Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

شَغَفْ❤️

@shaqaf00

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,560subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668710317
TypeChannel
Username@shaqaf00
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shaqaf00

Growth

4,5604,5624,56115 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 4,562 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 16:51 — 4,560 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 04:0115 Aug 2026, 16:51
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,560–4,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:514,560-2
15 Aug 2026, 04:014,562first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.79%
avg views ÷ 4,560 subscribers
Avg views / post
446
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 May 202611 August 2026)
Views total4,462
Reactions total90
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

199 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10954.8%
😁4623.1%
👏2814.1%
💯105.03%
😢52.51%
👎10.503%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC119 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

I looked for the answer but couldn't find it. when I did, the question was different.

5

Signed S. J. M

5 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC284 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

أخطر شيء ممكن أن تفعله بالمال هو أن تستخدمه لإثبات قيمتك. منذ طفولتنا نتعلم أن المال يشتري الأشياء، لكن القليلين من يدركون أن المال يشتري المكانة أيضًا. لهذا السبب بعض الناس لا يشترون ساعة بـ 20 ألف دولار، ليس لأنها تعطي الوقت بل لأنها تعطي رسالة. السؤال الحقيقي ليس "كم ثمن الساعة؟" بل "ما الشعور الذي أريد شراءه من خلالها؟" إعجاب، انتماء، احترام، أمان ؟

10👏1

Signed S. J. M

3 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC343 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026

الحمقى يريدون النيل مني ولكن النيل في مصر وليس عندي 😁

😁7👏1

Signed S. J. M

3 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC331 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ستنتهي الحرب ويتصافح القادة، وستبقى تلك العجوز تنتظر ولدها الشهيد! والأطفال ينتظرون والدهم البطل. لا أعلم من باع الوطن، لكن أعلم من دفع الثمن.

😢5

Signed S. J. M

28 Jul 2026, 05:57 UTC454 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026

السعي وراء اليقين المطلق يُعطّل البحث عن المعنى، لأن عدم اليقين هو الشرط الأساسي الذي يدفع الإنسان لاكتشاف قواه الذاتية.

8

Signed S. J. M

28 Jul 2026, 05:55 UTC421 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026

المشاعر التي لا نعبر عنها لا تموت أبدًا، بل تُدفن حية لتظهر لاحقًا بطرق أكثر قبحًا.

7

Signed S. J. M

25 Jul 2026, 00:55 UTC519 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026

شايف مِن تجي تدعي .. وتگول ياربِّ أنطيني علىٰ گد رحمتك والله تعالىٰ يقول : ( وَرَحمتِي وَسِعت كُلَّ شَيء ) تخيل لو يستجاب دُعائك وينطيك علىٰ گدها✨.

6

Signed Shawqe

23 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC595 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ليس الطريق لمن سَبَق، إنَّما الطريق لمن صَدَق.

9

Signed Shawqe

21 Jul 2026, 20:38 UTC636 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026

كُن لينًا مع نفسك.. فأنت الوحيد الذي يعرف كم صمدت.✨

11👏5

Signed Shawqe

16 Jul 2026, 23:22 UTC760 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026

لقد أصابها الصمت بَعدما كانت أحاديثها لاتنتهي

14👏1

20 Jun 2026, 21:27 UTC≈1,080 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

عندما تموت لن تشعر انك ميت، الذين حولك هم من يشعرون نفس الشي عندما تكون حمار …

😁10

13 Jun 2026, 07:35 UTC≈1,250 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026

يحاول الراعي دائمًا إقناع الخراف بأن مصالحهم ومصالحه شيء واحد.

9😁4

Signed S. J. M

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shaqaf00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𖤍 Al Jokeer - الجوكر 𖤍
@aljoker_z_e · 181,981
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 15 August 2026
نجوم ✨
@starsZE · 128,426
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
صديقي 𖤍
@friend0i0 · 101,041
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شَغَفْ❤️” (@shaqaf00), 4,560 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaqaf00.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.