Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

She Lab | эстетичные события

@she_lab_community

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

632subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003506466829
TypeChannel
Username@she_lab_community
DescriptionЖенское сообщество • мероприятия • Москва Меня зовут Кристина, и я создаю мероприятия, на которые сама хотела бы сходить 🤭 @xttina Отметка в истории/посте и подписью «мероприятие женского клуба SheLab” -10%
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 6 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/she_lab_community

Growth

631632631.57 Aug 2026, 14:41 — 631 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:51 — 632 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:50 — 632 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:418 Aug 2026, 02:50
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 631–632 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:50632no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:51632+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:41631first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.5%
avg views ÷ 632 subscribers
Avg views / post
440
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held14 (6 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,758
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
123
Videos
21
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53191452961884193333421.7%
custom 61857259224909771203019.1%
custom 54652836457889372672113.4%
custom 52559561911414542031912.1%
custom 6211015514563545692148.92%
custom 5406595657878220722117.01%
custom 525613109509465229095.73%
🆒85.10%
custom 540461493922039112374.46%
custom 546528091848470464142.55%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @she_lab_community. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC165 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скульптурный этюд с натурщиком переносится на 6 сентября (вс) по техническим причинам Подробности | билеты по ссылке 📎

Signed Christina

28 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC274 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Обзор на готовые изделия с нашего прошлого мастер-класса по керамике Aesthetic🤌 и Армен 😁 Спасибо Маше за помощь участницам при создании изделий😌за ее внимание и чуткое отношение к каждой 💗

custom 52559561911414542038custom 54652836457889372672

Signed Christina

28 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,080 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скульптурный этюд с натурщиком 6 сентября 13:00 , воскресенье Приглашаем провести красивый летний день в женском кругу. В атмосферной мастерской в историческом центре Москвы под руководством профессионального скульптора мы создадим фигуру обнаженной модели из глины. В программе — творческая практика с натуры под руководством профессионального скульптора , премиальные материалы, игристое и лёгкие закуски. Камерн

custom 54652836457889372673

Signed Christina

28 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC239 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 61857259224909771206custom 53191452961884193332custom 54046149392203911232🆒1

Signed Christina

28 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC477 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Пока одни судорожно собирают handmade коллекцию посуды, другие не забрали свои первые тарелки из мастерской 😁 Девушки, свяжитесь с Машей чтобы забрать ваши изделия @mariiabazanova

custom 61857259224909771205custom 54065956578782207223🆒2custom 52559561911414542032custom 54652836457889372672custom 52561310950946522901

Signed Christina

28 Jun 2026, 10:37 UTC437 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53191452961884193339custom 54652836457889372673custom 54046149392203911232custom 62110155145635456922🆒1

Signed Christina

22 Jun 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,820 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

В это воскресенье мы вновь соберемся в самой уютной мастерской Москвы, чтобы сделать блюдо для самых красивых подач ✨ 🍋28 июня 13:00 (Вс) 📍Исторический центр Москвы, 3 минуты от Пушкинского музея 🍇Частная мастерская художника-керамиста 🍉Снеки/напитки 💸5000₽ Количество мест ограничено Запись @xttina с пометкой «керамика» Готовые работы с прошлых мк смотрите в подборке 💕

custom 54652836457889372675custom 52559561911414542032custom 54046149392203911232custom 62110155145635456922custom 54065956578782207221custom 61857259224909771201

Signed Christina

20 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC450 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 618572592249097712010🆒4custom 53191452961884193334custom 62110155145635456923custom 52559561911414542032custom 54652836457889372672custom 54065956578782207221

Signed Christina

18 Jun 2026, 07:20 UTC465 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже в эту субботу чаёвничаем с домашним пирогом и разбираемся в японской теории цвета, мастерим собственный гармоничный коллаж-портрет и болтаем обо всём под самурайский фильм ❤️ 20 июня в 12:00 Стоимость - 2.000р Запись - @NathanVas

custom 53191452961884193335custom 54065956578782207224custom 52561310950946522902custom 52559561911414542031custom 54652836457889372671

Signed Nat Vass

12 Jun 2026, 18:45 UTC530 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @actionsandreactionsPhoto

👋 Воскресный бранч и мастер-класс с японским классиком 😡 Изучаем «цветовые стандарты» японского художника-постановщика, лауреата премии Оскар и основателя собственной теории цвета Сандзо Вада. Слушаем лекцию, пьём освежающие напитки и кофе, а также мастерим собственный портрет-коллаж согласно гармоничным сочетаниям оттенков. ✏️ 20 июня в 12:00 в Москве 🏠 Кафе и арт-пространство Тинторетто, Малый Казённый переуло

custom 54065956578782207222

Signed Christina

4 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC662 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Где вы живёте?

  1. Москва80%
  2. Санкт-Петербург3%
  3. Город-миллионник9%
  4. Небольшой город4%
  5. Поселок/деревня2%
  6. Другая страна2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Christina Cosmo

4 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC603 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы всё чаще говорим о встречах, девичниках и совместных путешествиях. Стало интересно: а где живут участницы нашего клуба? ✨ Давайте соберём нашу географию и посмотрим, в каких городах нас больше всего. Возможно, именно там пройдёт одна из будущих встреч 💕 Выбираете из опроса ниже или напишите ваш город в комментариях 👇 Жду ваши города в комментариях — возможно, рядом с вами уже есть подруга из нашего клуба 💕

custom 53191452961884193334custom 54652809184847046414

Signed Christina Cosmo

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @she_lab_community. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTCAnonymous Poll152 voters

Где вы живёте?

  1. Москва80%
  2. Санкт-Петербург3%
  3. Город-миллионник9%
  4. Небольшой город4%
  5. Поселок/деревня2%
  6. Другая страна2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 700,373 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“She Lab | эстетичные события” (@she_lab_community), 632 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/she_lab_community.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.