Channel
@shiZazelo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002249073216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shiZazelo |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shiZazelo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 76 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 76 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 19 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
478 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5397862013680504274 | 85 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5438224604499819092 | 79 | 16.5% | |
| custom 5359602174424785826 | 77 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5312168143290907819 | 54 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5307877840329388349 | 51 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5337199783922641650 | 45 | 9.41% | |
| custom 5386862245953173232 | 40 | 8.37% | |
| custom 5397602666375306690 | 35 | 7.32% | |
| custom 5334725814040674667 | 12 | 2.51% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 478reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 28 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shiZazelo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 October 2025 to 28 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Йоу, если меня кто-то потерял, то я за это время отлетела в дурку и сбежала из неё, сейчас пытаюсь собраться с мыслями ахаха, вот прикладываю чета я карякала на дитус, я там уже была на грани, а как закончила , так и отъехала аххаха, в итоге не поучаствовала вообще 🙂 Простите я псих
custom 538686224595317323217custom 530787784032938834913custom 54382246044998190929custom 53347258140406746671custom 53596021744247858261
Нашла старый артик, среди всех моих скетчей он выглядел очень необычно и несвойственно мне. Хочу его скажем так дорисовать, прям с сохранением всех деталей, но некоторые линии просто не дают мне этого и вызывают вопросы че это вообще.. И просто почему чел в каких-то стрингах Почему у него табалапки вместо ног, хвост и ушки, но при этом эльфийские уши и какой-то рог.. он химера?? Что это за женщина и почему она гол…
custom 543822460449981909213custom 535960217442478582611custom 53978620136805042749custom 53371997839226416502
Когда попросил парикмахера подровнять кончики
custom 539760266637530669010custom 53596021744247858267custom 54382246044998190926custom 53371997839226416501
(КРОВЬ чуть чуть) Ностальгия в глаз попала, решила наскетчить своего старого перса🥰 Ему маньяка ручки ножки отчикал ахахах✌️ Также посидела порефлексировала , раньше всегда рисовала мальчиков и плоских женщин, а сейчас рисую почти только сисястых женщин, возмутилась и села рисовать мужчину))) Также мечтаю вернуться к этим персонажам, у меня там целая история и вселенная хыхы
custom 539786201368050427410custom 53596021744247858269custom 53371997839226416508
хочу взять пять реквестов на подобное за добавление одного чувачка в тгк или же репост в комменты кидайте пруфчики на то что вы репостнули или же добавили чела сюда и подписаны на меня и перса которого хотите что бы я накалякала и еще из за учебы постараюсь отрисовать всех за месяц 1. @i7_love_you0 2. @Ksenia_12_11 3.киткат 4. @hh1rosh 5.
custom 53371997839226416509custom 53978620136805042741
5-ти лапковые коты🙂
custom 543822460449981909212custom 53978620136805042748custom 53976026663753066907custom 53371997839226416501
РЕБЯТА, я родила🫴 В последнее время я что-то много пробую нового для себя.. Чтож думаю для первого раза, вообще впервые программу открыв, вышло очень даже неплохо🤭 Жду ваших реакций и мыслей:) У кого есть тиктоке можете зайти поддержать меня лайком ахаха - https://www.tiktok.com/@shizazelo/video/7566605080774970646?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7563747246131381792 https://youtube.com/shorts/ceUIJUP19B8?…
custom 535960217442478582612custom 53121681432909078197custom 54382246044998190927custom 53371997839226416503
Я оказывается прошляляпила год каналу🐹
custom 538686224595317323213custom 533472581404067466711custom 53978620136805042748custom 53371997839226416502
🟠🟠🟠 🟠🟠🟠🟠🟠🟠🟠🟠🟠🟠 😊Вот такие скины я придумала моим пупсякам у Хеллоуину😊 Также я решила попробовать их оформить, впервые это делаю, не судите строго😨 (парилась не прям сильно, чисто пнгшек с браузера натыкала, но и основной целью было просто попробовать себя в этом)
custom 530787784032938834913custom 535960217442478582612custom 53121681432909078198custom 53978620136805042741
Закончила малявку, теперь делаю момми, накидываю спойлеров🤭 Молюсь, что завтра закончу, а то растянула это на 3 дня, а хотела за 1
custom 539786201368050427412custom 543822460449981909212custom 531216814329090781910
Мьюшки, что остались со мной и следят за мной, спасибо Вам большое, я Вас всех очень люблю💞💞💞
custom 539760266637530669013custom 543822460449981909211custom 53978620136805042747
Биг Буба Резе🥺
custom 530787784032938834916custom 531216814329090781910custom 53978620136805042746custom 53596021744247858263custom 53371997839226416501
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @shiZazelo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 886,449 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@shiZazelo named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ShiZazelo🐀Радиоактивная крыса” (@shiZazelo), 76 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shiZazelo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.