希望新干军不要讨厌被教皇破坏的地图,让我们加强新干军的团结,一起去月球吧 🔥🔥🔥

Channel
新灿通证 Smartdefi
@shichan_CN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001355198944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shichan_CN |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shichan_CN |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 5 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 5 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 20.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 13.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2022 to 29 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
新灿通证 Smartdefi pinned a photo
我们在中国有很多旅游景点,我们会用这个sincan代币作为支付手段,我们和中国的大公司有合作😘❤❤❤ wait for deal sponsor guys🔥🔥🔥
🔥2
🥰🥰🥰 Gooo boom💣
🔥3
Video, posted without a caption
新灿通证 Smartdefi pinned a photo
重要的提醒🎉 现在在 FEGEX 上直播 MEME 代币! 辛坎 SD 🔥 看一下这个! 看起来很适合这个! 代尔! 📈 FEGEX 的实时图表: https://beta.fegex.com/charts/trade/swap/bsc/0x91DB64f5D4695EEb9D531E3da6A4A67B39038494 电报群: https://t.me/sincansd 电报频道: https://t.me/shichan_CN 🌐网站 : https://www.sincan.online (Update soon)😍
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
我们将和我们的小家人一起飞向月球,我们非常爱辛坎家族,成为辛坎令牌家族的一员 ❤❤❤🤝🤝
👍1🥰1
今晚会有新的ath sincan token,不要错过sincan Army,进图位置很漂亮,logo正在处理中,我们会尽快更新网站 !!!! ❤❤❤😘🥰
🥰1
我们已经看到了一切,我们确认Sincan纯粹是来自中国的项目,我们网站的问题是我们不知道我们的网站看起来像baby ape & sants 😂 我们的华人社区很强大 保持钻石持有人 ❤❤❤🔥
https://bscscan.com/tx/0x15f3fd7cebdf639b56735f4b52faf640f00544ff5f11d15d4a7081a2ed09b23d Done burn (35.6) Sincan 🔥🔥🔥❤
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @shichan_CN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,196,990 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新灿通证 Smartdefi” (@shichan_CN), 5 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shichan_CN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.