Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Show & Tell Academy

Channel

Show & Tell Academy

@showandtellastrology

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,348subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001257295312
TypeChannel
Username@showandtellastrology
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/showandtellastrology

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@showntelltang/174331 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC@showandtellastrology/5984 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@showntelltang/17453 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC@showandtellastrology/5989 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC1.00under a minute
@showntelltang/17464 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC@showandtellastrology/5992 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC1.002 minutes
@showandtellastrology/5999 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC@showntelltang/17486 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC1.002 minutes
@showandtellastrology/6002 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC@showntelltang/17497 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC1.004 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@showntelltang5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@showntelltang (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @showntelltang. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,3294,3484,338.57 August 2026 — 4,329 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,329 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,340 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,336 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,331 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,342 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,341 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,336 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,346 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,348 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 39 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,326–4,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 19:164,348+2
12 Sept 2026, 09:404,346+10
8 Sept 2026, 10:394,336-5
3 Sept 2026, 16:004,341-1
25 Aug 2026, 01:434,342+11
21 Aug 2026, 06:364,331-5
17 Aug 2026, 20:284,336-4
11 Aug 2026, 08:064,340+11
8 Aug 2026, 06:294,329no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:314,329first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 39s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⏳ Stop asking if today is lucky. Start asking... Lucky for what? That's the difference between following a calendar... and understanding Date Selection. ▶️ Watch the FULL video HERE Facebook: link Instagram: link Stay connected. Don't miss our next insight. ✨

7 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC318 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💰𝟏𝟔𝟖 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲… 𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐰𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠?💰 Many people believe that 168 automatically represents wealth, success and prosperity. But does a number become powerful simply because it sounds lucky? A number that looks fortunate on the surface may not necessarily produce the result you expect. Join our 🆓 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐖𝐄𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐑 “𝐈𝐬 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐁𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐀 𝐁𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞?” 🔍 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐚 𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮’𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫:…

❤3

7 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC290 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨ Maybe you're not doing the wrong thing. Maybe you're just doing the right thing... at the wrong time. The same action can create completely different results when the timing changes. Sometimes, success isn't about trying harder. It's about knowing when to take action. ▶️ Watch the FULL video HERE Facebook: link Instagram: link Stay connected. Don't miss our next insight. ✨

6 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC404 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✨ 𝐂𝐨𝐜𝐨 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟓 𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐮𝐜𝐤. But in Numerology, even a lucky number can create challenges when its energy becomes unbalanced. Your birth number may reveal your natural strengths, hidden weaknesses and repeated life patterns. So, is your birth number a blessing—or a curse? Join our 🆓 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐖𝐄𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐑 “𝐈𝐬 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐁𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐀 𝐁𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞?” 🔍 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐚 𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮’𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫: 🔢 Ar…

❤2

6 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC382 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😂 "2 days with no sleep doesn't affect me." Famous last words. 😅 Sometimes, what we think is "normal" isn't always what's best for us. Hi, we're Show & Tell Academy! 👋 We believe learning Chinese Astrology doesn't have to be complicated. We create simple, practical, and entertaining content to help you explore Destiny Reading, Date Selection, Feng Shui, Numerology, and Qi Men Dun Jia. 🌟 Follow us and discover ho…

5 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC498 viewsread 8 August 2026

👟 𝐓𝐰𝐨 𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬. 𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐦. 𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲. The founders of Adidas and Puma started together… But ended as lifelong enemies. Could their birth dates explain why? Join our 🆓 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐖𝐄𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐑 “𝐈𝐬 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐁𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐀 𝐁𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞?” 🔍 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐚 𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮’𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫: 🔢 Are Your Numbers Helping You or Destroying You? 🚘 What Is Your Vehicle Number Telling You? 💰 Is 168 a Good Num…

5 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC497 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👟 𝐃𝐢𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐏𝐮𝐦𝐚 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬? They built a company together. Then became rivals for life. What caused one of the biggest family feuds in business history? What if their birth dates reveal the answer? Join our 🆓 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐖𝐄𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐑 “𝐈𝐬 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐁𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐀 𝐁𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞?” 🔍 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐚 𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮’𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫: 🔢 Are Your Numbers Helping You or Destroying You? 🚘 What…

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @showandtellastrology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Piranha Profits™ Online Trading School
@piranhaprofits · 22,868
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Malaysiakini EN (Official)
@malaysiakini · 29,167
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Show & Tell Academy” (@showandtellastrology), 4,348 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/showandtellastrology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.