов, 45% из которых отведены на аирдроп Но рано радоваться, фарм продлили ещё на 21 день 🔥 — Ждёшь иксы 😁 — Будет бритва

😁17👍9🔥7🤝4🌚3👏2

25 Apr 2025, 18:26 UTC≈11,300 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥Проект BUMS тестируют переводы на кошельки Binance и OKX Листинг на Tier-1 биржах? Думаю, что для тоновской тапалки хотя бы провести листинг — уже огромный успех, что уж тут говорить о Binance Играли в BUMS? 🔥—Да 🗿—Скипнул

🔥24🗿14😁9👍4🫡3🆒2

25 Apr 2025, 14:56 UTC≈8,580 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🐂Коротко о рынке сейчас: За 7 дней BTC вырос на 12,8%, а с последней дипки аж на 25%. Ралли по BTC началось?

🔥14👍10😁4🫡3😴2🌚1

25 Apr 2025, 11:15 UTC≈7,480 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💰Биткоин может взлететь до $200K "Действия Минфина и ФРС (выпуск долга и замедление ужесточения) — это скрытая поддержка экономики" — пишет Артур Хейс Он считает BTC цифровым золотом, поэтому его следующая цель на графике— $200,000

🔥9😁7👏4🗿31🫡1

25 Apr 2025, 07:45 UTC≈6,540 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁Владелец маркетплейса Tonnel подарил Дурову Plush Pepe #1 почти за $50K! Но самый настоящий лайфчендж получит прошлый владелец NFT: его профит составил более 1750Х

👍9👏4😁32🗿1🤯1

24 Apr 2025, 21:27 UTC≈5,890 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Инвесторы все это время неправильно понимали фразу «To the Moon» Полетели? 😄

🔥15👍9😁7🤣2🍌1👎1

24 Apr 2025, 18:19 UTC≈5,380 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⛔️Дожили: дрейнеры и стиллеры крипты теперь продаются в открытом доступе Можно даже взять в аренду — всего $100-300 потребуется, чтобы украсть мои 2 тона

👍10😁54🔥3👀1🤯1

24 Apr 2025, 15:23 UTC≈5,040 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤦‍♂️ PAWS решили не прекращать позориться и анонсировали запуск второго сезона Вот какому здравому человеку прийдёт мысль, после того как его обскамили — снова играть и заносить им деньги? А на самом деле Paws — случай, доказывающий, что не важно, где выходит проект, важно, что это за проект и кто им управляет

👍14😁7🔥53🤝3❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sigma_inv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 790,511 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto SIGMA” (@sigma_inv), 312,472 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sigma_inv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.