Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net -143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,673–6,326 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 03:39
5,748
-45
5 Nov 2026, 09:51
5,793
-30
1 Nov 2026, 23:17
5,823
-13
29 Oct 2026, 21:58
5,836
-21
27 Oct 2026, 05:29
5,857
-31
24 Oct 2026, 06:36
5,888
-30
21 Oct 2026, 15:19
5,918
-23
18 Oct 2026, 11:06
5,941
-17
15 Oct 2026, 11:21
5,958
-32
12 Oct 2026, 02:00
5,990
-26
5 Oct 2026, 15:01
6,016
-38
27 Sept 2026, 18:58
6,054
-109
18 Sept 2026, 09:39
6,163
-34
14 Sept 2026, 09:00
6,197
-16
10 Sept 2026, 16:00
6,213
-9
5 Sept 2026, 15:21
6,222
-12
1 Sept 2026, 22:55
6,234
-15
27 Aug 2026, 12:34
6,249
+7
24 Aug 2026, 14:13
6,242
-9
21 Aug 2026, 05:48
6,251
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.2%
avg views ÷ 5,748 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,850
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
42 (30 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
16,666
Reactions total
508
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,067 reactions across 42 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
602
29.1%
👍
353
17.1%
😁
265
12.8%
❤
254
12.3%
custom 4906700170869080632
121
5.85%
💯
99
4.79%
🍓
96
4.64%
❤🔥
79
3.82%
🤝
65
3.14%
⚡
34
1.64%
🌚
23
1.11%
👏
17
0.822%
💔
16
0.774%
✍
11
0.532%
🕊
9
0.435%
🤓
7
0.339%
😢
5
0.242%
🤨
5
0.242%
🏆
3
0.145%
🤩
2
0.097%
1 further kind
1
0.048%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 42 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shodmonbek_rasulov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (44.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#어휘
💪 “화이팅” aslida inglizcha so’z, lekin inglizlar uni bunday ma’noda ishlatishmaydi!
Ko’pchilik 화이팅ni koreyscha “omad, bo’sh kelma” degan so’z deb o’ylaydi.
Aslida u inglizcha fighting - “jang, urushish” so’zidan kelib chiqqan. Koreyslar uni “olg’a, sen uddalaysan!” ma’nosida imtihon, ish suhbati yoki o’yin oldidan aytishadi. Ingliz tilida esa fighting faqat janjal yoki jang degan ma'noni anglatadi😅
Qizig’i: lu…
#qiziq #읽기
🧅 Nega piyoz to’g’raganda yig’laymiz?
Osh qilyapsiz: 부엌da turib, 칼ni olasiz va 양파ni to’g’ray boshlaysiz. Bir daqiqa o’tmay 눈ingizdan yosh oqa boshlaydi. Tanishmi? 😅
🔪 Hammasi kesishdan boshlanadi. 양파 juda mayda 세포lardan iborat, 칼 ularni yorganda ichidagi moddalar bir-biriga aralashib ketadi.
💨 Shu moddalardan maxsus gaz paydo bo’ladi. U 공기ga ko’tarilib, to’g’ri 눈ingizga boradi.
💧 눈 bu gazni yoqtirmayd…
Va’da qilingan Coffee shop PDF fayli! ☕️
Ichida:
• Kafeda kerak bo’ladigan 40 ta so’z va ularning o’zbekcha tarjimasi
• Videodagi dialog va uning tarjimasi
Saqlab, o’rganib qo’ying, Koreyada kafega borganingizda albatta asqotadi 😉
@shodmonbek_rasulov
#어휘
💼 “아르바이트” aslida koreyscha emas, nemischa so’z!
🤔 Ko’pchilik 아르바이트ni koreyscha so’z deb o’ylaydi. Koreyada o’qiyotgan talabalarning barchasi bu so’z bilan tanish.
🎯 Aslida u nemischa Arbeit — “ish, mehnat” so’zidan kelgan. Avval Yaponiyada talabalar o’qishdan bo’sh vaqtda qiladigan ishlarini shunday atashgan, keyinchalik bu so’z Koreyaga ham o’tgan. Nemischada Arbeit har qanday ish, koreyschada esa faqat qo’sh…
Ovqat = “Karis tili” O’qituvchisi
Tasavvur qilamiz qorningiz ochdi. Sizda qorinni to’yg’azish uchun ikki yo’l bor:
1) Bozordan masalliqni olib kelib o’zingiz tayyorlash;
2) Oshxonadan tayyor ovqatni sotib olish.
O'ziga yarasha plus va minus tomonlari bor.
O'zingiz masalliq olib kelib ovqat qilsangiz ancha arzon bo'ladi. Lekin borib-kelish, pishir-kuydir uchun vaqt yo'qotasiz.
Bonusiga tajribangiz bo'lmasa ovqats…
Coffee shopda tanishingiz ishlab qolsa…
Videodagi ishlatilgan iboralar:
🔘 여기서 일해요? — Shu yerda ishlaysizmi?
🔘어떤 커피가 맛있어요? — Qaysi kofe mazali?
🔘오늘은 제가 살게요. — Bugun men mehmon qilaman.
사다 — sotib olmoq, lekin 제가 살게요 — “men to’layman” degani.
Coffee shop mavzusidagi so’zlar to’liq PDF qiziqmi?
🔥 — qoldiring!
@shodmonbek_rasulov
Jumong bilan mendagi “TOP 5” farq
Men Toshkentlikman, Jumong toza “Karis”)
Menda TOPIK 6 bor, Jumongda esa yo’q:)
Men Jeonbuk Milliy Universitetini bitirganman. Jumongni saroyda qillichbozlik kurslarida o’qigan deb eshitgandim.
Men o‘quvchilarimga motivatsiya beraman, Jumong esa qo‘shinlariga.
Jumong Xan sulolasi(Hozirgi Xitoy) zulmidan o’z xalqini qutqarishga yordam bergan. Men esa Koreys tili o’rganuvchilariga…
Ustozlar yordamingiz kerak!
Oramizda Koreys tilini o’qitishda kamida 1 yil tajribasi bor, TOPIK 4/5급 sertifikatiga ega “yordamim tegsa hursand bo’laman” degan ustozlarimiz bormi?)
Koreys tili o’rganuvchilarning asosiy muammolarini yechish uchun kattaroq g’oya ustida ishlayapmiz.
15-20 daqiqa fikr almashamiz. Aloqaga chiqsangiz hursand bo’lamiz.
Hammaga rahmat, yetarlicha ustozlar labbay deb yordam berishga tayyor…
#tabassum
왕초보 - yangi boshlovchi
저는… Men…
운전하는 감자입니다… Mashina haydaydigan kartoshkaman… 🥔
Umumiy tarjimasi: “Men — mashina haydaydigan kartoshkaman, ya’ni ruldagi juda tajribasiz haydovchiman.”
🔹왕초보 — biror ishda juda tajribasiz, endigina boshlagan odamga ishlatiladi.
🔹감자 (kartoshka) bu yerda hazil tariqasida ishlatilgan. Ya’ni haydovchi o‘zini kartoshkaga o‘xshatib, “Men hali juda no‘noq haydovchiman, ehtiyot …
Ba’zi o’quvchilarga motivatsiya berish kerak emas, aksincha o’zlari ustozga o’rgatish uchun Motivatsiya berishadi.
Amallar niyatlarga bog’liq.
Allohni roziligini istab qilingan har bir ish uchun ajr bor.
O’sha gap: Mayda narsalarga rozi bo’lib ketavermaylik. Himmatni balandroq qilaylik.
Alloh hammamizni omadimizni bersin.
@shodmonbek_rasulov
Koreyslar nima deydi?
Xitoy brendi bo’lgan BYD mashinalari O’zbekistonda anchagina mashxur. Yaqinda Koreyaga ham rasmiy tarzda kirib kelgan edi. (2025.01.16)
Kecha Koreya yangiliklarini ko’rish jarayonida bir videoga ko’zim tushdi.
Qiziq jihati bu mashinalarni sotib olayotgan koreyslarning har 10 kishidan 8 tasi BYD mashinalarini logosi, modeli, yozuvlarini olib tashlashyotgan yoki ko’rinmaydigan qilib ustidan bos…
Sening Koreyaga kelgandan keyin koreys tilini o’rganmoqchi bo’lgan dusting:
Qishda: Ish yo’q, kursga to’lashga pul yo’q. Yozda hotirjam o’rganaman.
Yozda: Ish ko’payib ketdi charchab qolyapman, dars qilishga vaqt bo’lmayapti. Qishda hotirjam o’rganaman.
Oylar, yillar shu zaylda o’tarmish. Lekin Koreys tilini o’rganishdan darak yo’q…
Tanish holatmi? 🤔
@shodmobek_rasulov
😁35💔7💯7❤6👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @shodmonbek_rasulov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Yo’q, nima deb mahmadanali qildiz? Tarjima qibering48%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TOPIK 6 | Shodmonbek Rasulov” (@shodmonbek_rasulov), 5,748 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shodmonbek_rasulov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.