Channel
@sherzod_erk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
234subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001744808190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sherzod_erk |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sherzod_erk |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 234 | +3 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 231 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 234 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 233 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 234 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 233 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 236 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 236 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
198 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 105 | 53.0% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 26.8% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 5.56% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Баъзан режалар бузилганда, бу жуда оғир туюлади. Чунки биз ўша йўлга умид боғлаган бўламиз. Лекин вақт ўтиб, айрим тўхташлар бошқача манзилни кўрсатганини англаймиз. Ҳар бир ёқмаган ҳолатнинг маъноси дарров очилмайди, аммо у ҳам йўлингиздаги муҳим белги бўлиши мумкин. https://t.me/sherzod_erk
❤1👍1
Баъзан одамнинг кайфияти йўқ эмас — у шунчаки ичида нима бўлаётганини тушунмайди. Ғазабни яширади, ранжишни сукут деб атайди, қўрқувни эса бепарволик ортига беркитади. Кейин шу ҳислар оғир сўз ёки кераксиз жанжал бўлиб чиқади. Ўзингга рост бўлиш оддий сўздан бошланади: «Мен ранжидим», «мен қўрқяпман», «менга оғир». Ҳисга ном берилса, у енгиллашади. Инсон ўзини тушунса, бошқаларни душман қилишга ҳам шошилмайди. http…
❤4
Бу расмдаги оқ ва қора отлар рақиб эмас — бир инсоннинг ичидаги икки овоз. Оқ от унинг дунёга кўринадиган юзи: меҳри, орзуси, яхши нияти. Қора от эса яширилган сояси: қўрқуви, ранжиши, ғазаби. Уларнинг орасидаги қизил сукут — қалбнинг жим кураши. Шахмат тахтаси эса умр майдони: ҳар оқ катак — умид, ҳар қора катак — сабоқ. Соясидан қочган одам уни бошқалардан қидиради. Соясига қарашга журъат қилган одам эса, ниҳоят,…
👍8🔥4❤1
Муносабатлар нархи — «мен ҳақман» деган ғурурни қўйиб, «биз муҳиммиз» дея олишдир. У вақт, эътибор, ишонч ва кечирим билан тўланади. https://t.me/sherzod_erk
❤3👍3🔥2
Маъно — инсон қилаётган ишининг нима учун кераклигини ҳис қилишидир. У лавозим ёки катта сўзлар билан келмайди. Агар бу саволга жавоб бўлмаса, одам ишга танаси билан келади-ю, қалби эрталабданоқ дам олишга чиқиб кетади. Шунинг учун баъзан ўзидан: «Мен буни нега қиляпман?» деб сўраш керак. Жавоб топилса, иш ҳам енгилроқ, кун ҳам маънолироқ бўлади. https://t.me/sherzod_erk
❤4👍4
Posted without readable text
Хаёл илҳом беради. Ҳаёт етиштириб қўяди. Бирида орзу туғилади, иккинчисида инсон. https://t.me/sherzod_erk
❤6👍5
Эшитиш ва тинглаш ўртасида катта фарқ бор. Эшитиш учун қулоқ кифоя. Тинглаш учун эса камтарлик керак. Кўпчилик гапни эшитади, лекин маъносини тингламайди. Чунки улар тушуниш учун эмас, жавоб бериш учун қулоқ тутади. Чаласавод инсоннинг энг катта муаммоси ҳам шу. У сўзни эшитади, аммо фикрни қабул қилмайди. Унинг ичи аллақачон ўз жавоблари билан тўлиб бўлгани учун янги ҳақиқатга жой қолмайди. Ҳақиқий илм эса тингл…
👍13
Channel photo updated
Устозлик — ортидан эргаштириш санъати эмас. Инсонни ўз йўлини ўзи топадиган даражага етказиш масъулиятидир. https://t.me/sherzod_erk
👍7🔥1🥰1
Энг қиммат чипта — чет элга эмас, эски “мен”дан чиқишга сотиб олинади. Чунки эски “мен” — бу эски фикрлар, эски қўрқувлар ва бир хил одатлар йиғиндиси. Инсонни ўзгартирадиган нарса масофа эмас, нигоҳнинг ўзгаришидир. Ҳақиқий саёҳат янги мамлакатдан эмас, янги тафаккурдан бошланади. https://t.me/sherzod_erk
👍8❤3🥰2
«Одамнинг қалби бир бўлгани билан, унинг шайтони ҳар хил…» Қуръонда шайтон инсоннинг очиқ душмани экани баён қилинган. Аммо у инсонни мажбурламайди — фақат унинг заиф нуқтасидан васваса қилади. Шунинг учун ҳам ҳар бир инсоннинг имтиҳони турлича. Бирини ғазаб, бошқасини ҳасад, яна бирини бойлик ёки мансаб синайди. Инсонни синови билан эмас, балки ўша синовда қилган танлови билан баҳолаш керак. Чунки ҳақиқий ғалаба …
👍5❤3🔥2🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sherzod_erk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sherzod Erkaboev” (@sherzod_erk), 234 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sherzod_erk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.