8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,190–7,291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 23:01
7,202
-16
23 Aug 2026, 23:47
7,218
-3
20 Aug 2026, 15:38
7,221
-14
17 Aug 2026, 15:53
7,235
-18
14 Aug 2026, 06:05
7,253
-12
10 Aug 2026, 21:01
7,265
-12
7 Aug 2026, 13:38
7,277
-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:17
7,279
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.83%
avg views ÷ 7,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
636
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
24 (14 July 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
7,628
Reactions total
381
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
589 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
323
54.8%
❤
173
29.4%
👍
52
8.83%
⚡
13
2.21%
😁
11
1.87%
custom 5442616732545983624
8
1.36%
🤯
4
0.679%
🤔
3
0.509%
😱
1
0.17%
🤩
1
0.17%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 589reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 24 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sibiryak_tg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Через месяц закончится сезон. Делаю публичную ставку
У дачной ниши есть особенность, о которой я думаю с февраля: она кончается. В апреле человеку не надо объяснять, зачем ему наша экосистема — у него рассада гибнет прямо сейчас, он готов платить сегодня. В ноябре та же проблема существует, но она не горит
Наша подписка живёт полгода. Все эти полгода были сезонными. Зимних данных по ней не существует — в прошлом го…
Как я проверял нишу до того, как в неё зашёл
Мне часто пишут: «Кирилл, посмотри нишу, стоит заходить или нет?»
Отвечаю обычно одинаково — покажу, по каким критериям смотрю сам. Забирайте, это работает в любой теме 👇
Когда мне предложили сад и огород, первая реакция была понятной: дачники, какой инфобиз. Но я прогнал нишу по своему списку, и всё сошлось
1. Есть ли сформированный спрос
Самое дорогое в инфобизе — о…
Как устроена наша товарная линейка: от 2 200 до 50 000
Обещал разобрать — разбираю. Это то, что мы собирали полгода и что в итоге дало разницу между входом за 2 200 и клиентом, который приносит 17 700
Сразу главный принцип, из которого всё выросло: каждая ступень должна давать человеку результат сама по себе, то есть решать конкретную задачу целиком. Если ступень не даёт результата — следующую человек не купит. И н…
Полгода как я продюсирую школу в нише сад-огород. Вот что имеем
В феврале мне говорили две вещи: «там нет денег» и «дачники не покупают дорогие продукты»
Полгода прошло, можно отчитаться нормально
3 500+ человек купили клуб. Школа заработала больше 30 млн. Последние месяцы держим 5–6 млн ежемесячно. Рентабельность от 55%
На эту цифру я и смотрю в первую очередь. Выручкой сегодня никого не удивишь — можно сделать …
Пишу это скорее как заметку для себя.
Последние несколько дней постоянно ловлю себя на мысли, что прямо сейчас проживаю очень интересный этап жизни.
Похожее ощущение было лет в 18, когда я только переехал в Москву. Тогда внутри было огромное желание зарабатывать и достигать. Я мог работать с утра до ночи и вообще не замечать времени.
Сейчас чувствую примерно то же самое.
Последние несколько месяцев многое изменил…
Как создавать, контент который формирует доверие?
Сегодня хочу подсветить очень важную зону, которой обычно уделяется мало внимания — контент-маркетинг и выстраивание доверия с аудиторией
Я вижу большую проблему. Привлекаем новых людей, сводим на автоворонки, автомарафоны, вебинары, а конверсии либо слабо отрабатывают, либо почти не отрабатывают
Почему? Паттерн людей для принятия решения о покупке поменялся. Неваж…
Как подготовить свой канал в MAX к привлечению трафика и запускам. Часть 2
В прошлом посте разобрали упаковку канала и контент-маркетинг.
Сегодня переходим к следующим важным момента
Ключевой принцип: когда вы начинаете покупать платный трафик и выстраивать модель продаж— необходимо выстроить два элемента
1. Сбор базы
Не делайте просто ставку на то чтобы привлекать подписчиков и работать только с ними. Обязатель…
Мой вектор на следующие 3 года
Друзья, записал для вас подкаст, где я ответил на ключевой вопрос — что я думаю относительно рынка, не планирую ли менять нишу, и что планирую делать на протяжении следующих 3 лет.
В подкасте разобрали: подписочные модели, мысли по международке, а также хайповое направление с affiliate-маркетингом.
Обязательно всем к прослушиванию 🔥
Как подготовить свой канал в MAX к привлечению трафика и запускам. Часть 1
Начинаем серию постов на тему того, как использовать MAX и выстраивать там систему продаж. Следующие две недели буду посвящать именно этой теме.
Проведу разборы, выпущу обучающие материалы, чтобы вы могли свободно использовать эти инструменты для роста своего проекта
Поясню важный момент.
Большинство проектов будут сливать платный трафик, …
Больше половины из вас не используют MAX в своих проектах
Не делают там запуски, не привлекают аудиторию
Я считаю, что можно по-разному относиться к MAX, например, бойкотировать и принципиально его не скачивать.
Но если ваша аудитория преимущественно женщины 40+ и вы строите массовый проект — вам в любом случае необходимо использовать этот инструмент
Последние новости касаемо Телеграма говорят нам об одном — MAX …
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @sibiryak_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Используете автоворонки для окупаемости платного трафика?
Да41%
Нет59%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дмитрий Кокорев | Инвестиции @kokorevinvest · 101,495 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кирилл Сибиряк” (@sibiryak_tg), 7,202 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sibiryak_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.