Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 上海武道大会报告榜单

Channel

上海武道大会报告榜单

@shwddhbgb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,123subscribers

-1,065 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002655739311
TypeChannel
Username@shwddhbgb
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shwddhbgb

Growth

26,12327,18826,655.56 August 2026 — 27,188 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,188 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,159 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,982 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,919 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,817 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,613 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,535 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,419 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,364 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,236 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,123 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -1,065. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,963–27,348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:0426,123-113
16 Aug 2026, 17:2226,236-128
14 Aug 2026, 23:5726,364-55
13 Aug 2026, 15:0726,419-116
12 Aug 2026, 14:1526,535-78
11 Aug 2026, 13:5326,613-204
10 Aug 2026, 17:1626,817-102
9 Aug 2026, 17:2126,919-63
8 Aug 2026, 19:5126,982-177
7 Aug 2026, 19:2327,159-29
6 Aug 2026, 22:3027,188no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:2527,188first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.23%
avg views ÷ 26,123 subscribers
Avg views / post
584
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.168%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held28 (17 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total14,592
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC545 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-16 【老师】:冰冰 【留名】:Codm666 【人照】:9.9 【颜值】:9.5 【身材】:8.5 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.48 【过程】:约了ls下午的课,进门人照一致,个子高挑,年轻漂亮有魅力。脱衣蛮有料,前凸后翘,皮肤白皙,胸大概C,摸起来软软的,妹妹是蝴蝶户型,毛量少,抽插观感不错,另外口活很好,搭配精致面容和nice身材,赏心悦目,搞得鸡儿邦邦硬,而且身体柔软,每个姿势都很舒服,最后美美起飞。有一说一,ls颜值确实能打,情绪价值也够,所以年少不知精子贵,要给就给好的妹妹。

14 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC560 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-14 【老师】:小初 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:8.8 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9.5 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.05 【过程】:出击小初老师,人照算相符,身材棒,胸很挺,天然大胸。房间一直保持得干净整洁,氛围温馨。老师服务非常用心,从前戏到结束都贴心照顾对方的感受。把控节奏强,前戏给的足,口活从上到下时间特别长,感觉都要爆出来的节奏了。不会敷衍了事!床感顶级,身体柔软又有弹性,抱起来特别舒服。床技方面她既主动又极具天赋,唇舌湿热灵活,吸得又深又紧;下面更是销魂,会主动用力夹吸,像一张贪婪的小嘴般紧紧裹住,节奏感一流,逼水多,又滑又热,随着激烈的撞击不断发出淫靡的水声。浪叫销魂那种灵魂都被吸走的极致快感,简直让人欲仙欲死、难以忘怀。 整体体验极致满足,既有清纯漂亮的外表和丰腴身材带来的视觉享受,又有满满的情绪价值和顶级床技带来的双重快乐,绝对是让人念念不忘的优质老师。

12 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC581 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-12 【老师】:温迪咖啡 【留名】:Roy 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.33 【过程】: 兄弟们已经多次推荐,终于有空能约上妹妹,早早来到课室,开门妹妹果然跟频道一样,标准嫩妹,年轻很有生命力。跟妹妹聊聊天,自然的去洗澡,上床。做爱很自然,妹妹很认真的福利,查抽插反应很真实,正面看着视觉冲击感很强,今天鸡儿很敏感,最后实在忍不住了,跟妹妹在舌吻中尽情释放。完事之后跟妹妹有说有笑聊了半天才不舍得离去,赞,值的返吃的好妹妹

12 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC567 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-12 【老师】:慧蕾 【留名】:LP 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.83 【过程】:老小区 交通方便,服务态度很好,比较健谈。

10 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC570 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🎖精英车评🎖 【时间】:2026-08-10 【老师】:茶冻冻 【留名】:简单次 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:中了工兵 约好时间就出击 到地是个小公寓 环境不错 上楼进屋 交水费开始洗澡 ls帮忙洗澡 出来擦干上床服务 三点式加胸推 最后cjs出货

9 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC578 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-09 【老师】:慧蕾 【留名】:塞尔卡 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:小区好找,私密性强,安全,小姐姐高跟鞋,大长腿,人照一致。帮洗澡,挑衣服,课表服务都有,服务细致,人很健谈,业务熟练,口活超棒,不催,皮肤滑嫩,手感好,够骚,非常满意,期待二刷

8 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC579 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-08 【老师】:语夕 【留名】:ronkh 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:老师是我喜欢的类型,可欲可纯,皮肤白滑,交完水费我俩一起去鸳鸯戏水,褪去衣物才发现,老师的衣品真不错,恨不得直接就干,身材没话说,身上那股骚劲让我的弟弟,瞬间浴火焚身,洗完上床,老师主动贴贴,从上到下亲了一遍,看着她那性感的身体,一边含住我的鸡巴,一边抚摸她那随时要出水的阴唇,我迫不及待的来了第一次,女上姿势,插进去那一分钟,感觉老师的爱液就是专门等我来操她的,第一次没几下就出水了,中间我俩也相互撩骚,老师挺健谈的,第二次老师更加主动,先是舔我咪咪玩我鸡巴,最后又直接含住在嘴里舌头打转,让我马上又有了反应,直接起身后入式,第二次时间比较久换了很多姿势就不一一赘述了,老师还是很不错的性价比也行,唯一美中不足的就是不能舌,不过老师服务内容还是挺多的

7 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC591 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-07 【老师】:可心 【留名】:Haldi 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:身材很棒,长相清纯美丽邻家女孩👧筷子腿,皮肤白,态度好,口活好,配合度极高,教室环境好,方便进出,老师的下面很紧,水也多,做起来舒服。

1

6 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC588 viewsread 17 August 2026

比我想象中还要完美,漂亮,我的审美很挑,但见到乔妹妹长相几乎排除很多顾虑,好看、身材娇小、热情、温柔,全占!服务不催,舌吻不催,特别是看着无毛小内内操起来得劲,这个妹妹真的好看,紧致的五官挑不出毛病,情绪价值拉满,月底再见。https://t.me/shwddhzyb/946

5 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC591 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-05 【老师】:慧蕾 【留名】:Roy 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:老师科室位置很好找,开门见老师穿的黑丝超短裙,付完水费跟老师一起共浴,共浴完回到床上老师就开始给我一系列服务,老师的舌漫很不错,整得我全身酥酥麻麻的很是享受,特别是老师的口活简直一绝,老师服务特别好,强烈推荐友友去体验一下,开5无脑冲!

3 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC589 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-08-03 【老师】:林妹妹 【留名】:sn 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:总结来说是第二次出击了 见面还是态度很好,我喝了一瓶无糖的可乐,整体服务也很棒,和之前没有区别。今天吃的时间更长了,给我弄的快要射了要开动爱爱模式

3 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC592 viewsread 17 August 2026

今天过来徐汇办点事,提前预约了林妹妹PP位,本人跟视频有个9分像,身材体型各方面都很棒,反正确实很大 ,腰臀黄金比例,性格开朗,各方面都很完美。

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @shwddhbgb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“上海武道大会报告榜单” (@shwddhbgb), 26,123 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shwddhbgb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.