Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

树洞频道

@shudongcomin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,484subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001612196937
TypeChannel
Username@shudongcomin
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shudongcomin

Growth

8,4848,5048,4947 August 2026 — 8,504 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,504 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,491 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,484 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,481–8,507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:058,484-7
10 Aug 2026, 18:278,491-13
7 Aug 2026, 12:548,504no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:168,504first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3,515 reactions across 13 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱92726.4%
😭56416.0%
🙏52314.9%
🍾37910.8%
😢2226.32%
1744.95%
🤣1634.64%
🫡1373.90%
👍892.53%
🤩742.11%
🤬561.59%
🤮461.31%
🎉401.14%
🤗190.541%
👏160.455%
🤯160.455%
🌭130.37%
💔130.37%
😈90.256%
🤨90.256%
6 further kinds260.74%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,515reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2023 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2026, 15:31 UTC≈9,770 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

据悉,大陆监管方采取了极为严苛的“连坐制”以打击“翻墙”行为,即若发现某一云服务商的机房中有任意ip有着疑似“翻墙”网络特征,则该机房下所有ip均被连坐拔网线。在此高压政策下,存活的“翻墙”服务提供商越来越少。

🤯12🤬7🍾3🤣3😱32😍1

5 Apr 2026, 14:03 UTC≈9,170 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#comment 近期大陆当局对于“翻墙”的打击力度已然达到了互联网长城建立以来前所未有的程度,不免让人联想此举可能是大陆当局为了某些行动提前埋下伏笔,至于后续如何,只能继续观察。 另在此提醒,若各位洞友们仍在内地使用“翻墙”服务的,最好避免长期订阅同一服务,使用月付等方式以减少经济损失。若却有不可替代的国际互联网需求,建议多持

🤨96👍1

5 Apr 2026, 14:03 UTC≈8,330 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vps_xhq

中国IDC运营商面临在四月全面清理“翻墙”业务的重压 据知情人士提供的信息,中国大陆部分机房已收到指令严格清查“违规跨境访问”业务。4月1日开始的专项整治行动明确指出需整改的违规行为就是“翻墙”。不同于此前通知中使用的“流量转发”、“对等流量”、“网络安全隐患”等较为含糊的措辞。 最新的指令要求“坚决杜绝违规翻墙访问行为继续发生”。未能整改到位的机房将面临“永久关停”和“追偿”。这是今年以来对中国通信服务供应商不断升级的一项重大行动的最新举措。 境内机房中转是许多追求稳定性的“机场”所常用的方式,借助机房的优化线路IP连接国际网络,能够降低延迟减少IP被阻断的概率。受政策影响,许多“机场”已上调费用、关闭注册、开启直连。管控比以往任何时候都要严格,从业人士只得寄希望于政策在以后某个时刻回归宽松。 [消息等级 Level C2 · 简要]

9😍3

3 Jan 2026, 05:52 UTC≈13,100 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026

对了,忘记祝大家新年快乐了,希望现在还来得及🥰

46🫡7😈6👏4🎉2

3 Jan 2026, 05:52 UTC≈13,200 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

2026-01-02-「這裡什麼都沒有發生」:中國治理群體事件的手法近年發生了什麼變化? Origin | GoFiles | CatBoxMoe | CatBoxMoe | CatBoxMoe | CatBoxMoe

24 Dec 2025, 19:02 UTC≈14,500 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

38🎉10🍌3😈2

5 Nov 2025, 19:24 UTC≈20,900 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

要不要复活呢🤔

  1. 复活!堂堂归来!83%
  2. 还是就这样消散在历史的尘埃中吧17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤩64🍾20🤔6👍54👏1

17 Jun 2023, 23:57 UTC≈108,000 views1,919 reactionsread 12 August 2026

停运通知:出于种种原因与压力,频道管理员全员均不愿意继续运营和管理频道。在经过剩余的管理员内部的讨论投票之后,我们决定解除附属频道的联结,放弃对它的管理,并且停止树洞频道的运营。非常感谢大家一年间对频道的肯定与支持,来日方长,后会无期。

😱899😭467🍾210🫡112🙏74🤣44😢42🎉28

17 Jun 2023, 12:38 UTC≈94,800 views332 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😢171🍾57😭43🤣16💔1312👍10🤯4

16 Jun 2023, 13:36 UTC≈94,700 views661 reactionsread 12 August 2026

洞主已经十几天没上线了,让我们怀念他🙏🏻

🙏449🍾79😭54😱25🫡18🤣12👍7🤩5

11 Jun 2023, 13:23 UTC≈81,100 views87 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#洞友投稿 投稿内容为百度贴吧校园类分区学生信息滥用事件 图1为百度贴吧校园类分区华东地区官方群的一名志愿者被踢出后的自述, 图2、3为官方群管理员解释,该分区各吧主也开始核对各自学信网授权情况 图4为山东理工大学吧吧主反馈自己与吧务组的学信网信息均出现盗用情况 图5为华东地区官方群管理团队迫于群内压力开始排查相关情况 图6为6月9日该群群主发言记录,由记录可知学信网授权滥用情况重灾区为山东和安徽两地 截至发稿时,此事暂无最新消息

🤮41👍2015🌭8👏1🤔1🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @shudongcomin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2025, 19:24 UTCFinal Results849 voters

要不要复活呢🤔

  1. 复活!堂堂归来!83%
  2. 还是就这样消散在历史的尘埃中吧17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2023 to 9 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 810,737 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“树洞频道” (@shudongcomin), 8,484 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shudongcomin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.