Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net +1,754. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,558–14,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 23:58
14,708
+1,163
19 Sept 2026, 06:02
13,545
+119
16 Sept 2026, 23:39
13,426
+91
15 Sept 2026, 02:18
13,335
+28
13 Sept 2026, 12:39
13,307
+211
11 Sept 2026, 19:21
13,096
+85
9 Sept 2026, 08:40
13,011
-48
5 Sept 2026, 21:57
13,059
+70
3 Sept 2026, 18:00
12,989
+40
2 Sept 2026, 10:42
12,949
+49
1 Sept 2026, 12:24
12,900
-29
31 Aug 2026, 14:36
12,929
+33
30 Aug 2026, 16:53
12,896
+18
29 Aug 2026, 15:29
12,878
+8
28 Aug 2026, 16:03
12,870
-3
27 Aug 2026, 16:34
12,873
+5
26 Aug 2026, 17:12
12,868
+30
25 Aug 2026, 20:26
12,838
-29
24 Aug 2026, 18:07
12,867
-29
23 Aug 2026, 02:05
12,896
first reading
Engagement
99 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.74%
avg views ÷ 14,708 subscribers
Avg views / post
844
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 99 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
99 (30 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
15,189
Reactions total
300
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 48s
Average length
1m 24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,809 reactions across 97 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,119
61.9%
❤🔥
219
12.1%
💘
165
9.12%
🔥
136
7.52%
💯
59
3.26%
😱
19
1.05%
🍓
16
0.884%
💋
11
0.608%
🤷
9
0.498%
🙏
8
0.442%
👍
5
0.276%
🤝
5
0.276%
🍾
4
0.221%
🎉
4
0.221%
🙊
4
0.221%
🤡
4
0.221%
⚡
3
0.166%
✍
3
0.166%
🎅
3
0.166%
😘
3
0.166%
5 further kinds
10
0.553%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,809 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кто хочет знать всю необходимую теорию для экзамена и уверенно решать каждый номер - это к нам
- 2 ролика с теорий каждую неделю
- 2 веба с практикой
- дз к каждому уроку
- новый пробный вариант
До экзамена мы не просто изучим теорию, но и повторим ее несколько раз
Пробников у вас будет больше 30 в доступе, решай - не хочу
Кураторы ответят на любой вопрос в любое время суток
Без лишних слов - приглашаю на годово…
Разбор номера 20 - нового задания по терминам
Вспомните смысл понятия «бортничество» и ответьте на вопросы. Как бортничество связано с международной торговлей Руси? Представители каких слоев древнерусского общества были задействованы в международной торговле?
1) товары бортничества - мед и воск, экспортировались из Древней Руси, в первую очередь, в христианские страны.
2) в международной торговле участвовали купц…
Уже через 1 час выйдет первый ролик годового курса!
В нем вы узнаете:
💬 Как работать на курсе в первые недели его старта. С чего начать.
💬 Какие инструменты есть на курсе для подготовки на Топ баллы
💬 Познакомитесь с преподавателями и зарядитесь на весь учебный год правильным настроение
Этот ролик обязателен к просмотру, он обеспечит продуктивную работу в течении всего года ❤️
Ваша то, старалась, придумывала
Все для чего?
Для того чтобы уже сегодня вы были спокойны и понимали, что на экзамене условие нового номера не станет для вас сюрпризом
На курсе с первого практического веба и первого дз мы будем подключать новые прототипы, собирая ваша личную базу
Большой сборник прототипов нового задания 22 ЕГЭ по истории 2027 с идеальными ключами
Мы прописали условия и ответы по всем периодам, чтобы твоя подготовка была максимально эффективной
Сохраняй и решай ❤️
Кто еще не успел посмотреть разбор ДЕМО 2027 - переходим по ССЫЛКЕ
Решение каждого задания, разбалловка, что нужно делать, чтобы набрать максимум баллов - всё это ждет вас в ролике
ЗАПИСЫВАЕМСЯ НА ГОДОВОЙ
У нас ⤵️
- 2-3 ролика с теорией каждую неделю
- 2 веба с практикой каждую неделю
- 4-5 домашних работ каждую неделю
- новый пробный вариант - каждую неделю
Все это по безумно выгодной цене
❤3🔥3🍓2❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @shkolkovo_history. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@shkolkovo_history edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПРО100 ЕГЭ История @history_ege · 29,051 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Егор Кант ЕГЭ обществознание @histkant · 43,601 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
Никита Равич | История ЕГЭ 2028 Умскул | Следствие вели историки @ravichhist · 22,706 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
Топ-репетитор | ЕГЭ история | 100балльный репетитор🇷🇺 @topkirill · 40,081 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
История вокруг нас | Эля Смит | История ЕГЭ СМИТАП @elya_smith · 28,140 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
Даша Львова | История ОГЭ 2027 | Львиные истории | Умскул @lion_history · 49,640 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Ксюша Сумина | ОГЭ Русский язык | Школково @oge_s_ksushey · 28,960 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
Аля Виноградова | История ЕГЭ 2027 | Такая вот история | Умскул @alyahist · 51,219 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
очки эксперта | егэ налегке обществознание 2027 @egenalegke · 26,449 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
история и котики / ЕГЭ ОГЭ 2027 стадикэтс иик @historyandcats · 36,593 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
Валентиныч | Обществознание ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @valentinitch · 65,146 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
обществознание и котики / ЕГЭ ОГЭ 2027 стадикэтс @socialandcatss · 20,515 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Таня Коваль. ЕГЭ по русскому языку @TatiashkaEGE · 52,966 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Егор Кант ОГЭ Обществознание 2027 Школково @kant_soc · 53,933 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
ОГЭ по математике с Настей @nagibatorOGE · 30,789 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алёнины истории. ЕГЭ история Школково” (@shkolkovo_history), 14,708 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shkolkovo_history.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.