Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

вы заебали спамить!

@shitpostingdao

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,113subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001621749758
TypeChannel
Username@shitpostingdao
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shitpostingdao

Growth

2,1132,1172,1156 August 2026 — 2,116 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,116 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,117 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,113 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,112–2,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:112,113-4
6 Aug 2026, 23:402,117+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:452,116no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:342,116first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

791 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁32441.0%
🤡22728.7%
👍9512.0%
688.60%
🏆617.71%
👀81.01%
🗿40.506%
👾30.379%
🌚10.126%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 791reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 5 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
106
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shitpostingdao. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 February 2025 to 5 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2025, 17:25 UTC≈3,210 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁51👍12🤡91

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

1 Jun 2025, 22:03 UTC≈3,470 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yungq1ddy/status/1929280423290355760 поддержите тред максимально! особенно те, кто получил бан в сакцинкте

👍17😁16🤡93🏆2

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

13 May 2025, 18:43 UTC≈3,780 views52 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

КАК ЖЕ ПЛАКАТЬ БУДУТ ТЕ КТО 3 МЕСЯЦА НАЗАД СПАЛИ))

😁25🤡20👍43

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

22 Apr 2025, 10:22 UTC≈4,070 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁17👀3

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

22 Apr 2025, 10:11 UTC≈3,910 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

давайте все вместе будем сейчас чекать дроп зоры через апи, про которое джейкоб сказал, что это хуйня и цифры там неправильные + математика банально не бьётся, потому что у всех миллион миллионов токенов. нужно быстро чекать и скидывать свои результаты. кто не чекает - даун.

🏆28🤡16😁53

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

13 Apr 2025, 19:54 UTC≈3,590 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ебать заявок в чат накидали. я думал, хули никто ничё не пишет в комментариях. а я, оказывается, включил заявки на чат, чтобы всякие крипто шлюхи со своей рекламой и скамом не заходили в комменты. ладно, набейте мне здесь быстренько 20 клоунов + 30 комментариев и напишу пост о том, что думаю про ос.

🤡616🏆1

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

13 Apr 2025, 19:45 UTC≈2,760 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

по ронину, кстати, 9/10 аккаунтов 1100 хп. затраты на аккаунт были около 0.5$. пока что не буду рассказывать как это было реализовано, но позже дам знать. пока что читайте инфлов, которые залутали по 200 экспы с ебанутыми затратами.

🤡235👍4🏆3🗿1

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

13 Apr 2025, 19:42 UTC≈2,290 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤡10🏆83

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

11 Apr 2025, 08:12 UTC≈2,310 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

а нахуя кто то крутит бэкпак транзами открыл-закрыл если там можно фармить бесплатно просто удержанием позы и/или в лендинге и не въебывать столько денег? или это тоже сложное умозаключение поэтому не додумались?

15🤡13😁6

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

31 Mar 2025, 21:42 UTC≈2,600 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

у фаркастера тоже первое апреля линкедин высрали в подвязки

😁17🤡7

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

27 Mar 2025, 14:47 UTC≈2,920 views37 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

причём: ладно инфлы, им похуй вообще, есть аудитория = есть долбоёбы, которым можно реффку зашиллить и получать кэшбек/поинты, но, блять, я не перестаю удивляться, как легко впарить, прорекламировать абсолютно любую хуйню вчера даунам говорят делать залупу на бск (НА БСК, где НОЛЬ дропов было хороших), а сегодня они уже готовы делать хуйню НА СТАРКНЕТЕ ХАХАХАХАХА почему нельзя просто ПОДУМАТЬ, это единственное что

👍26🏆8🤡21

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

27 Mar 2025, 14:39 UTC≈2,160 views26 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

то есть в чьём то мире для кого то реально отработка ФЬЮЧИЛЬНИ на БСК (не знаю как крупнее ещё выделить, чтобы до всех дошёл абсурд этой хуйни) было охуенной идеей? я даже на их ебаный сайт не заходил ни разу в жизни ждём парадекс теперь да? не менее разъеб площадка не припомню ни 1 проекта в этой сети, который вышел бы хорошим дропом (какие то фантомные рандомные говнопроекты с насыпком на 500 юзеров не считаются)

16👍7🏆3

Signed Oleg 🚫🧢

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shitpostingdao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 186,827 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“вы заебали спамить!” (@shitpostingdao), 2,113 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shitpostingdao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.