Channel
@shbxbcp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
116subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003837787924 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shbxbcp |
| Created | 8 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shbxbcp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 116 | +20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 96 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 96 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (8 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 64 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【所属群组】： 上海补习班👉 @qgsh5 【评价时间】： 2026-08-07 【评价人】： 匿名 【评价老师】： 叶子 【人照评分】： 9.0 【颜值评分】： 9.0 【身材评分】： 9.0 【态度评分】： 9.0 【服务评分】： 9.0 【环境评分】： 9.0 【描述过程】： 交通非常方便，就在地铁站附近。老师颜值高，身材火辣，尤其是胸部又大又挺。服务包含陪洗，可以选丝袜制服，不过我没选，觉得老师全裸的样子更好看。AB面服务都有，全程配合度很高，最后顺利走人。
【所属群组】： 上海补习班👉 @qgsh5 【评价时间】： 2026-07-31 【评价人】： cl eab 【评价老师】： 长宁 月月 【人照评分】： 8.0 【颜值评分】： 8.0 【身材评分】： 9.0 【态度评分】： 8.0 【服务评分】： 8.0 【环境评分】： 7.0 【描述过程】： 中了半价，立马跟老师约了时间，由于下午快六点钟，gzs还在老小区，上楼比较曲折，gzs的隔音不好，蹑手蹑脚的有点，先陪浴，然后b面，b面服务很好，就是中途突然停下看了下手机。做服务的时候还会问下我爽不爽， 这点好评。然后正面三点口，提枪上阵，老师穿上黑丝高跟，开始cjs，由于隔音问题，老师叫的声音不是很大，但是是有反馈。十多分钟后出货。美美洗个澡撤退
【所属群组】： 上海补习班👉 @qgsh5 【评价时间】： 2026-07-27 【评价人】： 小水滴 RR 【评价老师】： 泰国古法专业抓龙筋 【人照评分】： 9.0 【颜值评分】： 9.0 【身材评分】： 9.0 【态度评分】： 10.0 【服务评分】： 10.0 【环境评分】： 9.0 【描述过程】： * 课程名称： 精油开背 + 前列腺保养 + 古法抓龙筋 * 服务老师： Sini老师（ 闵行七宝，支持遥控上楼） * 体验时间： 2026年7月 * 综合标签： #手法为王 #S级技术 #高意愿复刷 #硬核手法流 功底扎实透彻，功底极深，全臂脱敏思路惊艳。 东北女孩特有的清爽气质，精气神足，真人与照片相符。 流程平稳，老师服务专注，无花式套路。 | ## 🔍 体验细节复盘 ### 🪶 B面：力透背脊，温和保养 * 精油开背： 绝非敷衍的推油，力道扎实且渗透力极强，完全不输正规大牌理疗。老师态度极其认真，背部操作过半时已…
【所属群组】： 上海补习班👉 @qgsh5 【评价时间】： 2026-06-30 【评价人】： 匿名 【评价老师】： 甜心 【人照评分】： 8.0 【颜值评分】： 7.5 【身材评分】： 7.0 【态度评分】： 9.0 【服务评分】： 9.0 【环境评分】： 8.5 【描述过程】： 抽中了老师的工兵券，跟老师联系后早上9点多到老师小区，老师给留了门，进去首先看到穿吊带裙的老师，第一印象还可以，然后扫了一下室内环境还蛮干净整洁的，然后我先去洗澡了，洗完后老师帮忙擦拭了身体，到老师床上老师褪去衣服，整体身材有些差强人意，胸部大概b—c，然后老师先挑逗一番包括舌吻什么的，再帮忙口了一会儿，接着就进入主题，老师全程询问按照什么姿势来，很配合，第一发结束后休息时间和老师聊了会天，等恢复后又开始第二轮，先和老师亲吻一番，揉吸了一会奶子后，进入正题，老师配合姿势，最后交出第二发。全程服务态度不错，整体评价8分。
❤1
【所属群组】： 上海补习班👉 @qgsh5 【评价时间】： 2026-06-29 【评价人】： 一（泰罗） 丁 【评价老师】： 貂蝉 【人照评分】： 10.0 【颜值评分】： 10.0 【身材评分】： 8.0 【态度评分】： 8.0 【服务评分】： 7.0 【环境评分】： 7.0 【描述过程】： 教室在比较好的小区独院单间，进院进门整个房间就一个床一个沙发，里面一个卫生间。开门见到貂蝉妹妹那一瞬间满脑子真的是青春靓丽，绝对真嫩妹，一掐一兜水那种，大眼睛双眼皮水灵灵的带着笑，可爱坏了，加上短袖背带裤装扮，让我感觉回到了初恋。洗好到床上先吻了起来，难得的🐍管饱，于是我先操盘从上到下服务了老师一通，全身又白又软，小馒头和小妹妹都非常敏感，接下来又69一番，这69非常色，让我挑杆梆硬，遂带套cjs，又欣赏到精致的五官不禁又亲亲小脸亲亲小嘴，就这样速速结束了战斗
上海补习班车评频道 pinned a photo
📝报告收录模版 【所属群组】： 成都出击队 【评价时间】：某年×某月×某日× 【评价人】： 某×某 【评价老师】：#×××老师 【人照评分】：实际打分 【颜值评分】：实际打分 【身材评分】：实际打分 【态度评分】： 实际打分 【服务评分】：实际打分 【环境评分】： 实际打分 【描述过程】：兄弟们可写出真实课程感受 与出击过程 （提交报告需要提供相关资料，如聊天记录，与老师合作等） ❗️禁止暴露老师具体位置，与老师大尺度照片❗️
报告收录规则： 😊、提交报告需要提供相关资料，如聊天记录，付款记录等， 2️⃣、报告需用本群模版，投稿学生必须有用户名ID以便管理员识别，无ID的账号、隐藏用户名ID的帐号，报告拒收审核不予通过！ 🤩、老师自行投稿拒收，请勿催促报告审核流程； 🌟、并非所有投稿的报告均会收录，如有推手尬吹、抄袭，则不通过审核！多次警告无效的将拉黑对应用户账号停收报告，发现写假报告刷榜的直接封禁； 5️⃣、不收录未通过神教视频验证和上榜的老师报告；对不符合价格范畴的老师报告拒绝收录。 6️⃣、本规则于发布之日起开始执行！
欢迎兄弟们投稿说错你们真实的想法 私信机器人 @shang2bot 或者群内输入老师名字都可以进行写车评
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @shbxbcp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 520,071 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海补习班车评频道” (@shbxbcp), 116 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shbxbcp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.