Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shuvo Paul

Channel

Shuvo Paul

@shuvopaul78

On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,510subscribers

+7,566 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002052028883
TypeChannel
Username@shuvopaul78
DescriptionHey 👋
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shuvopaul78

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

19,000 average views per post against 24,510 subscribers — an engagement rate of 77.7%. Across the 7,876 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.46% and 14.4%, with a median of 6.57%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (2 August 2026 1 September 2026)
Posts measured20 of 20 published in the window (1 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled380,893
Mature posts only81.7% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers24,510 measured 31 August 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 7,876 channels · p10 0.683% · p25 2.46% · p50 6.57% · p75 14.4% · p90 26.1%
Position in cohort99.238th percentile · 11.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.031% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 1 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,94424,51020,72711 August 2026 — 16,944 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,946 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,997 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,054 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,170 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,226 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,310 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,803 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,342 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,747 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,032 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,414 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,099 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,038 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,539 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,969 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,451 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,880 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,327 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,510 subscribers11 August 202631 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 21 days, net +7,566. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,809–25,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 14:3324,510+183
30 Aug 2026, 15:0524,327+447
29 Aug 2026, 14:1923,880+429
28 Aug 2026, 14:2723,451+482
27 Aug 2026, 16:2522,969+430
26 Aug 2026, 19:5222,539+1,501
25 Aug 2026, 17:2321,038+939
24 Aug 2026, 17:4520,099+685
23 Aug 2026, 02:3719,414+382
21 Aug 2026, 18:0519,032+285
20 Aug 2026, 14:4218,747+405
19 Aug 2026, 16:1218,342+539
18 Aug 2026, 14:0717,803+493
17 Aug 2026, 13:5417,310+84
16 Aug 2026, 05:2417,226+56
14 Aug 2026, 17:5417,170+116
13 Aug 2026, 08:2617,054+57
12 Aug 2026, 10:4816,997+51
11 Aug 2026, 08:4716,946+2
11 Aug 2026, 00:4516,944first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.7%
avg views ÷ 24,510 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,000
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.279%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held37 (3 April 20261 September 2026)
Views total380,893
Reactions total1,062
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 09:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
114
Videos
23
Links
119

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,966 reactions across 36 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
90430.5%
👎55218.6%
👍36912.4%
🙏2297.72%
🤬1525.12%
💩1083.64%
🖕1033.47%
😢862.90%
🥰581.96%
🤡541.82%
🤣431.45%
🤮411.38%
😁361.21%
🔥351.18%
👏280.944%
😭270.91%
🍌220.742%
140.472%
💯140.472%
🙈140.472%
13 further kinds772.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,966 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC403 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

New Video- https://youtube.com/watch?v=lkbl6ejOqKg&si=JdQM3XDP9PXBgX9v

28 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC≈8,840 views46 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Good Morning 🌞🫡

18🤮17👎9🍌2

26 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈13,300 views28 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Video Dekho 🔥 yt.openinapp.co/7n1yevu

🔥12👎96🥰1

25 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC≈19,800 views646 reactionsread 1 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍279👎128💩8150🖕27😁22👏1614

25 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC≈19,700 views140 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Good Morning 🤍🫡

79🤮17🖕14🥰13👍10👎7

22 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈23,400 views18 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Ride Vlog 💀🔥- yt.openinapp.co/aebzx

👎108

19 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈28,000 views13 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

New Dubai 🇦🇪 Vlog :- yt.openinapp.co/pz1t5

11👎2

18 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC≈29,400 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

New Vlog 😎🔥 yt.openinapp.co/rj23xii

3

16 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈30,800 views51 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

CAPCUT 😎🔥:- https://www.apkmirror.com/apk/bytedance-pte-ltd/capcut/capcut-video-editor-19-1-0-release/capcut-video-editor-19-1-0-android-apk-download/

38👎7🥰6

16 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈27,400 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

New Vlogs - yt.openinapp.co/rm1al

1

14 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈27,000 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

DUBAI ROOM TOUR VLOG -yt.openinapp.co/xopgwev

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @shuvopaul78. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 750,143 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Jayanta Bhai
@jayantabhai06 · 102,486
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 16 August 2026
NEET JEE CBSE Biology Chemistry
@neet_jee_cbse_biology_chemistry1 · 37,546
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shuvo Paul” (@shuvopaul78), 24,510 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shuvopaul78.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.