Channel
@shpccj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
12,502subscribers
-246 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001366377494 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shpccj |
| Created | 18 January 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shpccj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 12,502 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 12,490 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 12,496 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 12,504 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 12,513 | -235 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 12,748 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 12,748 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 18 January 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (18 January 2021 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 142 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
95 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 65 | 68.4% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 15.8% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 5.26% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2021 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎰 #程程福利 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-程程 🎫 加入-上海出击大队 🎫 加入-上海出击大队公开榜 🎫 加入-上海修车报告 🎫 加入-上海出击大队广播台 🎁 奖品内容: 1p优惠券100 × 3 2p优惠券200 × 3 💡 活动说明: 中奖者机器人🤖会自动通知领取。 本福利领取后，出击老师请给出真实评价。 老师榜单：https://t.me/quanguo999/23865 中奖请联系老师: @myh2588 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月16日 10时19分19秒
🔍 超级搜索 TG必备搜索神器，帮你精准找到，想要的群组，频道，视频，音乐。 👇👇 点击下方按钮，进行搜索！
🔍 超级搜索 TG必备搜索神器，帮你精准找到，想要的群组，频道，视频，音乐。 👇👇 点击下方按钮，进行搜索！
https://t.me/shxczyq
⚡1
https://t.me/shxhjpzy
❤6
💯 上海出击大队，红人榜老师根据群友，测评，口碑，筛选，列入本榜，可放心出击，排名不分先后，持续更新中………… 红人榜第二页：👇👇👇 ⭐️宝洛精品御姐 1000p ⭐️甜甜后入极品 700p ⭐️大白兔高性价比 800p ⭐️小柒新人老师 800p ⭐️一琳特服老师 800p ⭐️娜娜大奶牛 1000p ⭐️青青轻熟老师 600p ⭐️语涵优质老师 1200p ⭐️语夕反差老师 800p ⭐️可心精品老师 1300p
❤11👍3
💯 上海出击大队，红人榜老师根据群友，测评，口碑，筛选，列入本榜，可放心出击，排名不分先后，持续更新中………… 红人榜第一页：👇👇👇 💥韦雪大奶妹 2000p 💥岚岚精品御姐 700p 💥如陌后入极品 700p 💥紫玉优质导师 1800p 💥杨玉环KB天花板 500/60分钟 💥kose青春亮妹 600p 💥Linda大奶老师 988p 💥浦东彤彤BBW 700p 💥奶昔大奶老师 600p 💥森林北大奶子 900p 💥媚娘抓龙筋 799p
❤19🔥4👏3👍2
第二页
❤11👍2👏2🔥1
下面列表老师都己认证👇👇👇
❤13👍5👏2🎉1
🔍上海出击大队导航 👉点击此处一键添加所有频道 └👉 上海出击大队 └👉 上海出击大队公开榜 └👉 上海出击大队认证榜 └👉 上海出击大队报告榜 └👉 上海出击大队广播台 └👉 大队管理员 └👉
❤5👍3⚡1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @shpccj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@shpccj edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 274,475 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海出击大队广播台” (@shpccj), 12,502 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shpccj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.