Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +210. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,863–5,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 19:18
5,107
-19
14 Sept 2026, 16:41
5,126
+54
10 Sept 2026, 18:57
5,072
+51
5 Sept 2026, 19:00
5,021
+3
1 Sept 2026, 16:44
5,018
+8
29 Aug 2026, 13:14
5,010
+16
26 Aug 2026, 16:56
4,994
+57
24 Aug 2026, 00:47
4,937
+12
20 Aug 2026, 14:37
4,925
+12
17 Aug 2026, 17:04
4,913
+7
14 Aug 2026, 14:46
4,906
+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:03
4,905
+3
8 Aug 2026, 06:24
4,902
+5
7 Aug 2026, 10:15
4,897
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:09
4,897
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
56 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5474446335744680905
16
28.6%
❤
16
28.6%
🔥
10
17.9%
👍
3
5.36%
🤯
3
5.36%
🤩
2
3.57%
custom 5242530101899331423
1
1.79%
custom 5258115571848846212
1
1.79%
⚡
1
1.79%
👌
1
1.79%
👏
1
1.79%
💯
1
1.79%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📺 Почему всё больше фаундеров, IT-специалистов и семей уезжают из Израиля в США прямо сейчас?
Экономическая нестабильность и давление на высокий технологический сектор больше не оставляют времени на ожидание. В текущих реалиях легальный переезд в США становится самым понятным способом защитить карьеру, бизнес и будущее семьи.
В новом выпуске на YouTube подробно разбираем актуальные программы релокации и объясняем, …
📺 Каких инженеров ОБОЖАЮТ в США? Топ специальностей для EB-1A и EB-2 NIW
Офицеры иммиграционной службы все тщательнее изучают профили заявителей, поэтому ключевым фактором успеха становится правильная презентация ваших реальных заслуг.
📌 В новом видео на YouTube разобрали:
➖3 главные сферы, в которых США сейчас остро нуждаются в квалифицированных инженерах
➖Как грамотно доказать национальную ценность вашей работы…
⚡️ Администрация Трампа рассматривает введение финансового залога до $100 000 для иммиграционных виз в США.
Как думаете, дойдет ли это правило до практики?
Да, введут в ближайшее время18%
Застрянет в судах и юридических спорах54%
Примут, но только для «зоны риска»19%
Ничего не изменится17%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⚡️Backyard: Вся правда о продлении визы O-1 в 2026 году
Многие путают визовый штамп в паспорте и легальный статус в США – и из-за этого теряют право на работу или боятся выехать из страны. На самом деле продление O-1 – это четкий и предсказуемый процесс.
☕️ Это будет наш первый дневной «Backyard» – наливайте любимый кофе, берите обед и в расслабленной атмосфере слушайте, как мы разбираем важные юридические тонкости…
Визы для бьюти-мастеров и предпринимателей: как иммигрировать в США в 2026 году
Пока рынок все еще обсуждает меморандум USCIS – виза талантов O-1 продолжает работать в прежнем режиме. Без ограничений по гражданству. Без требования миллионов на счету. На основе профессионализма.
Что разберем на прямом эфире:
⚡️Бьюти-индустрия в США в 2026: рынок, спрос, перспективы
⚡️Виза талантов O-1: критерии, процесс, сроки
⚡️Ви…
Виза талантов O-1 для инженеров: какие профили реально проходят USCIS
Среди инженеров до сих пор распространено убеждение, что O-1 оформляют только для IT и AI-специалистов. На практике в 2025–2026 годах одобрения активно идут по инженерным профилям из самых разных направлений.
Кто из инженеров получает O-1
➖R&D-инженеры в автомобильной, авиационной и космической отрасли.
➖Инженеры по робототехнике и автоматизации…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @shamayev_business_law. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⚡️ Администрация Трампа рассматривает введение финансового залога до $100 000 для иммиграционных виз в США.
Как думаете, дойдет ли это правило до практики?
Да, введут в ближайшее время18%
Застрянет в судах и юридических спорах54%
Примут, но только для «зоны риска»19%
Ничего не изменится17%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
A&K: Виза в США 🇺🇸 @ak_usa_visa · 32,319 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
Визовый центр Без границ @vizoviy_bezgranic · 51,636 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
Анатолий Власов 🇺🇸 @vlasovanatoly · 29,923 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иммиграция в США | Shamayev Business Law” (@shamayev_business_law), 5,107 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shamayev_business_law.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.