Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -4,874. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,554–22,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 08:29
15,933
-3
5 Nov 2026, 13:07
15,936
-2
4 Nov 2026, 14:28
15,938
-13
3 Nov 2026, 13:48
15,951
-6
2 Nov 2026, 12:38
15,957
-9
1 Nov 2026, 12:47
15,966
-18
31 Oct 2026, 09:21
15,984
-15
30 Oct 2026, 09:45
15,999
-9
29 Oct 2026, 08:59
16,008
+4,986
28 Oct 2026, 07:10
11,022
-7
27 Oct 2026, 08:49
11,029
-9
26 Oct 2026, 10:06
11,038
-33
25 Oct 2026, 08:28
11,071
-25
24 Oct 2026, 08:14
11,096
-41
23 Oct 2026, 09:39
11,137
-18
22 Oct 2026, 07:35
11,155
-19
21 Oct 2026, 04:35
11,174
-14
20 Oct 2026, 01:37
11,188
-12
18 Oct 2026, 23:50
11,200
-12
17 Oct 2026, 21:21
11,212
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 29 March 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.21%
avg views ÷ 15,933 subscribers
Avg views / post
989
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.607%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held
5 (29 March 2025 – 25 October 2026)
Views total
989
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
9
Videos
7
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
9s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6
50.0%
👍
4
33.3%
🔥
2
16.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2025 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
〖艺名〗：#诗诗ㅤㅤ
〖位置〗：#徐汇区 #宜山路
〖课费〗：#1000p #1500ppㅤ
〖描述〗：#168cm #46kg #Aㅤ
〖私聊〗：@shishihaofan0130
〖双向〗：@shishihaofan0130_bot
〖标签〗：#舌吻 #鸳鸯浴 #水中萧 #嫩妹 #可拍视频 #可定制场景
📬提交报告│🔗一键关注│💌联系管理
The content of this post and the chat history constitute a lawful exercise of rights, do not violate Telegram's rules, and do not constitute prohibited content in any.
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @shwddhhkb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@shwddhhkb edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 November 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海武道大会花魁榜单” (@shwddhhkb), 15,933 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shwddhhkb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
