Кто сейчас активно вяжет? Делитесь, что на крючке👇
❤28
Signed Катя

Channel
@shoddicrochet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,379subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001602867073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shoddicrochet |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shoddicrochet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 2,379 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 2,381 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 2,382 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 2,382 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 16 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
511 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 346 | 67.7% | |
| 🔥 | 133 | 26.0% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 6.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2024 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кто сейчас активно вяжет? Делитесь, что на крючке👇
❤28
Signed Катя
Видео базового цветка тут https://youtube.com/watch?v=llIQw3PLmEY&si=fAvePRo0kVBWKCAS
❤30👍1
Signed Катя
Всем привет! Как же я соскучилась по вязанию и по всем вам🥺😘 На днях связала брелок-цветок. Сделала 5 лепестков и добавила карабин и шармы из детского набора для украшений. Карабин, конечно, большой, это все что было дома)
❤58
Signed Катя
Photo, posted without a caption
❤35🔥1
Signed Катя
Всем привет) может кто-то сможет подсказать🤍
❤8
Signed Катя
Катюша , мне послали Вас ВСилы , был запрос найти схему вязания скатерти , перерыла все возможные площадки , пошла на ютуб, а там ваше видео и в комментариях ссылка сюда и вопросы по схемам 😍😍😍😍, может Вы мне и поможете или девочки . Скатерть с листьями , очень меня зацепила , а схему не найду
❤11🔥1
Signed Катя
Привет, девчули😘 Для тех, у кого проблемы с YouTube, какая-та часть видео есть на Rutube. Смотрите😘
❤82🔥17👍16
Signed Катя
Что вы сейчас вяжете? Кидайте фото, делитесь ссылками на МК👇
❤18
Signed Катя
Привет, девочки) целую осень с вами не виделись. Я наконец-то начала работать над мк по жилету. Надеюсь очень скоро соберемся на совместное вязание🫶
🔥59❤30👍4
Signed Катя
С 16 по 18 августа распродажа мастер-классов. Любой МК за 450₽/15 byn Все МК в формате видео+инструкция. Видео все размещены на YouTube! Присылай фото понравившихся изделий @shoddiknit и я отправлю реквизиты.
🔥47❤9👍5
Signed Катя
Кто еще не вязал со мной джутовые салфетки, пора исправлять🖤 Такие они уютные. •Джутовый шпагат 3-хниточный (1600 текс) 100 метров; •Крючок 4 Видео тут
❤37🔥8👍6
Signed Катя
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @shoddicrochet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shoddi” (@shoddicrochet), 2,379 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shoddicrochet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.