Channel
@shww33
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,262subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004342408331 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shww33 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shww33 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 1,262 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 1,260 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 1,250 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 1,235 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 1,235 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 138 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
《反馈报告》 会员ID： ⭕️约会时间： 以下评价1~10打分 （差评：1~3，中评：4~6，好评：7~9，无可挑剔：10） ⭕️人照相符度：8 妆后9分 ⭕️颜值评分：9 ⭕️服务态度：10 ⭕️服务水平：9 ⭕️整体评价：9 注：⭕️为必填项 评语（选填）：颜值很能打，妹子小小一只，身材很好，没摸出假体那种感觉，哪哪都软软的。服务是我这个年轻司机遇到的天花板，口活很好，丝毫没有齿感。上位体力也很到位，不像以前遇到的动几下就喊累，运动过程情绪价值拉满，搞完聊天也很舒服。问题妹子不是很润，多半是套套的问题，怪自己这次出门急没带自己习惯的。最后，萝莉是没有出路的，对比下来萝莉的服务真的差，下次我要约个全自动榨汁机。
以下评价1~10打分 （差评：1~3，中评：4~6，好评：7~9，无可挑剔：10） ⭕️人照相符度：妹妹是学生用的驾照， ⭕️颜值评分：10 ⭕️服务态度：10 ⭕️服务水平：10 ⭕️整体评价：9.9少给0.1怕妹妹骄傲 注：⭕️为必填项 评语（选填）：初见小鹿，是在酒店大厅，她身着一件白色的棉衣，她人如其名她就像一只小鹿，优雅而自由，让人忍不住想要保护她的这份可爱与纯真。一双眼睛清澈得像是山间的小溪，闪烁着对世界的好奇和期待。急不可待我赶忙上去拉起妹妹的手直奔房间。 因为是第一次，我有点手足无措，小鹿看出了我的紧张，主动找了话题试图暖场。她轻声细语地询问我最近的生活，她的声音柔和而温暖，就像春日里和煦的阳光。渐渐地我开始放松下来，见我不在紧张，小鹿便邀请我一起去卫生间洗漱，冲洗完毕，回到床上的妹妹突然一口含住住了我的把柄，让我有点措手不及，妹妹的口腔温柔而充满爱意，让我感到如同被春日阳光拥抱一般温暖。她的气息里夹带着淡淡的花…
#上海 子非鱼 5⬆️ 小鱼 #静安 #独家 --- 在读上戏学院 准签约嘉行旗下艺人----- 気質ホワイトカラー • 上海 上海 舞蹈基本功扎实 • 高级脸 清纯洋气 天然🈚️整 可甜可盐 • 你的小可爱(03年） 特别温柔 • 裸高166 罩杯C ·成都女孩
以下评价1~10打分 （差评：1~3，中评：4~6，好评：7~9，无可挑剔：10） ⭕️人照相符度：假照 ⭕️颜值评分：9 ⭕️服务态度：10 ⭕️服务水平：10 ⭕️整体评价：10 注：⭕️为必填项 评语（选，脸整的有点过，御姐网红， 但是非常好评，年轻5岁会死在她身上那种，我愿称为最好，非常主动，身材巨好，胸大，香香的，口和做技术高超，懂得让人兴奋，感觉开万的水平，5纯捡漏
#上海 子非鱼 家5外W Nate #静安 高177🐻e 超级雪白 不白赔💦 真实06年 情商满分 巴掌脸筷子腿完美比例 时尚洋气 同城可随时见本人 可视频无惧任何挑剔🉑
#上海 小红娘 5️⃣⬆️ #只外出 洋子 上海177E硬5超模 意大利马兰欧尼（lstituto Marangoni）学院伦敦分院毕业 穿着大牌 时尚程度高 天然然高级脸 可全程英语交流 2024上海时装周观秀嘉宾 #硬5 #御姐 #六九 #舌吻 #无纹身 #登记代开
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @shww33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 598,865 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海外围/5k每日更新” (@shww33), 1,262 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shww33.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.