Video message, posted without a caption

Channel
Shusterzon
@shusterzon24
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001608623505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shusterzon24 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shusterzon24 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 161 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 164 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 166 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 166 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 66.7%
- avg views ÷ 161 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 107
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.571%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (3 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 537 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 04s
- Average length
- 2m 02s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 76.5% | |
| custom 5247217994278388482 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5355281110907493901 | 2 | 11.8% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
MILV сухое укрепляющее масло для ногтей Marshmallow оказалось очень приятным 👎 Быстро впитывается, не оставляет жирности и красиво подсвечивает кожу мелким шиммером. Кутикула после него выглядят более ухоженно. И запах очень классный -сладкий, как маршмеллоу 💅 Беру не в первый раз, купила моей маме и маме парня🥹 https://ozon.ru/t/j7h3sZY
❤1
Делаем дальше такую рубрику?
- Да91%
- Нет9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Делюсь с вами ещё раз спреем для волос от миксит🩷 MIXIT Restart 15 в 1 -волосы после него гладкие, легче расчесываются и не пушатся. Ещё нравится, что он вообще не утяжеляет волосы и придаёт такой ухоженный вид🩷 Беру себе уже не в первый раз🤭 https://ozon.ru/t/LCtMw8l
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Нужна кому нибудь кофеварка новая? Скидку сделаю, за 4500 отдам
✨ Хочешь просыпаться уже красивой, не тратя время на тушь? Приглашаю на наращивание ресниц! 💖 ✔️ Натуральный и выразительный взгляд ✔️ Индивидуальный подбор длины, изгиба и объёма ✔️ Комфортная процедура ✔️ Стойкий результат до 4–6 недель Работаю аккуратно, с использованием качественных материалов и с заботой о комфорте каждой клиентки. 📍 Запись в личные сообщения. Количество мест ограничено, чтобы уделить максим…
❤1
Девочки, у кого аэрогриль, посоветуйте 🥹
Это ещё не всё, постепенно буду выкладывать🥹
❤5custom 52472179942783884821custom 53552811109074939011
Съездили на Матрёшки и наконец-то выплеснули кучу эмоций в парке аттракционов. 🎢❤️ Были в комнате страха (1 фото). Внутри снимать было нельзя. На самом деле страшно не было, но было очень напряжённо, потому что в правилах было написано, что актёров бить нельзя. 😂 Мы всю дорогу ждали, что кто-нибудь выскочит, но в итоге актёров там не оказалось. Потом заглянули в зеркальную комнату- было прикольно и местами даже сло…
❤5custom 52472179942783884821custom 53552811109074939011
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @shusterzon24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делаем дальше такую рубрику?
- Да91%
- Нет9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shusterzon” (@shusterzon24), 161 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shusterzon24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.