Channel
@sheitan_hastam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,168subscribers
-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001624358757 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sheitan_hastam |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sheitan_hastam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 3,168 | -18 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 3,186 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 3,194 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 3,207 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 3,207 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (26 December 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
790 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 291 | 36.8% | |
| ❤ | 203 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 171 | 21.6% | |
| 😐 | 43 | 5.44% | |
| 🌚 | 35 | 4.43% | |
| 🐳 | 25 | 3.16% | |
| 😈 | 9 | 1.14% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 1.14% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.253% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.253% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 790reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sheitan_hastam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 December 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🛑پیشگویی بزرگ بلغاری راجب آینده ایران در سال 2026 https://t.me/+Wpa8s5r02jRmMmY0 🛑حتی راجب نتیجه مذاکرات و جنگ ایران و آمریکا رو پیشبینی کرده حتی گفته پیروز جنگ کدام طرف خواهد شد ‼️‼️ https://t.me/+Wpa8s5r02jRmMmY0
🔹یه مامور اطلاعاتی اطلاعات نظامی و سیاسیش بالاست اینجا یاد بگیر(: @FATEHEINN_NEWS...🇮🇷
بیشتر از خدا از کسی که خدا رو قبول کرده حرف بزن اینا چرا فحش نمیدن ؟ اینا چرا اینجورین؟ دینی که اینا رو پرورش داده چیه ؟ خیلی از شماها خدا قبول کرده های کافر زندگی کنید😏 @sheitan_hastam
❤10
شیطان پرست؟! ــاجرای آیین های شیطانی 😈 من شیطانم اما تو رو مجبور به همراهی یا پرستش خود نمیکنم ... من فقط به قسم خودم برای گمراهی تو تلاش میکنم در شگفتم از انسان و کارهایش ـــمراسم خاص قربانی کردن کودکان برای به دست آوردن قدرت☠ @sheitan_hastam
💔15😈4👍2😐2❤1🌚1🐳1
جزیره اپستین جایی که سیاستمداران متجاوزگر مکانی برای لذت جنسی یا اجرای آیین های شیطانی خود فراهم کرده بودند و حالا تمام دنیا شاهد این گند بزرگ تاریخی است @sheitan_hastam
💔15😐4👍3❤2🌚1🐳1😢1
سوال اینه که اگه ترامپ ایران رو بزنه آیا ایران به مردم ایران برمیگرده ؟ گلشیفته فراهانی تا چند وقت قبل به عنوان نماد زیبایی و اصالت دیده میشد و حالا بعد از این مصاحبه به عنوان سرباز نظام و حکومت آخوندی شناخته میشه ... مسئله همه راه نجات ایران و بهتر شدن وضع موجوده اما کی درست میگه ؟! ترامپ و آمریکا راه نجات ایرانه؟ @sheitan_hastam
❤26👍7🌚2🐳2😐2
انقلاب اسلامی ما با روند و مناسبات اقتصادی موجود در جامعه ما در معرض خطر و آسیب قطعیست... برای اینکه در این بُعدش اسلامی نشده است نزدیک به ۱۵ماه (۴۷ سال) است از پیروزی انقلاب میگذرد ولی هنوز در جامعه ما سیر ها و خیلی سیر ها با گرسنه ها و خیلی گرسنه ها با هم در جامعه دیده میشوند تا وقتی چنین است جامعه ما اسلامی نیست... قابل قبول نیست برای ما که اداره جامعه در دست ما باشد و باز هم در این مملکت کسی شب گرسنه بخوابد :…
❤35👍7🐳3👎2💔1
اعتراض یا اغتشاش !!؟ من تو را برای رفتن به خیابان و اعتراض به گرانی ترغیب کردم نه برای به آتش کشیدن آسیب زدن و غارت اموال مردم نه برای زدن آدمهای بیگناه صرفا چون عقاید متفاوتی دارند... من تو را مجبور به کاری نمیکنم ،فقط پیشنهاد میدم و حالا از دور تماشا میکنم جنگ داخلی را جنگ بین هموطن ها ... @sheitan_hastam
👍38❤10🌚3🐳3💔2😐2😈1😢1
. راستش این روز ها طوری منِ شیطان از برخی انسان نما ها هاج و واج مانده ام که اصلا رویم نمیشود بگویم من شیطانم ماشاشیطان خودتان از ما ماهر ترید در کشتن و شایعه و افترا و دزدی شیطان بودن را برایمان راحت تر کرده اید و ما انگشت به دهانیم .
💔55❤12👍6🌚3🐳2😈2😐2😢1
. من شیطانم تو فکر میکنی من ترامپ یا نتانیاهو و.. ام اما من خیلی از اینا به تو نزدیک ترم من همون صدای درونتم که تورو وادار میکنم برای خشم و اعتراضت حق داری ادمی رو بکشی فقط چون داره وظیفه اشو انجام میده من همون صدای درونتم که هر تخریب و آشوبی رو برات توجیه میکنم من همون صدای درونتم که میگم وطن و خاکت و با دست خودت نابود کن ولی یادت نره من فقط یه صدام ن مجبور کننده .
💔86🌚8👍5🐳3🤣2😐2😢2
. من شیطانم اگر هیچ کاری هم نتوانم بکنم که تو را وسوسه کنم قدرت تفکر انتقادی را از تو میگیرم اینگونه تو تبدیل میشوی به برده جامعه ، فضای مجازی و در اصل من :) .
❤89👍18🌚8😐6🐳3
من شیطانم اما بالا رفتن ارز و طلا دست من نیست.🤑 من فقط از دور ایستادم تماشا میکنم که -امید جوانان هر روز برای ادامه این زندگی کمتر میشه . - آمار ازدواج و فرزند آوری هر روز پایین تر میاد -آمار طلاق روز به روز بالاتر میره - مردمی که دیگه قدرت خرید مایحتاج خونه رو ندارن... و آثار این اتفاقات که باعث میشه کار من آسونتر بشه ـــ رواج روابط بدون تعهد سقط جنین طلاق زندان و ... @sheitan_hastam
👍80😐12💔8🌚7❤5🐳4😢4😈2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sheitan_hastam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,102,379 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شیطان هَستم 👿” (@sheitan_hastam), 3,168 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheitan_hastam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.