Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шмот-просвет

Channel

Шмот-просвет

@shmotprosvet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

18,853subscribers

-81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001833075063
TypeChannel
Username@shmotprosvet
DescriptionПрививаю чувство вкуса не любишь ходить по магазинам? Я сходила вместо тебя Связь: @PR_shmotprosvet А+ Включена РКН в перечень персональных страниц: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67359d458d852d32336dd4ca&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created20 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shmotprosvet

Growth

18,84318,93418,888.57 August 2026 — 18,934 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,934 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,924 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,915 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,913 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,901 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,897 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,893 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,868 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,857 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,843 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,853 subscribers18,8537 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net -81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,829–18,948 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:0618,853+10
16 Aug 2026, 21:3518,843-14
15 Aug 2026, 13:0418,857-11
14 Aug 2026, 00:3818,868-25
12 Aug 2026, 17:2818,893-4
11 Aug 2026, 20:1218,897-4
10 Aug 2026, 23:0118,901-12
9 Aug 2026, 23:3518,913-2
9 Aug 2026, 00:5418,915-9
7 Aug 2026, 21:4118,924-10
7 Aug 2026, 12:0018,934no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:4918,934first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.50%
avg views ÷ 18,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held24 (4 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total38,440
Reactions total907
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,800
Videos
427
Links
1,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
52s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

907 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48953.9%
🔥21423.6%
👍869.48%
😁333.64%
🥰323.53%
👏252.76%
💯242.65%
😢40.441%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 907reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC≈1,220 views32 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Немного Шанель отгрузили в Love republic. Пошла примерять абсолютно потрясающий жакет с воротником-стойкой. В комплекте с такими же брюками брать не советую - скучно. А красные кожаные брюки — то, что нужно. Очень хороши! Лучше сядут на более ровную фигуру. И рубашки с высоким воротом понравились, есть в 4 оттенках. Вообще давно не заходила в LR, захотелось перемерить полмагазина.

24👍5🥰3

16 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,320 views33 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Жду, когда дизайнеры придумают что-нибудь такое же удобное и универсальное, как серые треники. Чесслово, надоели они уже в образах, но с ребенком это реально самая удобная одежда, которая сочетается со всем моим гардеробом. Покопались в песочнице и пошли по магазинам

23🔥6👍4

16 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,460 views75 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Для мам. Сын впервые за 1,5 года словил орви. Неделю сидели на больничном. Температура 39, насморк, кашель. Короче, все сразу. Думала, сойду с ума от постоянного мониторинга его состояния и переживаний. Температура начала падать, но через пару дней вернулась. И снова 39. Педиатр по описанию всех событий дала рецепт на антибиотик со словами «уже надо подключать, кажется». Я к антибиотикам без подтвержденной бактериа

46👍15👏12🥰2

14 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,540 views35 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Словила сегодня ностальгическую ноту по детству в деревне, увидев коллекцию от Антихрупкость. Кажется, сегодня на десерт будет самое ностальгическое пирожное — печенька с маслом и вареньем. Интересно, какая еда ассоциируется у вас с детством? А то мне подруга рассказала, что им в детском саду давали макароны с сахаром. Макароны. С сахаром. И все их любили.

24😁7👍4

13 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈3,640 views37 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Безоговорочно влюблена в образы от стилиста Ксении Одинцовой 💔

🔥2014👍3

13 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,700 views25 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Новый дроп cherryboom выглядит как сны при температуре 40. Занимательно, что продают по предзаказу. Не понимаю, у нас так много любителей экстремальной обуви или боятся привезти и не продать? Кажется, коллекцию скупят креаторы для ярких фото)

13😁9👍2🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,270 views22 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Шнуровка на одежде не дает мне покоя. Заказала сапоги и юбку, пока искала собралась целая подборка, поэтому показываю: Сапоги Roksi Юбка и корсаж Chuba Юбка The lemm Балетки Tendance Джинсовка Lime Кеды Befree Юбка Lime

13👍4🔥4😁1

12 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,020 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Влюбилась в мыс и фактуру обуви из новой коллекции Askent. Хочется теперь каракулевые лоферы

9🔥5👍3😢1

12 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC≈1,290 views44 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ситуация критическая: до конца лета 2 недели. А я так и не посидела ни на одной террасе в тишине и одиночестве. Жаль, рядом с домом нет достойных ресторанов. Потому что ну очень хочется выйти на завтрак в таком пижамном комплекте от Crate.

💯21🔥10😁10😢3

11 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,380 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Хотелки вторника таковы и никаковы больше: сапоги на шнуровке и длиннющая сумка. Все fanci club.

11👍4🥰3

10 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,520 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Если каждый август у вас в холодильнике появляются кабачки, вы точно не одиноки. В запретграмме рекомендации настроились на урожайные вайбы. Поэтому делюсь рецептами, которые сохранила для себя. В комментариях будут подробности и ники блогов с рецептами.

22🔥10😁3

10 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,380 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На этом канале мы любим и поддерживаем российские бренды. Сегодня о сложных временах рассказала создательница ANNUKO Анна Онохина. Бренд дает скидку 25% на все. А я покажу мой любимый мятый сет из летней коллекции в трендовом оттенке морской волны. На загорелой коже на отдыхе будет просто великолепно!

16👏5🥰4

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @shmotprosvet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@shmotprosvet edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 31,524 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шмот-просвет” (@shmotprosvet), 18,853 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shmotprosvet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.