Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌞 Школьный Дневник ШГШ / Новости и Факты ШГШ

Channel

🌞 Школьный Дневник ШГШ / Новости и Факты ШГШ

@shgsh_novosti

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

52,644subscribers

-1,847 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002273818480
TypeChannel
Username@shgsh_novosti
Description⛱️ ЛЕТО С ШГШ: ЭКСКЛЮЗИВЫ И СПОЙЛЕРЫ К СЕРИЯМ! 🌻 Свежие Новости. Инсайды, все о ШГШ! 🌊 Жизнь Актеров ШГШ, лагерь в Болгарии! 🎬 Полные Серии ШГШ! Сотрудничество/реклама: @Diggsale @reklama_nikita @hladenkocoop @santizmedia Предложка: @sgsh_novostiBot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shgsh_novosti

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

52,64455,34453,9947 August 2026 — 54,491 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,491 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,447 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,325 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,220 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,112 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,989 subscribers13 August 2026 — 53,885 subscribers14 August 2026 — 53,740 subscribers16 August 2026 — 53,582 subscribers17 August 2026 — 53,443 subscribers18 August 2026 — 53,358 subscribers19 August 2026 — 53,248 subscribers20 August 2026 — 54,253 subscribers21 August 2026 — 54,457 subscribers23 August 2026 — 55,344 subscribers25 August 2026 — 55,198 subscribers25 August 2026 — 55,073 subscribers27 August 2026 — 55,018 subscribers28 August 2026 — 54,934 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,836 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,734 subscribers31 August 2026 — 54,634 subscribers1 September 2026 — 54,526 subscribers2 September 2026 — 54,413 subscribers3 September 2026 — 54,271 subscribers5 September 2026 — 54,097 subscribers8 September 2026 — 53,764 subscribers11 September 2026 — 53,470 subscribers13 September 2026 — 53,281 subscribers14 September 2026 — 53,115 subscribers16 September 2026 — 52,886 subscribers19 September 2026 — 52,644 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,847. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,239–55,749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:0052,644-242
16 Sept 2026, 13:5752,886-229
14 Sept 2026, 14:4153,115-166
13 Sept 2026, 04:1753,281-189
11 Sept 2026, 08:4053,470-294
8 Sept 2026, 10:3753,764-333
5 Sept 2026, 07:4254,097-174
3 Sept 2026, 10:1154,271-142
2 Sept 2026, 03:3654,413-113
1 Sept 2026, 03:4454,526-108
31 Aug 2026, 00:0754,634-100
29 Aug 2026, 22:5554,734-102
29 Aug 2026, 01:3754,836-98
28 Aug 2026, 01:4854,934-84
27 Aug 2026, 02:0255,018-55
25 Aug 2026, 22:5655,073-125
25 Aug 2026, 00:0355,198-146
23 Aug 2026, 08:5755,344+887
21 Aug 2026, 21:0954,457+204
20 Aug 2026, 16:1254,253first reading

Engagement

364 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 52,644 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,940
230 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
231
of 364 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held364 (5 August 202623 September 2026)
Views total1,367,110
Reactions total57,988
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,820
Videos
1,440
Links
1,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 21m
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

96,970 reactions across 363 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
81,67484.2%
🔥5,9806.17%
👍5,7615.94%
👎1,1381.17%
😁5630.581%
🤔3580.369%
🤯3530.364%
custom 53864435167065848993080.318%
💔2050.211%
😢1630.168%
🤬1120.115%
😈880.091%
🗿690.071%
🤗610.063%
🫡550.057%
😍490.051%
🌚330.034%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 363 of the 364 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96,970 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 364 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
69
across the posts below
Posts paid on
32
of 363 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shgsh_novosti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 364 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC≈3,710 views204 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

• Самая грустная серия 8-го сезона😢: #серии От первого лица: Школа 8 😮‍💨 МАМА ЖИВА 🥹 РАЗБОРКИ с БАБКОЙ 😨 НОЧНАЯ РОМАНТИКА ГЛАЗАМИ ШКОЛЬНИКА А какую серию вы считаете самой грустной в ШГШ? Пишите свои версии в комментариях!👇

191🔥7👍6

23 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC≈4,420 views173 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

• Интересный факт о ШГШ! Фанат ШГШ заметил очень интересную деталь при повторном просмотре! #факты Недавно один из фанатов ШГШ отличился своей внимательностью и рассказал всем, что заметил интересное совпадение при повторном просмотре серий. А именно: в 6 серии 2 сезона, на 5:15, Саша то ли в шутку, то ли всерьёз спросил у учителя: «Получается, Дима и Наташа будут мужем и женой?». Возможно, тогда Саша и не знал, что

163👍5🔥2🗿1🤬1😢1

23 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC≈4,280 views143 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Угадай правильный факт про наш любимый сериал! #факты 3 ПРАВДЫ ✅ / 3 ЛЖИ ❌ → 1 факт: У Ильи есть две собаки → 2 факт: Ксюша сначала проходила кастинг на "тяжёлый люкс" → 3 факт: Любимая игра Макса это Fortnite → 4 факт: Дерзкий был в Диснейленде → 5 факт: Дима в детстве занимался футболом → 6 факт: У ШГШ не было мерча до недавнего момента. Какие из этих фактов действительно правдивы, а какие - ложные? Угадаешь

135👍5🔥3

23 Sept 2026, 10:11 UTC≈4,140 views163 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🤔 Как изменится школа в 9 сезоне? Узнаем ли мы нашу любимую школу? 😀 После последних стримов Руслана мы уже знаем, что школу немного обновят. Например, в ней полностью переделают туалет - судя по показанным кадрам, там будут граффити и даже подсветка. Правда, пока неизвестно, останется ли эта подсветка непосредственно в сериале или она была нужна только для съёмок. Также Руслан показывал, что сейчас идёт работа над

155👍5🔥2👎1

23 Sept 2026, 06:59 UTC≈4,210 views222 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Монтажное утро, Дневник ШГШ! ☀ Руслан уже готовит вам 9-й сезон, и вот как это происходит:

208👍10🔥4

22 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈4,960 views207 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

⚡️Вечерний стрим с Димой уже начался! Заходи на стрим, пообщайся в чате и проведи вечер вместе с Димой. → СТРИМ НА ТВИЧЕ: ТВИЧ

202👍3🔥2

22 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC≈5,110 views197 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

✅/❌ Правда или фейк? ✅/❌ ➜ Ловите 3 «факта» о сериале и актерах. Но один из них - чистая ложь! Сможете угадать, какой именно? 1. Правда или фейк: Дима однажды пришёл в школу в костюме курицы? 2. Правда или фейк: Один из героев ШГШ однажды провёл целый день в школе, притворяясь учителем? 3. Правда или фейк: Во время съёмок актёр случайно сломал школьный стул, и эту сцену оставили в сериале? ➜ Пишите в комментариях

187😁7🔥3

22 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC≈4,920 views198 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

• Рандомная теория о ШГШ #теории Возможно, ШГШ закончится на хорошей ноте, и в 9 сезоне Дима после решения всех своих проблем наконец-то сможет нормально жить, особенно после получения наследства от своего отца. Если Наташа действительно беременна и всё-таки решит оставить ребёнка, то она может родить именно на 18-летие Димы. Тогда за деньги из наследства он может организовать им с Наташей свадьбу, а после свадьбы о

189🔥5👍2🗿2

22 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC≈4,680 views351 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Ждем возвращения на выпускной?❤️‍🩹

330👍13🔥6👎2

22 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC≈5,400 views180 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🤔 Смогут ли Дима и Вика помириться? Смогут ли их отношения измениться в 9 сезоне? 🔥 Как мы помним, у Димы и Вики не совсем хорошие отношения. Всё началось с картинной галереи, где Вика и её подруги высмеяли Диму из-за того, что он не из богатой семьи. Позже их вторая встреча тоже прошла не гладко - Дима пригрозил, что если они ещё раз подойдут к Ксюше, то он их изобьёт. Но во 2 серии 8 сезона мы узнаём, что Вика - с

168🤔6😁3👎2🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 07:48 UTC≈5,430 views275 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, Р Г Ш!🙂

266🔥6👍2🤬1

21 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC≈6,440 views343 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Прайм Камрана.. ❤️‍🔥

314👍13🔥11👎4😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 364 posts we hold for @shgsh_novosti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@shgsh_novosti edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 September 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTCAnonymous Poll2,240 voters approx.

Чего вы больше всего ждёте от 9 сезона?

  1. Пальчик станет новым классным класса🫪7%
  2. Возвращение легендарного персонажа😉42%
  3. Выпускной✨3%
  4. Лицо Димы📹26%
  5. Бой Ксюши и Наташи за Диму🔥13%
  6. Родители Димы откажутся от него😒2%
  7. Камран выйдет на свободу и замутит с Милккисс😈7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,170 voters approx.

Вспомним 7 сезон: что сделал Дима, когда начал встречаться с двумя девушками одновременно? 🤔

  1. Испугался и сразу всё рассказал 😶11%
  2. Сделал вид, что ничего не произошло 😏32%
  3. Начал бегать за другой 😉31%
  4. Продолжил жить как раньше 😎14%
  5. Отшил сразу двоих 🤷‍♀️12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll1,580 voters approx.

Как вы думаете, из-за чего Дима чаще всего оказывается в центре проблем?

  1. Его вспыльчивый характер 😡35%
  2. Девушки 💁‍♀️34%
  3. Ненависть со стороны бабушки 👵15%
  4. Желание помочь всем вокруг 🫶64%
  5. Просто не везёт 😶22%

The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Sept 2026, 10:41 UTCAnonymous Poll2,220 voters approx.

🤔Если бы вы могли изменить ОДНО событие в ШГШ, что бы вы выбрали?

  1. Уход Рашиды👩‍🏫31%
  2. Расставание Димы и Ксюши❤️‍🩹26%
  3. ДТП мамы Димы🚑19%
  4. Уход Полины👩🏻20%
  5. Поведение Камрана😈3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 364 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌞 Школьный Дневник ШГШ / Новости и Факты ШГШ” (@shgsh_novosti), 52,644 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shgsh_novosti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.