Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shikshak Selection Hub

Channel

Shikshak Selection Hub

@shikshak_selection_hub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,814subscribers

-271 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001574995668
TypeChannel
Username@shikshak_selection_hub
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shikshak_selection_hub

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,81410,0859,949.58 August 2026 — 10,085 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,081 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,076 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,070 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,065 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,060 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,054 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,046 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,037 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,027 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,019 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,014 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,012 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,998 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,979 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,968 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,938 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,915 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,872 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,837 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,814 subscribers8 August 202617 September 2026
21 measurements spanning 40 days, net -271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,773–10,126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:159,814-23
13 Sept 2026, 12:389,837-35
9 Sept 2026, 12:589,872-43
4 Sept 2026, 05:429,915-23
1 Sept 2026, 00:579,938-30
28 Aug 2026, 20:539,968-11
26 Aug 2026, 01:339,979-19
23 Aug 2026, 10:079,998-14
21 Aug 2026, 22:0510,012-2
20 Aug 2026, 16:2610,014-5
19 Aug 2026, 16:5610,019-8
18 Aug 2026, 18:5210,027-10
17 Aug 2026, 15:3610,037-9
16 Aug 2026, 08:5210,046-8
14 Aug 2026, 18:5610,054-6
13 Aug 2026, 09:0410,060-5
12 Aug 2026, 07:5410,065-5
11 Aug 2026, 09:5210,070-6
10 Aug 2026, 10:4510,076-5
9 Aug 2026, 12:0110,081first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.18%
avg views ÷ 9,814 subscribers
Avg views / post
312
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held95 (27 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total4,989
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC116 viewsread 29 August 2026

UGC NET FINAL ANSWER KEY OUT 🔥 https://examinationservices.nic.in/ExamSys26Part2/Root/CandidateLogin.aspx?enc=Ei4cajBkK1gZSfgr53ImFV/yIzhTZHBze3wooSg9Djgija2T1vzGc16BomrI4u26

28 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTCviews —

Shikshak Selection Hub pinned «🚀 Testbook Super Pass Live (12 Months) :https://link.testbook.com/12MSANDEEP»

28 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC128 viewsread 29 August 2026

🚀 Testbook Super Pass Live (12 Months) :https://link.testbook.com/12MSANDEEP

28 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTCviews —

Shikshak Selection Hub pinned «https://youtube.com/shorts/AHOLz_pdkOg?si=VWydI6DpRrLxrMw2»

26 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC357 viewsread 29 August 2026

*UPTET 2026 Result Out Link* - https://www.upessc.net/upessctetresults/login.aspx

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @shikshak_selection_hub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

What number should come next in the series: 81, 64, 49, 36, ?

  1. 2581%
  2. 270%
  3. 217%
  4. 3011%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

Find the odd one out?

  1. Orange 🍊3%
  2. Potato 🥔90%
  3. Apple 🍎3%
  4. Mango 🥭3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

A is the mother of B. B is the sister of C. D is the father of C. How is A related to D?

  1. Sister9%
  2. Mother5%
  3. Wife73%
  4. Daughter14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

If in a certain code language, REASON is coded as SFBTPO, how is THINK coded in that language?

  1. UIJOL72%
  2. UHIOL6%
  3. UHJPL17%
  4. VHKOL6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

What number should come next in the series? 2, 5, 10, 17, 26,?

  1. 350%
  2. 3788%
  3. 398%
  4. 414%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sanskritganga संस्कृतगंगा
@sanskritganga · 48,796
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
Danish Sheikh
@Danishsheikh24 · 46,352
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shikshak Selection Hub” (@shikshak_selection_hub), 9,814 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shikshak_selection_hub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.