深圳米雪儿🏠 #白昕昕 🐯满18岁学妹,学长 下课一起回家吗纯新人首开 第一天抵达体验感超棒 👍 好评选手07年160D身高,体重是100斤我喜欢各种姿势 重要的是服务一流 喜欢哥哥的大鸡巴含在口里用舌尖轻轻的吮吸我在等你 #福田 #小纯 #推荐 本频道唯一客服 @jingji8

Channel
深圳修车🔞精品总群
@shenzhen345
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,008subscribers
+85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002491790421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shenzhen345 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shenzhen345 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 4,008 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 3,992 | +10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 3,982 | +16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 3,966 | +15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 3,951 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 3,950 | +12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 3,938 | +13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 3,925 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 3,923 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.37%
- avg views ÷ 4,008 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14.8
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 89 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 09s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
深圳米雪儿🏠 #苏涵桐 白虎165-03-天然🐻E小巧玲珑上粉下嫩80斤敏感体质水多🔥好,馒头逼一线天可轻度全身雪白无纹身服务好性格温柔瘦小胸大漫画身材🉑双非,🉑口豹🉑🚗震,毒龙,宛式服务,情趣衣服,轻度sm女王女奴 #福田 #小纯 #推荐 #sm 本频道唯一客服 @jingji8
深圳米雪儿🏠 #米朵金 承诺超甜超纯超白超粉的乖巧女 167D 06年 98斤喜欢圆脸的福音韩系甜美☆天然无娃娃脸完美身材皮肤细滑白嫩 声音奶萌奶萌敏感体质易湿 外表娇羞 服务超好期待素质哥哥 🈶jk 丝袜 #福田 #萝莉 #推荐 本频道唯一客服 @jingji8
🇨🇳雨泽🏠深圳南山06极品白小纯萝莉佳佳 编号:#B251 #南山 #萝莉 💝 纯天然妈生脸,甜甜的初恋感 期待与你相遇~ 💝年龄/Age 06 💝身高/Height 167 💝胸围/Bust C 💝体重/weight 91 💝人听话有耐心,嘴甜会夸😁 💝皮肤细腻 滑嫩 💝身体柔软 配合默契度极高 💝温柔可爱L c初恋女友感声 💝 清纯与性感并存,长相甜美服务主动,极致反差给你极致般的舒适体验 🉑69 🉑🐍😘 🉑🚗 暑期兼职不常在 所见即所得 真人真照 真人真照 真人真照 本人生活照 本频道唯一客服 @jingji8
🇨🇳雨泽🏠深圳福田08小雅白虎 三点粉 cos Lolita 雪白 🉑ytwt 四川人 编号:#B252 #福田 初次兼职🎬 只接受高素质哥哥的投喂🍒 08年 白虎 🐻c 深圳第一嫩逼 有纹身 🎀刚破处 体质敏感 易湿会吸娇喘 🎀主动配合100% 自动摇摇机 榨汁机 🍹 痉挛高潮一触即发♡瘦瘦小小90斤 净165C身高求爸爸抱抱干我 🎀 待哥哥如初恋般热情 主动口 主动求干 爱爱叫声超甜🥰 ♡本人温柔体贴可爱大方♡好评满满🙂 ♡求哥哥给一次机会让我好好服务您♡ ♡ 照片为本人实拍生活照 所見即所得♡ 0整 多套Cos JK Lolita 暂需提前预定 🉑私人订制雪白 本频道唯一客服 @jingji8
🇨🇳雨泽🏠深圳南山硬5空姐 真空🉑跟飞 编号:#B254 #空姐 #硬5 深圳短开 硬5️⃣ 🇨🇳中国海南航 真实空姐 证件全套 🌈 五官精致 温柔体贴 🌈 情商高 不吸烟 白嫩皮肤 🌈爱好瑜伽 普拉提 旅游 Height身高 :175 Weight体重:50 🐻真实cup:F 机舱服务五星好评 🎬期待与你解锁更多 本频道唯一客服 @jingji8
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @shenzhen345. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 643,756 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳修车🔞精品总群” (@shenzhen345), 4,008 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shenzhen345.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.