Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗽 𝗟𝗼𝗦𝘁 :

Channel

𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗽 𝗟𝗼𝗦𝘁 :

@shpLost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567088003
TypeChannel
Username@shpLost
Created3 January 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shpLost

Growth

213 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 2 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 08:00 — 2 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 23:3214 Aug 2026, 08:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:002no change
13 Aug 2026, 23:322first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 January 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

13 Jan 2022, 15:23 UTC111 viewsread 14 August 2026

ده تا اک خنثی میفروشم رنج قیمت 5/10/15 فقط و فقط شارژی خز . واتساپ هم ندارن . خار خنثی شده میخری بگو فقط واسطه غیر بلاک اسپم * آیدیم @IdFrFri

5 Jan 2022, 22:00 UTC141 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

5 شارژ همراه داد یه عک گرفت 👩🏻‍🦱🍓 راضی بود🧁🍻 نوش تبر نگایدم #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 توعم خواستی @HNYRBOT .

5 Jan 2022, 18:10 UTC108 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

5 شارژ همراه داد یه عک گرفت 🍧🌸 راضی بود🍃🌝 نوش تبر نگایدم #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 توعم خواستی @HNYRBOT .

5 Jan 2022, 17:52 UTC83 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

10 شارژ همراه داد 2 تا عک خز دادمش🤍🧼 راضی بود :' 🐬💗 نوش تبر نگایدم #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 توعم خواستی @HNYRBOT .

4 Jan 2022, 21:01 UTC72 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

200 کا نیت داد یه کوک خوشگل گرفت 🤍☃️ راضی بود💗🥤 نوش . تبر نگایدم ‌#LoSt توعم خواستی @HNYRBOT .

4 Jan 2022, 07:47 UTCviews —

𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗽 𝗟𝗼𝗦𝘁 : pinned «بسم الله 💗🧋 از حالا بعد هر معامله یا فروش داشتم برا اعتماد میریزم این چنل ♡︎ تبر نگایدم . شات رضایتا موجوده 💚📗 #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 '»

3 Jan 2022, 23:13 UTC64 viewsread 14 August 2026

واسطه میشم .💗🥤 اک و نیت و جت و میسپری دسم برات میفروشم . درصد میگیرم . عک خز ناب و تگ و .. اینا همه موجوده - میخری پی @iLoStMi . @HNYRBOT واسطه نمیام . اعتماد نداری شاتا و بچک بعد پی بده کصشرم بگ بلاکی .!

3 Jan 2022, 23:05 UTC60 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

15کا نیت داد 500 جت گرفت 🥥🤎 راضی بود 🫂💓 نوش ! تبر نگایدم ! #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 توعم خواستی @HNYRBOT .

3 Jan 2022, 22:59 UTC54 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

روش عک زنی صفر تا صد با متن خرید 🤍👻 پیشش بودم تا عک زد ! راضی بود 🍃💚 نوش .! تبر نگایدم #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 توعم خواستی @HNYRBOT .

3 Jan 2022, 22:55 UTC38 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

تو گپ فعالیتش بالا بود عک برد 💗🥊 راضی بود .🧸🦋 نوش ! تبر نگایدم #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 توعم خواستی @HNYRBoT

3 Jan 2022, 22:51 UTC33 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

108 کا نیت داد 8 تا عک خز خرید 😻🙌 راضی بود ! نوش 🐳💙 تبر نگایدم , #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 توعم خواستی @HNYRBOzt .

3 Jan 2022, 22:44 UTC26 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

17 کا نیت داد یه خز گرفت🍓💛 راضی بود 🍟 نوش تبر نگایدم . #𝖫𝗈𝖲𝗍 توعم خواستی @HNYRBOT .

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shpLost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,605,139 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗽 𝗟𝗼𝗦𝘁 :” (@shpLost), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shpLost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.