Channel
@shkatulkatwx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004447483660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shkatulkatwx |
| Created | 9 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shkatulkatwx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 144 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 139 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 139 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (9 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,218 |
| Reactions total | 296 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
462 reactions across 12 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5395557690711744255 | 48 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5325884009681547767 | 47 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5424939411659826267 | 37 | 8.01% | |
| custom 5377531773099995218 | 34 | 7.36% | |
| custom 6138475166201551066 | 28 | 6.06% | |
| custom 5465584001441866545 | 25 | 5.41% | |
| custom 6138422157715183748 | 24 | 5.19% | |
| custom 6138810736291354412 | 21 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5395546717070302262 | 20 | 4.33% | |
| custom 5325814212168019691 | 17 | 3.68% | |
| custom 5337239301916739405 | 17 | 3.68% | |
| custom 5424982996987946325 | 17 | 3.68% | |
| custom 6138960707959398009 | 16 | 3.46% | |
| custom 5278310636923689672 | 14 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5422573520334891314 | 13 | 2.81% | |
| custom 5393163766135269023 | 10 | 2.16% | |
| custom 5393190635450690223 | 9 | 1.95% | |
| custom 5276424270107415482 | 8 | 1.73% | |
| custom 5237791842438769192 | 6 | 1.30% | |
| custom 5282802249297332222 | 6 | 1.30% | |
| 16 further kinds | 45 | 9.74% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 462reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shkatulkatwx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
хехе, это шо, парная ава с данте??
custom 527831063692368967214custom 52784417751601411525custom 52377155938843615094custom 52377918424387691923custom 52379521735679269713custom 53955576907117442552custom 61384751662015510662custom 52784997872834066941
данте я тебя обожаю, клянусь
custom 542493941165982626731custom 53955467170703022629custom 54225735203348913149custom 52377918424387691923custom 54249829969879463253custom 52381309301067882832custom 52784997872834066941custom 53931637661352690231
тоже решила заполнить😊
custom 539555769071174425528custom 53931637661352690237custom 54249829969879463257custom 54249394116598262674custom 53143700957141777923custom 61384751662015510663custom 53955467170703022622custom 53956794788043896022
࿙𝐏𝐈𝐂𝐂𝐇𝐀 ࣪ ִֶָ𐔌՞. .՞𐦯 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𐙚𓌔ׅ𓌔ׄ𓌔ׅ𓌔 ♡゙ 𓌔ׅ𓌔ׄ𓌔ׅ𓌔𐙚 коллаб с зишшей 🤍 мне вроде нравится, давно хотела ей коллаб предложить, у нее ос очень красивая ㅤ𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐬 · #пикча ࣪ ִֶ ☕️
custom 546558400144186654521custom 53955467170703022629custom 53955576907117442558custom 53258840096815477672custom 54249394116598262672custom 54249829969879463252custom 53931637661352690231custom 53956794788043896021
спойлер хее, делаю свою часть для коллаба
custom 532588400968154776719custom 53931906354506902237custom 53955576907117442556custom 54225735203348913143custom 53931637661352690231custom 53956794788043896021custom 54202791187406274001custom 54223725845849160391
• выложу ка я вам сюда свой анон t.me/anonaskbot?start=y6fqzymz567vtne 🤩ㅤ𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐬 · #аноним ࣪ ִֶ 🪽
custom 61384751662015510668custom 52828022492973322223custom 53775317730999952183custom 52828214349162462701custom 53258840096815477671custom 53931906354506902231custom 53955576907117442551custom 54249829969879463251
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️ обо ⚫️⚫️⚫️🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ０１. я очень эмоциональный человек🤩 ０２. я в целом общительный человек, иногда общение с новыми людьми дается сложновато ０３. у меня тревожный тип привязанности🤩 ０４. сейчас мне 18 || др 12 июня🤩 ０５. я не люблю слушать гл сообщения, и сама их не записываю т.к мне проще написать чем перезаписывать гл по нескольку раз🤩🤩 ０６. люблю дарить подарки больше чем получать🤩🤩 ㅤ𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐬 · #фактыобомне
custom 613881073629135441215custom 53775317730999952184custom 61389607079593980094custom 52828022492973322223custom 53665027008107876761custom 53955576907117442551custom 54249829969879463251custom 54655840014418665451
Posted without readable text
࿙𝐏𝐈𝐂𝐂𝐇𝐀 ࣪ ִֶָ𐔌՞. .՞𐦯 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𐙚𓌔ׅ𓌔ׄ𓌔ׅ𓌔 ♡゙ 𓌔ׅ𓌔ׄ𓌔ׅ𓌔𐙚 обещанная пикча год назад ежику.. :: как я давно пикчи не делала, капец, наверное где то 5 месяцев точно, мне врод нравится, а вроде нет ㅤ𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐬 · #пикча ࣪ ִֶ 🪽
custom 537753177309999521825custom 53258840096815477678custom 61388107362913544124custom 61384221577151837483custom 61384751662015510662custom 54249829969879463251custom 54655840014418665451custom 61387594758566781991
🌟🌟🌟 🗝 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩 лисята, помоги выбрать одежду для твиксюши..я хочу заказать полностью отрисованную модель(или как там таких называют) не молчите только пж⭐
custom 613842215771518374817custom 61389607079593980095custom 61384751662015510664custom 53258840096815477671custom 53775317730999952181custom 53931906354506902231custom 53955576907117442551custom 54655840014418665451
ээх, осталось лицо и волосы, может щас хвостик ей нарисую вместо распущенных делаю свою часть к коллабу
custom 532581421216801969115custom 52764242701074154824custom 61388170670731494553custom 53258840096815477671custom 53775317730999952181custom 61384221577151837481custom 61384751662015510661custom 61387594758566781991
🌟🌟🌟🌟—🌟🌟🌟🌟✨ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𐙚𓌔ׅ𓌔ׄ𓌔ׅ𓌔 ♡゙ 𓌔ׅ𓌔ׄ𓌔ׅ𓌔𐙚 привет лисенок!! • Если ты любишь атмосферные пикчи, посты, то буду рада видеть тебя на своего канале!!💘 https://t.me/shkatulkatwx
custom 532588400968154776712custom 61384751662015510664custom 53235259738517926062custom 53258142121680196912custom 61384221577151837482custom 61388107362913544122custom 53257436888050190251custom 61389607079593980091
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @shkatulkatwx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 261,426 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“шкатулка твиксюши” (@shkatulkatwx), 144 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shkatulkatwx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.