Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 水水高质量和平/三角洲授权号(白菜价)

Channel

水水高质量和平/三角洲授权号(白菜价)

@shuishui8186

3 usernames

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

6,404subscribers

+270 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002825982434
TypeChannel
Usernames@GBLNB6 @shuishui8186 @sjzss88
Created11 June 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held20
On Telegramt.me/shuishui8186

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@shuishui8186 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@LNN0731
held 21 August 2026 – 21 August 2026

Growth

16,4043,202.511 August 2026 — 6,134 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,131 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,083 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,071 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,049 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,027 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,004 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,979 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,927 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,897 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,861 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,832 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,776 subscribers29 September 2026 — 1 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,638 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,723 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,078 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,202 subscribers14 November 2026 — 6,404 subscribers11 August 202614 November 2026
20 measurements spanning 95 days, net +270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 14:226,404+202
10 Nov 2026, 19:066,202+124
6 Nov 2026, 20:056,078+355
4 Nov 2026, 03:055,723+85
3 Nov 2026, 10:225,638+5,637
29 Sept 2026, 16:191-5,775
25 Sept 2026, 21:415,776-56
17 Sept 2026, 06:585,832-29
13 Sept 2026, 15:185,861-36
9 Sept 2026, 16:375,897-30
3 Sept 2026, 23:175,927-52
31 Aug 2026, 07:435,979-25
28 Aug 2026, 00:286,004-23
25 Aug 2026, 07:156,027-22
22 Aug 2026, 17:236,049-22
21 Aug 2026, 09:156,071-12
19 Aug 2026, 08:396,083-9
16 Aug 2026, 04:076,092-39
12 Aug 2026, 19:046,131-3
11 Aug 2026, 20:316,134first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 11 June 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.625%
avg views ÷ 6,404 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.0
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held22 (11 June 2025 – 14 November 2026)
Views total280
Reactions total60
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,434 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤59341.4%
🥰39927.8%
😭18012.6%
👍1158.02%
👎553.84%
🤡493.42%
🤬201.39%
🖕120.837%
🍌60.418%
🤔30.209%
👌10.07%
👏10.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,434 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2025 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC40 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026

授权号的上号率99.5%基本上百分百都能上

👍9

18 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC747 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

瓦妈更新扳机(通过内核实现的板机与市面常见的不同给你极致的体验),还有锁小球 绘图调节射线上下调整,还有手持图片显示、血量显示还有新英雄的绘制呀,新手枪什么的,图片文字 然后优化自瞄@全体成员

❤4👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @shuishui8186. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@shuishui8186 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 November 2026
Most recent edit
14 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“水水高质量和平/三角洲授权号(白菜价)” (@shuishui8186), 6,404 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shuishui8186.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.