Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 苏州白金翰 选妃图册

Channel

苏州白金翰 选妃图册

@shuyuegexusnfei

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

17,206subscribers

+3,312 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002960372095
TypeChannel
Username@shuyuegexusnfei
Description频道https://t.me/suzhoubaijinhang 约课私聊 @E2j01cc 机器人 @ShuyuegeBot 群https://t.me/suzhoubaijinhanfuhuoban 选妃 https://t.me/shuyuegexusnfei
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/shuyuegexusnfei

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,89417,20615,55030 August 2026 — 13,894 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,928 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,965 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,003 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,031 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,089 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,122 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,237 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,451 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,501 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,530 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,605 subscribers26 September 2026 — 15,041 subscribers4 October 2026 — 15,523 subscribers8 October 2026 — 15,806 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,108 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,210 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,211 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,213 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,250 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,257 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,282 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,294 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,317 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,316 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,320 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,397 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,456 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,525 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,595 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,687 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,708 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,781 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,838 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,925 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,992 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,045 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,145 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,206 subscribers30 August 20266 November 2026
39 measurements spanning 68 days, net +3,312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,397–17,703 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 13:5817,206+61
5 Nov 2026, 15:2717,145+100
4 Nov 2026, 15:1917,045+53
3 Nov 2026, 12:4616,992+67
2 Nov 2026, 14:3916,925+87
1 Nov 2026, 14:3916,838+57
31 Oct 2026, 12:2816,781+73
30 Oct 2026, 10:3016,708+21
29 Oct 2026, 11:4616,687+92
28 Oct 2026, 09:0616,595+70
27 Oct 2026, 10:5116,525+69
26 Oct 2026, 07:4616,456+59
25 Oct 2026, 05:3516,397+77
24 Oct 2026, 06:0616,320+4
23 Oct 2026, 03:1616,316-1
22 Oct 2026, 01:0116,317+23
20 Oct 2026, 19:5016,294+12
19 Oct 2026, 19:1916,282+25
18 Oct 2026, 16:5616,257+7
17 Oct 2026, 13:5616,250first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.21%
avg views ÷ 17,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.076%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held42 (26 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total15,543
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
208
Videos
63
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 30s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1583.3%
🤮316.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC160 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

虎丘 少妇 521号 身高170 体重92 胸围D➕ 普拉提教练 蜜桃臀大蜜天花板,极致腰臀比,前凸后翘,皮肤超级光滑细腻 一线天 敏感 水💦多多 活好!活好!活好!!! 长相御姐冷艳,气质大牌 遇见他入春水映梨花 🉑🐍🉑🦞 5T全能选手(🤲🦶🐻🐬🦅) 499价格 (60分钟不限次数) #东方美#化流顶流

6 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC263 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @xiangchengqujishiPhoto

相城新人 (00号) 08年嫩妹 身高166 体重110 胸围C+ (舌吻69看人) (追求服务顶的选其它) (已开智 常规四推都会了)

❤1

3 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ksbjhspaPhoto

昆山新人(家速度) V1号 08年 168净身高 体重125 胸围D 项目:🉑🐍 🉑5T 🉑摸 🉑舔🥚➕🉑棒棒糖🍭➕🉑🦞➕🉑摸小豆豆 介绍:主打高颜值 美女主播 颜值与身材完美并存 嫩妹音 可甜可御💦超多 粉嫩多汁 甜美脸御姐风格 499价格

3 Nov 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,520 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

苏州虎丘新人 111号 (520小姐妹)07年嫩妹抖音小网红博主 性格阳光有趣开朗e人服务至上积极配合女友型活好身材火辣冷白皮真D杯 刚下海短暂兼职 🉑🐍🉑🦞 5T全能选手(🤲🦶🐻🐬🦅) 499价格 (60分钟不限次数)

❤2

2 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,550 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

苏州虎丘 新人 520号 杭州妹妹新来苏州 07顶美嫩妹下海💗💗 身高166体重98🐻D+ 女友感拉满 ,大长腿,皮肤嫩的出水,服务优秀,配合度高,情绪价值满满的 🉑🐍🉑🦞 5T全能选手(🤲🦶🐻🐬🦅) 499价格 (60分钟不限次数)

❤2

2 Nov 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @jxnhxfPhoto

浙江嘉兴 小雅「嫩妹嫩妹」 08/166/45/C 🉑跳舞 极品身材妹妹舞姿曼妙 🉑🦞(看人) 🉑摸小豆豆 骚辣嫩妹,服务巨主动,魔鬼身材,高颜女友体验感

1 Nov 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,800 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yqxfspaPhoto

园区新人 91号 99年 身高163 体重90 胸围B+ (舌吻看人)➕69➕舔蛋 (4推)(苗族妹妹回归-本人脸小精致)

31 Oct 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

吴江新人 711号 (舞蹈老师兼职)超级王牌🔥 资料 04年 身高 168 体重 48 胸围 B+ 配合度超高 5.0T大排量,👋🦶🐳🐻🦅,臀推一绝,🉑😚,🉑摸小豆豆,🉑69🦞海鲜管饱,🉑飞行棋,🉑果冻🐉,🉑自选🧥,🉑🐟🛁。骚的一批,水汪汪,服务主推,单身多年需大哥调教 499价格

31 Oct 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

吴江新人 611号 (萝莉新人) 资料:03年 身高156 体重45 胸围C+ 🉑亲🐍🉑🦞🉑助🚿🉑摸小豆豆 5T(🐬 🐻 👋 🦶 🎵 )拉满 服务系好妹妹。主动热情❤️性感御姐,身材完美,配合度情商极高!! 气质明艳,身体软嫩,小🐱属性的她,特别喜欢叫你主人,羞涩的话语中透露着说不出的万种骚情,待你仔细品味 499价格

❤2

29 Oct 2026, 13:43 UTC≈2,190 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Forwarded from @chsngqiaoVideo

吴中长桥3号08年 小骚b 155净身高 胸围E bbw(介意的勿选) 舌吻➕舔蛋➕69 ➕裸毒龙(金牌🎖全能老师)可轻微sm+100 白金瀚最骚的一个没有之一

❤1

29 Oct 2026, 04:47 UTC≈1,960 views0 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Forwarded from @ksbjhspaPhoto

昆山(越洋国际)新人 v24号 🉑类型:08系嫩妹开工!颜值系,简单4t服务,身高162,体重92,胸围,b,颜值身材都OK!刚下海,服务项目可调教,清纯可爱,萌萌的学生妹类型,可爱系萌妹首选!刚下海,兄弟们轻柔调教,身娇体柔易推倒!

2 Sept 2026, 10:35 UTC319 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @chsngqiaoPhoto

吴中长桥新人 71号 08年 身高170 体重95 胸围C (舌吻+69-看人)(要服务 尺度的跳过)

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @shuyuegexusnfei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @shuyuegexusnfei as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“苏州白金翰 选妃图册” (@shuyuegexusnfei), 17,206 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shuyuegexusnfei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.