Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔞 ЯРД | Шляхов про инфоБИЗНЕС

Channel

🔞 ЯРД | Шляхов про инфоБИЗНЕС

@shlyakhov_roman

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,030subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424553774
TypeChannel
Username@shlyakhov_roman
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shlyakhov_roman

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0301,0401,0357 August 2026 — 1,040 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,040 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,039 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,038 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,036 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,037 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,035 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,033 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,034 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,033 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,032 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,030 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,029–1,042 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:591,030-2
15 Sept 2026, 05:571,032-1
11 Sept 2026, 08:361,033-1
6 Sept 2026, 19:391,034+1
30 Aug 2026, 17:271,033-2
24 Aug 2026, 21:091,035-2
18 Aug 2026, 08:121,037+1
15 Aug 2026, 01:271,036-2
11 Aug 2026, 15:051,038-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:321,039-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:001,040no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:551,040first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4646.0%
🔥2424.0%
💯99.00%
😁88.00%
👏66.00%
👎33.00%
🕊22.00%
🏆11.00%
😍11.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Telegram пропал из App Store Мессенджер больше недоступен для скачивания в App Store в российском и американском регионах. Из магазина приложений Apple он попросту исчез. Наивный чукотский парень Пашка… мечтал создать «свободный» интернет без контроля. Но не знал, что в этом мире на земле, ВСЕ контролируется. И если ты, нарушаешь правила игры, тебя просто удаляют с поля. Как во всех играх. Изучайте правила, а не

👎2

3 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC93 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а это его конверсии автоматизации

3 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC89 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А это статистика лидера "КС 78" который в Апреле 2026 сделал 24 164 кодовых слова

3 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC95 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Знаю, вы очень любите цифры в деталях) Как вам тогда такие цыфры по трафику с трёх reels?) Особенно с кодовым словом 78 (КС 78). На каждое КС один одинаковый рилс. По времени сколько они крутились кс77 - с 31 октября 2024 по август 2025 кс55 - с 24 июня 2024 по июль 2025 а лидер крутится до сих пор: кс78 - с 26 декабря 2024 по 3 августа 2026

1 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC135 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот я тупица бл@ть... GPT выпустило обновление, я обновился и ничего не менял. И начал замечать, что агенты начали тупить... думаю, ну раньше же они круто держали контекст, что случилось... ну наверное уже очень много информации и они перегружены. Потом смотрю видео по Codex и там говорят, что теперь приложении нужно переключаться с GPT на Codex) И оказывается я всё это время работал просто в GPT обычном 😅 ппц...

😁72

1 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC139 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нормуль залетел пост, для разминки подойдет.

6

31 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC160 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что за красота 😍🤤 Сегодня ДР у лучшего друга супруги 🎂

5🔥4🕊2

31 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC150 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

И сразу уже начинает думать в правильном направлении. Совсем другое дело. Самая большая проблема в ИИ - это он ПОСТОЯННО теряет контекст и ЦЕЛЬ, Фокус, Ядро проекта которое мы утвердили. И его нужно каждый раз в это сознательно возвращать, чтобы он прочитывал эти документы (они у него есть) и только после этого выдавал ответ.

5

31 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC140 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наглядный пример, что значит быть НАД ИИ. Ты можешь определить, что он несет чушь и скорректировать его в правильном направлении. Предложил ему накидать мне идеи матрицы продуктов для моего нового проекта. Очень красиво звучит, но ничего не понятно… Видите эту разницу? И какие я ему вопросы задаю?

1

31 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC134 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня наконец сформулировал и утвердил свое новое позиционирование: - Большую идею проекта - Уникальный механизм - Ключевую проблему - 3 аватара - парадокс - что клиент покупает у меня Это дает проекту ФОКУС не отклоняться от ЯДРА проекта и понимание «Куда я веду людей». Это убирает раздрайв и мысли «а о чем мне писать?» «про что Я?» «чем Я отличаюсь от других?», спокойно выстраивать контент маркетинг создавая со

5🔥4👏2😍1

31 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC143 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера по активничал в тредс и сразу охвата за сутки выросли в 2 раза. Интересный формат, буду дальше нащупывать свой формат разгона аккаунта и набора подписчиков и потом перелив в ТГ .

4🔥4👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shlyakhov_roman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Татьяна Чупрова | Психолог
@tanatanyshachup · 51,568
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Друзья Дональда
@steven_bb · 702,168
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔞 ЯРД | Шляхов про инфоБИЗНЕС” (@shlyakhov_roman), 1,030 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shlyakhov_roman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.