Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 匿名树洞九江

Channel

匿名树洞九江

@shudongjj

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

825subscribers

+230 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003937811820
TypeChannel
Username@shudongjj
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shudongjj

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5958257108 August 2026 — 595 subscribers8 August 2026 — 595 subscribers8 August 2026 — 601 subscribers15 August 2026 — 648 subscribers21 August 2026 — 699 subscribers28 August 2026 — 749 subscribers3 September 2026 — 766 subscribers12 September 2026 — 825 subscribers8 August 202612 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 35 days, net +230. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 561–860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 13:15825+59
3 Sept 2026, 19:38766+17
28 Aug 2026, 12:26749+50
21 Aug 2026, 16:07699+51
15 Aug 2026, 03:46648+47
8 Aug 2026, 07:59601+6
8 Aug 2026, 03:16595no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:32595first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC123 viewsread 8 August 2026

讲话都不过脑子 不行就把脑子捐了吧 一群大傻逼

7 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC124 viewsread 8 August 2026

都 TM别玩 逼事多 嫌这个嫌那个 你自己去找便宜的啊

7 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC128 viewsread 8 August 2026

你们每去一次92 95 98群主都有提成,他巴不得你们天天去

7 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC129 viewsread 8 August 2026

微胖等于坦克,不露脸等于颜值一般,年轻基本服务差,不能舌吻不能69不建议去,都不会的嫩妹事特别多,群主收钱,只要有人说老师一点不好先喷后踢

7 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC132 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

问个吉拔毛天天问这个行不行,那喜欢什么样的也不说,你要服务还是要最后哆嗦那一下,人家老师课表服务内容身材照片写清楚了,去了体验完了不行下次就不去

7 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC136 viewsread 8 August 2026

新老师,别问,去看看不就行了,不满意转头就走

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shudongjj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“匿名树洞九江” (@shudongjj), 825 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shudongjj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.