Hey, do you need it?
❤843👍191🔥45👎39😭19👏12🆒12🐳9

Channel
@sheeridverifier_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
61,464subscribers
+32,705 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003289603477 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sheeridverifier_channel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sheeridverifier_channel |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:57 | 61,464 | +942 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:57 | 60,522 | +510 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:28 | 60,012 | +420 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:46 | 59,592 | +722 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 58,870 | +558 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 58,312 | +551 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 57,761 | +181 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:21 | 57,580 | +338 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:30 | 57,242 | +116 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 57,126 | +168 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:14 | 56,958 | +277 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 56,681 | +725 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:48 | 55,956 | +811 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 55,145 | +354 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 54,791 | +563 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:54 | 54,228 | +6,234 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:11 | 47,994 | +8,482 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:45 | 39,512 | +451 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 39,061 | +349 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 38,712 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 164 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (22 May 2026 – 29 October 2026) |
| Views total | 50,600 |
| Reactions total | 128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 09:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,462 reactions across 25 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,368 | 68.4% | |
| 👍 | 363 | 10.5% | |
| 👎 | 158 | 4.56% | |
| 🔥 | 85 | 2.46% | |
| 🤣 | 72 | 2.08% | |
| 💩 | 45 | 1.30% | |
| 🖕 | 41 | 1.18% | |
| 😭 | 38 | 1.10% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 1.04% | |
| 🤬 | 32 | 0.924% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 0.751% | |
| 💔 | 19 | 0.549% | |
| 🤮 | 19 | 0.549% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 0.52% | |
| 🐳 | 16 | 0.462% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 0.462% | |
| 😐 | 15 | 0.433% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 0.404% | |
| 🆒 | 12 | 0.347% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 0.318% | |
| 14 further kinds | 58 | 1.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| verifier | 5 | 6 June 2026 | 29 October 2026 |
| Verifier | 2 | 28 October 2026 | 29 October 2026 |
| verification | 1 | 29 May 2026 | 29 May 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 29 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (66.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📢 ANNOUNCEMENT: PIXEL PRO UPGRADE IS BACK! Hello everyone! 👋 Recently, we have received many questions about Pixel upgrades. We are happy to announce that Pixel Pro upgrades are now available again! 🎉 ⚠️ Important Update: The subscription duration is now 6 months instead of the previous 12 months. We still offer 2 upgrade options: 🔹 Full Upgrade: Includes payment processing. 🔹 Offer Link Only: Get the promotiona…
❤40👍4🔥2👏1
📢 HOW TO FIX GOOGLE AI PRO SHOWING PLUS AFTER VERIFICATION Hello everyone! 👋 If you successfully verified Google AI Pro but only see the Plus plan, follow these steps: 1️⃣ Close Payment Profiles: Click here 2️⃣ Leave Google Family Group: Click here ✅ Family Managers can skip this step. 3️⃣ Get your SheerID link: https://one.google.com/ai-student 4️⃣ Verify using our bot: @sheeridverifier_bot — /verify 5️⃣ Watch th…
❤42🤮3👎1
Hello, send link SheerlD to bot to Claim Offer Bot smooth now 60-70% Use /verify command in SheerID Verifier Bot Thanks🥰 Best regards, SheerID Verifier Bot Management Team
👏15🖕10❤7👎2🤡1
Hey, do you need it?
❤843👍191🔥45👎39😭19👏12🆒12🐳9
Hello everyone, the bot will be back soon ❤️. Those who need Gemini Pro verification, please send your SheerID link to the Admin @taomua. He will help you verify it. The cost is $1.2
❤224👎58💩36🤬20🤔7😢7😁5☃4
Hello everyone, do you need😊
❤118👍37😐14🔥7❤🔥5🤬5🙏5
Sorry guys, the bot will be back online in a few days when I get home. I'm currently busy with some personal matters. Anh em thông cảm cho mình nha, hết tuần bot sẽ chạy lại. Pixel hiện tại đã ngưng rồi, mình chuyển qua Student nha anh em.
❤75🤣27🖕20🤮10🤬7👍5👏3🔥3
Hello everyone, the bot will be back soon ❤️. Those who need Gemini Pro verification, please send your SheerID link to the Admin @taomua. He will help you verify it. The cost is $1.2
❤60🤣45🤮6👎1
Mình thấy acc nào trước mà xác thực sinh viên ở Bot mình rồi fake VPN qua mẽo và add visa mẽo là lên gói Pro 1 năm luôn, không cần xác thực gì cả.
❤58🥰12🤔4
Hello everyone, we sincerely apologize for the internet connection issues that occurred over the past two days. We have fixed the problem and the bot is now functioning stably. We sincerely apologize. As an apology, we have released a BOTWORKING gift code for the first 100 people to use. Thank you. Sincerely,
❤86👎20💔12👍8🎃4👏3😢1
Hello everyone, we sincerely apologize for the bot's outage throughout today. The system is currently down due to an internet connection issue. We will fix it as soon as possible, no later 18 hours. We kindly ask for your understanding and patience. Thank you. Sincerely.
❤64😭16👎10👍4🤯1
Hi everyone, would you like me to add an option to just use the extract Gemini Pro 12-month offer link so you can add your own payment card? Would anyone like to restore their SheerlD student authentication for YouTube, Spotify, SoundCloud, etc.? If possible, please leave a ❤️ for the Gemini Pro 12-month offer link and a 🧡 for SheerlD. Thank you everyone. Sincerely.
❤519❤🔥20👍18👎11💔7🤔5😭3😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @sheeridverifier_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@sheeridverifier_channel edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @sheeridverifier_channel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gemini Pro Automation Channel 🎓” (@sheeridverifier_channel), 61,464 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheeridverifier_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.