Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇵🇸💚 STEP | خطوة

Channel

🇵🇸💚 STEP | خطوة

@shazamohmmed3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,777subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002380237834
TypeChannel
Username@shazamohmmed3
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shazamohmmed3

Growth

2,7772,8202,798.57 August 2026 — 2,820 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,820 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,809 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,797 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,777 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,771–2,826 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:032,777-20
14 Aug 2026, 07:342,797-12
10 Aug 2026, 16:412,809-11
7 Aug 2026, 20:022,820no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:052,820first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.89%
avg views ÷ 2,777 subscribers
Avg views / post
164
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 February 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,636
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 30s
Average length
12m 30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3225.0%
❤‍🔥2721.1%
129.38%
🍓118.59%
😍86.25%
👍75.47%
🏆64.69%
53.91%
💯53.91%
🎉43.13%
👏43.13%
🥰32.34%
😁21.56%
🫡21.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC70 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @karammohmmed3

اَلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ 🍃💚 بِالْأَمْسِ صَدَرَتْ نَتَائِجُ الْبَكَالُورْيَا فِي سُورِيَا للذين ظَفِرُوا بِمُرَادِهِم وَحَقَّقُوا المَجْمُوعَ > «إنَّ نِعَمَ اللَّهِ إِذَا تَقَرَّرَتْ عِنْدَ العَبْدِ لَمْ يَزِدْهُ ذَلِكَ إِلا تَوَاضُعًا وَانْكِسَارًا، وَكُلَّمَا زَادَتْهُ النِّعْمَةُ زَادَهُ اللَّهُ شُكْرًا، وَكُلَّمَا زَادَهُ شُكْرًا زَادَهُ اللَّهُ نِعْمَةً.» ابن القيم (مدارج السالكين

❤‍🔥43🍓1

3 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC114 viewsread 7 August 2026

#هااام قمنا بإضافة الموقع #الثاني للنتائج الامتحانية داخل البوت ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/Exam_results_Syria_bot اشترك قبل #الحذف

3 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC137 viewsread 7 August 2026

النتائج الامتحانية #عبر التطبيق ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/Exam_results_Syria_bot اشترك قبل الحذف

3 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC89 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Syria_naFile

تطبيق النتائج الامتحانية 2026

3 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC158 viewsread 7 August 2026

لسا مانك #مشترك؟🤯 لحق #حالك واشترك قبل #صدور النتائج 🤯👇 https://t.me/Exam_results_Syria_bot #اشترك قبل الحذف

3 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC177 viewsread 7 August 2026

#ع#عاااااجل #صدور التطبيق الرسمي #للنتائج الامتحانية #للتحميل داخل البوت 👇 https://t.me/Exam_results_Syria_bot النتائج بعد #قليل حمل التطبيق بسرعة.

31 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC252 viewsread 7 August 2026

‏تابع قناة أسئلة دينية إسلامية 💭 في واتساب: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8moQk7T8bYKEetiz1D

29 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC268 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#عااجل صدور #نتائج امتحانات البكالوريا #البحرية الآن عبر الرابط ⬇️ https://t.me/Exam_results_Syria_bot اشترك قبل #الحذف.

😁1

28 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC282 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

جاهزين حتى كمللكم السلسلة ؟

😍21

16 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC417 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته كيفكم ياجماعة عدنا والعود احمدُ 😁 تخرجت واخيرًا وفضيت حتى أرجع القناة متل ماكانت وافضل ان شاءالله بدي منكم بس تحكولي شو حابين يكون محتوى القناة بالأيام الي جاية بدكم محتوى برمجة ولا محتوى نصائح بشكل عام؟ والسلام 💕

2❤‍🔥1

16 Feb 2026, 19:38 UTC830 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اول سؤال بيخطر ع بال كل حدا اذا بدي ابدأ بالبرمجة هل لازم أحدد التخصص اول شي أم لازم ادرس الاساسيات؟ جواب الدكتور محمد ابو هدهود حسب مافهمت منه طبعًا قال لازم تتعلم الأساسيات اكيد ليش؟ لانو الاساسيات تشمل جميع التخصصات البرمجية ف اذا تعلمت تخصص ودخلت فيه دون تعلم الأساسيات مستقبلاً رح تواجه صعوبة ب انك تتعلم شي جديد عنك وممكن تتركه بسبب سوق العمل .. اما لو كنت متأسس صح ✅ مارح تلاقي أي صعوبة ب انك تدخل لأي مجال

🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shazamohmmed3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇵🇸💚 STEP | خطوة” (@shazamohmmed3), 2,777 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shazamohmmed3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.