Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Şeq̇an lar

Channel

Şeq̇an lar

@sheganlar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,003subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002819002726
TypeChannel
Username@sheganlar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sheganlar

Growth

9611,0039827 August 2026 — 961 subscribers8 August 2026 — 961 subscribers8 August 2026 — 966 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,003 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 955–1,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:271,003+37
8 Aug 2026, 05:27966+5
8 Aug 2026, 00:48961no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:54961first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.6%
avg views ÷ 1,003 subscribers
Avg views / post
448
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,476
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 31s
Average length
1m 46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 523370838939718905813148.9%
4316.0%
custom 57961779593163616243914.6%
👍269.70%
custom 5316647102690900390176.34%
custom 5289999725427180386124.48%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC113 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👤Шейх Iабдул Iазийз ат-ТIарифий 📏Стагана деккъа цхьа Iилма тоьуш дац гал ца вала, цуьнца цхьана ийман а хила деза цуьнгахь. Бусалба динах галбевла болу дукхах болу нах - Iилма а доцуш деккъа ийман долуш хуьлу я ийман а доцуш Iилма долуш хуьлу.

custom 52337083893971890583👍21custom 52899997254271803861custom 57961779593163616241

6 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC714 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

7custom 52337083893971890583custom 57961779593163616243👍1

4 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC314 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Наше ремесло (наука) — от колыбели до могилы. Кто хочет оставить наше знание хотя бы на один час, пусть оставит его навсегда». 👤 Мухаммад ибн аль-Хасан аш-Шайбани

5custom 52337083893971890583custom 57961779593163616242👍1

2 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC396 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قَالَ أبو الدَّرْدَاء رضي اللّٰه عنه: «مَنْ رَأَى الْغُدُوَّ وَالرَّوَاحَ إِلَى الْعِلْمِ لَيْسَ بِجِهَادٍ فَقَدْ نَقَصَ عَقْلُهُ وَرَأْيُهُ». [جامع بيان العلم وفضله ١٥٢/١ 📖 ] 👤Абу ад-Дардаа ☝ аьлла: 📏«Ӏилма лаха воьдург гӀазотехь вац моьттучун кхетам эшна бу». Абу ад-Дарда ☝ сказал: «Тот Кто, не считает требование знаний дجихадом,у того недостаток в разуме и здравом суждении».

custom 52337083893971890585custom 528999972542718038641👍1

1 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC471 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال إبراهيم النخعي : إني لأرى الشيء مما يُعاب، فما يمنعني من عَيْبه إلا مخافة أن أُبتلى به. 📚 #صفة_الصفوة 👤Ибрахим ан-Наха’и (رحمه الله) сказал: 🤩«Когда я вижу в человеке недостаток, за который его можно порицать, меня удерживает от порицания лишь страх, что Аллах может испытать меня тем же самым».

8custom 52337083893971890585👍1custom 57961779593163616241

29 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC479 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

وقال ابن القيم -رحمه الله "من أفتى الناس بمجرد المنقول في الكتب على اختلاف عرفهم وعوائدهم وأزمنتهم وأحوالهم وقرائن أحوالهم فقد ضلَّ وأضلَّ" إعلام الوقعين، لابن القيم، (٣/ ٧٨ 📚) 👤Ибн аль-Каййим (да помилует его Аллах) сказал: 📏«Тот, кто выносит людям фетвы, опираясь лишь на то, что передано в книгах, не принимая во внимание различия в их обычаях, традициях, времени, обстоятельствах и сопутствующих признаках их по

👍7custom 523370838939718905861custom 57961779593163616241

28 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC438 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال عمر بن الخطاب: «إياكم والدين، فإنّ أوله هم، وآخره حرب» بهجة المجالس ٤٣ 📚 👤Ӏумар ибн ал-ХаттӀаба ☝ аьлла: 📏 «Декхарх ларлолаш, хӀунда аьлча цуьнан хьалхе – сингаттам бу, цуьнан чаккхе – мостаг1алла ду». Умар ибн аль-Хаттаб رضي الله عنه сказал: «Остерегайтесь долгов, ибо их начало — тревога и забота, а конец — вражда (и конфликты)».

custom 523370838939718905882custom 53166471026909003902custom 52899997254271803861

26 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC439 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال مالك بن دينار رحمه الله «إن القلب المحب لله يحب النَّصَبَ لله» 👤Малик бин Дийнар аьлла: 📏"АллахI везачу дагна АллахIан доьхьа къахьегар а деза". «Поистине, сердце, которое любит Аллаха, любит и трудности, переносимые ради Него».

custom 523370838939718905873👍2custom 53166471026909003902

20 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC596 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

﴿إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِندَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ﴾ «Поистине, самый почитаемый среди вас перед Аллахом — самый богобоязненный из вас». (Сура «Аль-Худжурат», 49:13) Под словом «أَتْقَاكُمْ» (самый богобоязненный) перечислено, чем не определяется достоинство человека перед Аллахом: ليس أجملكم — не самый красивый из вас; ليس أغناكم — не самый богатый из вас; ليس أشهركم — не самый известный (знаменитый) из вас; ليس أقواكم

custom 523370838939718905812custom 531664710269090039031👍1

18 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC516 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

© Шейх Абдурразак аль Бадр «Одна из причин гибели молодых парней и девушек то, что они следят в соц сетях за всякими ничтожными личностями».

👍8custom 523370838939718905842custom 52899997254271803861custom 57961779593163616241

17 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC538 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قَالَ الإِمَامُ الشَّافِعِيُّ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ: "أَفْضَلُ أَعْمَالِ المَرْءِ: كَتمُ الفَقْرِ حَتَّى يظُنَّ النَّاسُ أَنَّهُ غَنِيّ، وَكَظْمُ الغَيْظِ حَتَّى يَظُنَّ النَّاسُ أَنَّهُ رَاضٍ. مناقب الشافعيّ للبيهقي ١٨٨/٢ 📚 👤Имам Шафиlис ☝ аьлла: 📏Къонахчун уггар дика Іамалах ду, цо шен къоьлла хьул яр, нахан и хьалдолуш ву моттал. Иштта цо шен оьгlазло хьулйар а нахан и резa ву моттал. «Лучшие деяния человека —

custom 5233708389397189058102custom 52899997254271803862custom 53166471026909003901

15 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC582 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال ابْنُ الْقَيِّمِ: جَعَلَ اللَّهُ الْعَيْنَ مِرْآةً لِلْقَلْبِ، فَإِذَا غَضَّ الْعَبْدُ بَصَرَهُ؛ غَضَّ الْقَلْبُ شَهْوَتَهُ وَإِرَادَتَهُ، وَإِذَا أَطْلَقَ بَصَرَهُ، أَطْلَقَ الْقَلْبُ شَهْوَتَهُ #روضة_المحبين 📖 👤Ибн аль-Каййим сказал: «Аллах сделал глаза зеркалом сердца. Если человек оберегает свой взор, то и его сердце оберегается от страстей и дурных желаний. Но стоит отпустить взгляд, как сердце начинает

custom 57961779593163616249custom 523370838939718905831👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sheganlar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 217,614 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Şeq̇an lar” (@sheganlar), 1,003 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheganlar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.