https://t.me/devxfunbot?start=link_shilltalk

Channel
⭕️🔴 ShillTalk 🔴⭕️
@shilltalk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,030subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001365191879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shilltalk |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shilltalk |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 1,030 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 1,035 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 1,035 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍌 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2024 to 26 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
got s free listing codes for @CTOTrends, first 3 to comment get it
Bobo on SUI, aped https://t.me/BoboOnSui https://dexscreener.com/sui/0xf97934f8cebdd1db762cc568d4946008c7e566c21a1df9650ee88cb9ae29013d
PROFIT AI • LAUNCHING TODAY (08/29) • 9PM UTC⭐️ By tracking and mimicking the trades of the most successful wallets, users can significantly increase their potential returns. Profit AI saves users the time and effort required for extensive market research and analysis, providing actionable insights instantly. Holders Instantly Gain Access to a huge Database of the most profitable wallets & trading tactics. ⌛Real-Ti…
$SHEEP Good content, just launched. Gamble https://dexscreener.com/solana/73nbeynoszcw2xxkty8ynzngohdrc7s1rxxg9h6dz2ph
$MEPE Unique art, Just went launch, OG ticker based on Milady hype 0x5FF70c0EA3bd71B4149E1f047c5FbAf11EdC8758 https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xe37100fd6c1a7afd6eced5ea91d7dd1d5129e74a?t=1719779661756 https://t.me/MEPEerc20
What derivatives of Pepe we have? Andy Brett etc right? But that's not real derivative. Real derivative is futures, options etc right? This is $PEPEUSDT, the only regulated derivative of $PEPE. Decide yourself if it's bullish or not... I aped and gonna hold to death
0x55932ABEc6D9BC1B4ea3cf09162d75f9d9EA0b81
$PEPEUSDT Narrative is it's literally Pepe derivative https://t.me/PepePerpetualFutures https://x.com/pepeperpetual https://pepeperpetual.xyz/ https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x775f7883a50979ef42f5e338d14118f9c62c2557?t=1719678105576
$BEBE Potential first mover. just launched and in post launch dip, dev is active 0x2A33ab3eF0594244E8fEd02EB1e95aDb45aE5027 https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x54fab7bc16399fe57d37cd6a959adfb59fc97942 Tele: https://t.me/bebecoyn X: https://x.com/bebecoyn Website: https://bebecoyn.xyz/
Aped, good holders 90k https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x25f214226dc15d1ac615fe838a5bb7dc7c209a1e?t=1719417005910
🤚☘️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shilltalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@shilltalk named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⭕️🔴 ShillTalk 🔴⭕️” (@shilltalk), 1,030 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shilltalk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.