Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Господин Школiр

@shcolyr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

559subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002406853900
TypeChannel
Username@shcolyr
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shcolyr

Growth

5575595587 Aug 2026, 13:15 — 557 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:35 — 557 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:26 — 559 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:158 Aug 2026, 11:26
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 557–559 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:26559+2
8 Aug 2026, 03:35557no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:15557first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 27 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
583.2%
avg views ÷ 559 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,260
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held16 (27 February 202628 July 2026)
Views total6,520
Reactions total242
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,443 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519737631185255798981733.4%
custom 519771556272933613854122.1%
custom 526930777558590702042617.4%
💋38215.6%
custom 519066883995156126725710.5%
💔200.819%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,443reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
83
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 16 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
62
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shcolyr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 February 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC≈3,030 views121 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⁉️⁉️⁉️

custom 519737631185255798964custom 519771556272933613831💋24💔2

23 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC≈3,490 views121 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😅👀

💋65custom 519771556272933613827custom 519737631185255798922custom 52693077755859070205custom 51906688399515612672

25 Jun 2026, 15:56 UTC≈3,560 views134 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩

custom 519737631185255798964custom 526930777558590702032💋24custom 51977155627293361388custom 51906688399515612674💔2

17 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC747 views151 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

плохой друг 🎀🎀🎀 (хороший бойфренд)

custom 526930777558590702075💋32custom 519066883995156126725custom 519771556272933613812custom 51973763118525579896💔1

9 Jun 2026, 15:05 UTC850 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026

хз что за подшар за чб у меня

💋35custom 519066883995156126715custom 52693077755859070203custom 51977155627293361381

9 Jun 2026, 15:05 UTC≈3,120 views129 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

еще они я хотела сделать полноценку, но пока так 👍👍

custom 526930777558590702065custom 519771556272933613829custom 519066883995156126728custom 51973763118525579896💔1

9 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC684 views111 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

вдали от дома 🥹

custom 519737631185255798955custom 519066883995156126729custom 519771556272933613821💔4custom 52693077755859070202

14 May 2026, 13:27 UTC≈4,000 views167 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

всем здравствуйте

custom 519737631185255798988💋40custom 519066883995156126729custom 51977155627293361385custom 52693077755859070205

14 Apr 2026, 16:11 UTC≈4,010 views202 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ну модель

custom 5197376311852557989110custom 526930777558590702045custom 519066883995156126733custom 519771556272933613810💋4

28 Mar 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,390 views181 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

лиза и я 🤩🤩

custom 519771556272933613888custom 519737631185255798949custom 526930777558590702035💔5💋3custom 51906688399515612671

22 Mar 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,450 views155 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

коммишка. на руке должно быть кое-что, но это слишком нишево для канала👀

custom 519737631185255798975custom 526930777558590702041custom 519771556272933613827💋9custom 51906688399515612672💔1

14 Mar 2026, 12:23 UTC≈3,430 views166 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

няшутся 😑😑

custom 519737631185255798987custom 526930777558590702045custom 519771556272933613831💔3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @shcolyr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,236,118 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Господин Школiр” (@shcolyr), 559 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shcolyr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.