大哥们 结账,报账单 自觉一点,别一直让催
👍1👏1

Channel
@shanhai11223344
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,655subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002115401721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shanhai11223344 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shanhai11223344 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 1,655 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 1,650 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 1,650 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,562 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
大哥们 结账,报账单 自觉一点,别一直让催
👍1👏1
怀盈频道通知 pinned «天马全渠道收,挪过来我给你+1 有产值单价还可以在谈 @hy01i»
天马全渠道收,挪过来我给你+1 有产值单价还可以在谈 @hy01i
8月上旬已经过去了。每天都在对接色粉全渠道稳定结算,只要不掺不假,质量可以一起调整。欢迎来报,有质量价格可议 😀😃😀😃😀😃😀😀😀 @hy01i
排单报码 报明天码子 渠道姿势 怎么转怎么扫 报清楚。超过8点不加
❤1
😀😃😀😃😀😃 不限渠道 通吃一切色粉 天马、CPA、Q群 通通吃!!! 真粉包结 真粉包结 真粉包结 怀盈团队24小时客服在线 24小时随时开卡 你的打粉速度永远赶不上我打款的速度!!! 打粉认准怀盈:@hy01i
@XH5099 ID:7880470623 与此人合作谨慎 拉稀仔
❤2
打粉的速度了 每天超过 1000 粉还是奖励 usdt!!!
👍2
😀😀😃 😃😀 😃😀😃😀 ❤️全系列 上天马 浏览器 q群❤️ 😘😘😘 ❤️抖音全系列 ❤️快手全系列 ❤️b站全系列 ❤️小红书全系列 ❤️陌陌全系列 ❤️探探全系列 ❤️灵魂全系列 ❤️积木全系列 ❤️TT语音 百度爬虫 QQ站街❤️ 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 ❤️游戏全系列❤️ ❤️王者荣耀 ❤️英雄联盟 ❤️金铲铲 ❤️QQ飞车 ❤️无畏契约 ❤️永劫无间 ❤️和平精英 ❤️穿越火线 😀包养一手工作室卡密丝滑 单价高 高速交流 直接发姿势 多少量 打粉视频 怀盈唯一ID:@hy01i
❤1
工作室来 ✅ 大量收Q群 天马 真粉来聊价格 来聊包养✅ 量大工作室来 只要真粉 ✅ 只要真粉 和量 ✅ 能打的来谈谈✅ 怀盈团队依旧稳定✅ @hy01i
报量!报量!报量!
😀😀😀 抖音 陌陌 探探 视频号 色播 微博 灵魂 皮皮虾 QQ 推特 咸鱼 小红书 贴吧 b站 各种端游 手游 😀😀😀 大量收一切质量粉,速速来报! 抖音截流,自热,粉丝群,直播甩码,灵魂,探探,b站自热 ,V圈,V站街 闲鱼,快手系列,QQ系列,小平台,皮皮虾热评,上天马,上Q群,浏览器,高价收跳槽价格➕1 大量要抖音同城v扫。快手同成v扫,价格置顶。 全方位的能打来谈谈价格+1 出粉认准 @hy01i 所有平台都要大量收
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shanhai11223344. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,132,907 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“怀盈频道通知” (@shanhai11223344), 1,655 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shanhai11223344.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.