Channel
@shaykhjj_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,968subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001486563244 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shaykhjj_channel |
| Created | 16 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shaykhjj_channel |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 1,968 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 1,966 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 1,964 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 1,966 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 1,967 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 1,963 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 1,964 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 1,968 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 1,969 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 1,971 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 1,971 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
574 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 487 | 84.8% | |
| 👍 | 72 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 1.22% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.871% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.348% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.174% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
On this day Allah revealed that the deen of Islam is complete which indicates that the Prophet ﷺ has conveyed the deen of Islam in totality. The Prophet ﷺ did not hide nor conceal any element of Islam from his companions and he conveyed the Sunnah in totality as obligated. Allah states in Surah Al’Mā’idah which was revealed on the day of ‘Arafah: ٱلۡیَوۡمَ أَكۡمَلۡتُ لَكُمۡ دِینَكُمۡ وَأَتۡمَمۡتُ عَلَیۡكُمۡ نِعۡم…
❤32
Maliki Fiqh Related to Hajj: Concerning the ruling for men wearing a fanny pack during the state of ihrām according to the Maliki School: Khalil states in his Mukhtasar that it is permissible for person to wear a belt during the pilgrim state of ihrām in order to keep his money as long as the belt is directly strapped to his skin, and not over top of his ihrām clothing. Furthermore, it is permissible to also carry…
❤8
Imam Al-Dhahabi states in his Siyar A’lām Al-Nubalā: إذا وقعت الفتن، فتمسّكْ بالسُّنة، وألزمْ الصمت، ولا تخضْ فيما لا يعنيك، وما أشكل عليك فرُدَّه إلى الله ورسوله وقفْ، وقلْ: اللّٰه أعلم . “When fitnah occurs, stick strictly to [what is established] in the Sunnah, keep silent, and don’t indulge in matters that don’t concern you. Whatever is difficult for you to understand, then consign its true knowledge to Alla…
❤35👍4
In this age it is imperative to seek refuge from the evil intentions of man and jinn through the spiritual protection of the numerous duas of seeking refuge with Allah (ta’awwuthāt). This is the true shield of the believer who has yaqīn in Iman. Seeking refuge from evil was the consistent practice of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ . Those who don’t have yaqīn in seeking spiritual refuge will always be driven by haste a…
❤33👍4👏1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤50👍2
Answer to a question I received here: Assalāmu ʿAlaykum shaykh! Pray you’re well. I have this journal where I’ve been compiling nashīha from scholars around the world and I’m wondering if you’d be able to share your top advice for students wanting to continue studying ilm or just the best advice you have for talib ul ilm. For context I’m in my fifth year of my ʿĀlimiyyah studies. BārakAllāhu Fīk! Appreciate it so…
❤16
Posted without readable text
❤2
Channel photo updated
Back in Istanbul. Some places you don’t realize you miss until you come back.
❤37
Unfortunately in a world of evil and propaganda human causalities means nothing for evil propagandists who thrive on deception and evil to spread corruption on the earth. Just read the story behind Surah Al-Baqarah 72 when Allah says: وَإِذۡ قَتَلۡتُمۡ نَفۡسࣰا فَٱدَّ ٰرَ ٰٔۡ تُمۡ فِیهَاۖ وَٱللَّهُ مُخۡرِجࣱ مَّا كُنتُمۡ تَكۡتُمُونَ﴿ ٧٢ ﴾ “And [remember] when you killed a person and quarreled [regarding who did i…
👍17❤4👎1
The signs of the great legacy of Islam are not in the remains of historical structures and the decorated architectures like the grand mosques of Andalusia, Cordoba, and the Ottoman Empire etc. The truth signs of the legacy of Islam are in the preserved books and encyclopedias of knowledge, the life and dedication of the scrupulous scholars in their transmission of knowledge and traveling through land and sea to seek…
❤27👍3👎1
Here is a snippet on a piece I am translating related to celebrating non-Muslim holidays. This issue is far from new in the history of scholarhip, and classical scholars in every school have written in detail about it. Here is the snippet: Ibn Al-Hājj Al-Fāsi Al-Māliki [737 A.H/ Cairo] mentioned the following in his book Al-Madkhal under the chapter heading “Concerning Festive Holidays of The Jews and Christians”:…
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shaykhjj_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shaykh JJ” (@shaykhjj_channel), 1,968 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaykhjj_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.