когда он умирает и умоляет о помощи, но пусть ему лучше помогает художница, чей арт он лайкнул в 2020 году
❤4🤯1
Signed лиза 👽

Channel
@shizoliza111
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003551307599 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shizoliza111 |
| Description | 🍺🦭? |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shizoliza111 |
@shizoliza111 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 162 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 162 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
543 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 226 | 41.6% | |
| 🔥 | 99 | 18.2% | |
| 💋 | 61 | 11.2% | |
| 🤯 | 42 | 7.73% | |
| 💔 | 36 | 6.63% | |
| 😍 | 26 | 4.79% | |
| 🍓 | 21 | 3.87% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 2.76% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.10% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 0.921% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 0.921% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.184% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 543 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shizoliza111. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
когда он умирает и умоляет о помощи, но пусть ему лучше помогает художница, чей арт он лайкнул в 2020 году
❤4🤯1
Signed лиза 👽
теперь и сюда залить можно ето последняя штука на аф
🤯7👀1🔥1
Signed лиза 👽
подружка мая палина
❤17🔥4🤯1
Signed лиза 👽
просто меня реально очень удивляет, что люди пишут мне по поводу персонажей, которых я отдавала 2-3 года назад и спрашивают, можно ли отдать/продать их бро мне ваще пох я даже не помню что рисовала это
❤15💋2❤🔥1
Signed лиза
в чем прикол люди тратят на покупку персонажа 30к и потом боятся, что владелец отберет адопт назад из-за нарушения какого-то тупого правила
❤15💋2❤🔥1
Signed лиза
вам не кажется, что любые правила на адопты это бред
❤15💋1
Signed лиза
скетчевый зеброкирин (тут было лота, пост удален)
❤23🤯5💋2
Signed лиза
скетч реквессттт завтра собираю чемодан и снова еду к f*de s*nsh*ne
❤26🤯7💋4🍓2
Signed лиза
почитать можно отсюда: https://t.me/buvanybu/2753?single я, к сожалению, не была знакома с Олесей, поэтому не мне как-то комментировать эту историю (+ не хочу случайно сказать лишнего). сейчас главное поддержать её семью и близких соболезную
💔19❤2
Signed лиза
Спасибо всем за соболезнования, за ваши добрые слова. Сегодня я была на опознании. Тело сильно пострадало, опознать по нему невозможно, я узнала Олесю по одежде. Её тело прошло страшный путь: 40 километров в потоке, пока не застряло в завале из мусора и деревьев. Мы будем кремировать Олесю. Денег на это хватит из собранных средств. Я не хочу, чтобы жизнь Олеси закончилась так нелепо и бессмысленно. Не хочу, чтобы е…
💔17❤5
Signed лиза
Обновленный пост с реквестами!! Актуален всегда, буду иногда возвращаться к нему — Любые персонажи, кроме людей — С одного человека не более 5 персонажей, альбомы в ВК, каналы и тд не просматриваю. Тойхаус ссылки можно отправить, если там есть какая-то важная инфа или дополнительные референсы/арты Правки в работы не вношу, прост имейте ввиду, что реквесты для меня больше как способ потренироваться......
🔥21🍓6👾5🤯3💋1
Signed лиза
хех))).......
💋24🔥6🍓4🤯2❤🔥1
Signed лиза
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shizoliza111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“шизолиза” (@shizoliza111), 162 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shizoliza111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.