Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zafaron | шафран | заъфарон | saffron

Supergroup

Zafaron | шафран | заъфарон | saffron

@shafran_uzb

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,090members

+75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

91 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001442313344
TypeSupergroup
Username@shafran_uzb
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 October 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/shafran_uzb

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0051,0921,048.56 August 2026 — 1,015 members9 August 2026 — 1,014 members12 August 2026 — 1,010 members15 August 2026 — 1,014 members18 August 2026 — 1,015 members22 August 2026 — 1,009 members25 August 2026 — 1,026 members28 August 2026 — 1,008 members31 August 2026 — 1,007 members3 September 2026 — 1,010 members9 September 2026 — 1,005 members12 September 2026 — 1,029 members16 September 2026 — 1,019 members1 October 2026 — 1,092 members7 October 2026 — 1,092 members8 October 2026 — 1,090 members1,0906 August 20268 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 63 days, net +75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 992–1,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
8 Oct 2026, 02:011,090-2
7 Oct 2026, 03:381,092no change
1 Oct 2026, 02:211,092+73
16 Sept 2026, 05:581,019-10
12 Sept 2026, 19:551,029+24
9 Sept 2026, 03:561,005-5
3 Sept 2026, 15:411,010+3
31 Aug 2026, 00:121,007-1
28 Aug 2026, 08:071,008-18
25 Aug 2026, 02:571,026+17
22 Aug 2026, 04:071,009-6
18 Aug 2026, 22:261,015+1
15 Aug 2026, 18:041,014+4
12 Aug 2026, 04:471,010-4
9 Aug 2026, 15:111,014-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:331,015first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zafaron | шафран | заъфарон | saffron” (@shafran_uzb), 1,090 members as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shafran_uzb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.