Channel
@shiba
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,939subscribers
-117 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001276696979 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shiba |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shiba |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 12,939 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 12,944 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 12,952 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 12,958 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 12,966 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 12,970 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 12,983 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 12,988 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 12,997 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 13,004 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 13,014 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 13,018 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 13,022 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 13,029 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 13,038 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 13,050 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 13,049 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 13,056 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
119 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 74.8% | |
| 🏆 | 17 | 14.3% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 4.20% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.52% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.68% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.68% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 4 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐶 Whale Participation Adds Mild Optimism but Also Risk Large SHIB wallet addresses have shown increased accumulation recently, which may signal cautiously bullish sentiment among major holders. However, the presence of whales also introduces risk of sudden large-scale selling if the price moves unfavorably. While the accumulation may underpin a potential move, it does not guarantee one. Traders should consider whale…
❤45🏆3👎3👌2
🐶 SHIB’s Path to $0.0001 Remains Highly Speculative The long-beloved target of $0.0001 for SHIB remains on many community wishlists, but analysts view it as highly speculative under current conditions. Reaching it would require a dramatic surge in demand and massive reduction in token supply — both sizable challenges. Most realistic medium-term targets are far lower, reflecting supply constraints and market realitie…
❤11🏆1
🐶 Macro and Geopolitical Uncertainty Add Headwinds Global risk factors like trade tensions and regulatory developments are creating headwinds for high-beta assets including SHIB. In times of market stress, meme coins often suffer as risk-off sentiment dominates. Analysts warn that until broader risk appetite returns, SHIB may struggle for sustained gains. The coin’s performance remains tied not just to its own narra…
❤6🍾1
🐶 SHIB Community Still Active Amid Price Stagnation Despite the recent price stagnation, the SHIB community remains engaged with development, governance talks and ecosystem updates. Project leads have reiterated that long-term utility development is ongoing and that holders should remain patient. Social media activity remains high, reflecting that interest hasn’t evaporated. For many, SHIB is more a long-term “commu…
❤2🏆1
🐶 Technical Pressure Mounts as SHIB Tests Critical Support On the charts, SHIB is hovering above key support levels and below major resistance bands, creating a tense scenario for traders. If support breaks decisively, downside risk could accelerate; conversely, a breakout would signal renewed upside potential. Momentum indicators remain weak, signaling caution. Some short-term traders are stepping back until confir…
❤4🏆2
🐶 While Burn Activity Grows, Large Supply Remains Barrier SHIB burn metrics have shown spikes in recent days, demonstrating increased token destruction efforts by the community. Despite this, the sheer number of tokens in circulation continues to limit upward price potential. Some analysts argue that real supply reduction must accelerate to move the needle meaningfully. The burn narrative provides morale but not imm…
💩2❤1🍾1
🐶 Bullish Forecasts for SHIB Could Depend on Key Breakout Some market projections suggest SHIB could deliver a substantial rally if it breaks out of current resistance zones. Targets in the range of several-times current price are being discussed — though with low probability given supply and liquidity constraints. The consensus is that without a strong catalyst, SHIB will continue to trade sideways. The burn narrat…
❤1
🐶 SHIB Faces Growing Competition from Utility-Driven Tokens Emerging altcoins with utility features are beginning to attract attention that might otherwise have gone to SHIB. Analysts highlight that new projects are offering staking, DeFi integration and lower supply — aspects SHIB is still developing. Though SHIB has strong brand recognition and community, staying relevant may require more than nostalgia. Some inve…
❤2🏆1
🐶 Extended Consolidation Period Could Precede Explosive Move SHIB has been in a prolonged consolidation phase spanning many months, mirroring previous patterns that preceded large rallies. Analysts suggest that after long periods of low volatility, the next move could be significant if the situation aligns. Historical behavior indicates that SHIB often “leaves it late” before upping performance. While some models fo…
❤1🍾1
🐶 SHIB Netflow Turns Bullish with Significant Exchange Outflows On-chain data shows SHIB’s net exchange flow recently turned sharply negative, indicating that large volumes of SHIB are being withdrawn from exchanges. Negative netflow is often interpreted as accumulation behavior, as tokens leave trading platforms into long-term wallets. This development could mark the early stage of renewed buying interest and hold …
🐶 SHIB Underperforming Despite Growing Optimism Even with renewed optimism in the crypto market, SHIB has stalled and failed to break major resistance levels. Market analysts note that other coins are stealing the show while SHIB lags behind in momentum and new catalysts. Its large circulating supply and lack of high-profile upgrades are cited as reasons for the hesitation. Some investors are questioning whether SHI…
❤5
🐶 SHIB Gains Institutional Spotlight Amid ETF Filing Shiba Inu has recently been included in a proposed U.S. Active Crypto ETF filing by a major investment manager, putting SHIB alongside top assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This move signals growing institutional recognition of SHIB beyond its meme-coin status. If approved, the incorporation into a regulated fund could widen exposure and credibility for SHIB. The …
❤4🏆3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shiba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,072,420 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shiba Inu (Shib)” (@shiba), 12,939 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shiba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.