Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Shitchain

@shit_chain

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171746279
TypeChannel
Username@shit_chain
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shit_chain

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:4613no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:0813first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 September 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Links
86

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2023 to 26 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Apr 2026, 09:23 UTC47 viewsread 12 August 2026

Temporal — штука, которая не даёт твоему коду умереть на полпути Если ты когда-нибудь писал сценарий типа «спиши деньги → если ок, отправь письмо → если внешний API лежит, повтори через 5 минут → через сутки напомни клиенту», то знаешь, как быстро это превращается в зоопарк из очередей, кронов, статусов в базе и ручных ретраев. Temporal закрывает именно эту боль: ты пишешь обычную функцию на Go / Python / TS, а плат

Signed Mike

11 May 2025, 07:04 UTC98 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤗 OrbStack: бей толстыми образами по худому Docker Desktop и не промахнись! 🎧 Зачем менять уже привычный Docker Desktop? 1. Гул турбин – запускаешь docker ps, а ноутбук превращается в летающую тарелку. 2. Время старта – успеваешь сварить лапшу и поскроллить мемы, пока Desktop раскачивает ВМ. 3. Апдейты-рандомайзеры – "фикс" на 4 ГБ скачался, а теперь ничего не билдится: классика. 4. Electron-корабль – памяти сжирае

Signed Mike

1 May 2025, 21:08 UTC74 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://onecompiler.com/ Дебажим постгрю в облаке

Signed Mike

19 Apr 2025, 19:42 UTC76 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://apidog.com/api-design Кажется, удобная тулза, чтобы проектировать АПИшки в командах

Signed Mike

31 Mar 2024, 20:35 UTC64 viewsread 12 August 2026

Или одна впсочка и на ней порядочек и баш скрипьы

Signed Konstantin N5N

30 Mar 2024, 13:58 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @linkmeup_podcast

Всё самое интересное опять случилось ночью, пока вы спали. Интернет штормит на 10 из 10 по CVE: скомпрометированы примерно все ssh-сервера на debian-like через подломленный репозиторий xz и библиотечку liblzma. А как так, спросишь ты? openssh никак не используется liblzma. Но есть нюанс: шапка, федора и прочие дебианы патчат openssh для совместимости c нотификациями systemd, и вот такая вот петрушка. Автор кода – мол

Signed Mike

29 Mar 2024, 09:11 UTC20 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @notboring_techPhoto

🕸️ DeepMind и Стэнфорд в новой работе отучили Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude и другие нейросети ошибаться, придумывать факты и галлюцинировать. Нашел самые интересные выводы из исследования: • Новый алгоритм SAFE делает фактчек любого своего ответа — разбивает на части, гуглит и подводит итог. Оказалось, что бот проверяет факты гораздо лучше людей и в 20 раз дешевле человека! • Чем крупнее LLM-модель — тем лучше она знает

Signed Mike

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shit_chain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Oct 2023, 12:52 UTCAnonymous Poll577 voters

Как там у вас с дискриминацией? Она уже на научной основе?

  1. Ощущаете ли вы превосходство по знаниям над другими?32%
  2. Получаете ли вы удовольствие от такого превосходства?26%
  3. Ощущаете ли вы превосходство других программистов над вами по знаниям?59%
  4. Страдаете ли чувством неполноценности от превосходства других?51%

The shares total 168%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2023 to 26 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shitchain” (@shit_chain), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shit_chain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.