Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Shardify App

@shardifyapp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

36subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002026709760
TypeChannel
Username@shardifyapp
DescriptionNot an official channel! Fan news Official channel – @shardify Official site – shardify.app
Created1 April 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shardifyapp

Growth

367 August 2026 — 36 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:4636no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2836first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

13 May 2024, 08:27 UTC219 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

For those who trade wNOT or have Vouchers Shardify.app team confirmed they will provide a contract to direct exchange of wNOT to NOT on the listing date.

18 Apr 2024, 09:05 UTC409 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

What will you do with Notcoin after listing?

  1. Selling54%
  2. I'll buy20%
  3. I'll save the Notcoin46%
  4. I don't know14%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Apr 2024, 15:13 UTC556 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Best cryptocurrency on the list?

  1. TON45%
  2. GRAM3%
  3. Notcoin43%
  4. wNOT8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Apr 2024, 10:36 UTC492 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

What do you think about wNOT?

  1. Scam24%
  2. Dog shit15%
  3. Hope for the future32%
  4. Only everything is good29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @shardifyapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Apr 2024, 09:05 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

What will you do with Notcoin after listing?

  1. Selling54%
  2. I'll buy20%
  3. I'll save the Notcoin46%
  4. I don't know14%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Apr 2024, 15:13 UTCAnonymous Poll119 voters

Best cryptocurrency on the list?

  1. TON45%
  2. GRAM3%
  3. Notcoin43%
  4. wNOT8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Apr 2024, 10:36 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

What do you think about wNOT?

  1. Scam24%
  2. Dog shit15%
  3. Hope for the future32%
  4. Only everything is good29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2024 to 13 May 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shardify App” (@shardifyapp), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shardifyapp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.