مزرعه ، یاد تو، دلتنگی، اجاق سنگیام، چای را دم کرده ام گرچه چیزی کم نخواهد کرد از دلتنگیام.. #نادر_عبدالوند @shabhaye_niloofari

Channel
شعـر ڪــوتاه
@shabhaye_niloofari
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,030subscribers
+154 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001003126522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shabhaye_niloofari |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shabhaye_niloofari |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 18,030 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 18,041 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 18,044 | +33 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 18,011 | +8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 18,003 | +10 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 17,993 | +32 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 17,961 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 17,967 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 17,959 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:46 | 17,960 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 17,978 | +20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 17,958 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 17,960 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 17,955 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 17,968 | +21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 17,947 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 17,944 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 17,939 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 17,938 | -22 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 17,960 | first reading |
Engagement
126 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.63%
- avg views ÷ 18,030 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 114
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.04%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 126 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 126 (19 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,427 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 22s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
226 reactions across 53 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 181 | 80.1% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 8.41% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 6.19% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.10% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.33% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.442% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.442% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
شست باران همهی کوچــــه، خیــابـــان ها را پس چرا مانده غمت بر دلِ بارانی من؟! #حسین_منزوی @shabhaye_niloofari
🔺محفل بیداری کندالینی 🔺 🟣 آموزش مراقبــه 🟣 ڪندالینــی یــوگــا 🟣 گــروه تبــادل نظــر 👁 باز کردن چشم سوم 👁 https://t.me/kundalini_awakening https://t.me/kundalini_awakening https://t.me/kundalini_awakening ☝️☝️☝️☝️ 🔺اطلاعات جامع تمام چاکراها🔺
❤1👍1
🟨 اسرار شمع ! ارتباط با روح برتر https://t.me/Sham_Energi77 https://t.me/Sham_Energi77 ☝️☝️☝️ 🟠 کشف رازهای دنیای انرژی 🟠 جایی برای آرامش و نور 🔶🔸🔸
. . ≣ پاکسازی رحم و قطع تار اتری ✦ 📎 کلیک کنید 📎 .
══ 💙 ══ ❥ 🔵 سڪــوت ذهن • آرامــش درون ◉ SiLence•of•mind2 ⚘️⚘️
من با تو چقدر ساده رفتم بر باد! تو نام مرا چه زود بــــردی از یاد! من حبهی قند کوچکی بودم که از دست تو در پیالـــهی چای افتاد... #جلیل_صفربیگی @shabhaye_niloofari
❤5
گفته بودی هر وقت که شعر می نویسی دوستم بدار نمی دانم از این همه شعر نوشتن است که دیوانهوار دوستت دارم یا از این همه دوست داشتن که دیوانهوار شعر مینویسم... #واهه_آرمن @shabhaye_niloofari
👏2
❚▷ ♦️خداحافظی با آدمها و افکار منفی! کانالی برای رسیدن به خود واقعی https://t.me/+SUi5RKtkQeVkOWE8 https://t.me/+SUi5RKtkQeVkOWE8 https://t.me/+SUi5RKtkQeVkOWE8 عالیه ازدست ندین☝️👌
══ ⭕️ ══ ❥ 🔴 قدرت های درونــی را بشناسیم ! ◉ PakSazii• Daroun 🔺🔺
📗📕 🔻اگر عادت به خواندن کتاب ندارید. اگر دوست دارید با گذر زمان فرایند کتابخوانی در زندگی شما از یک ارزش تبدیل به یک قاعده شود👌👌 🔻کافی ست عضو بشید👇👇 https://t.me/B00kLifeMe https://t.me/B00kLifeMe 👀بــهتــریــن های ڪــتــاب را ایــنــجــا مــیــبینید 📚
. . ≣ کارما چیست؟ چگونه کارمای اجدادی را پاکسازی کنیم؟ ✦ 📎 کلیک کنید 📎 .
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @shabhaye_niloofari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@shokoh_servat · 7,5936 postsبیداری کندالینی
@kundalini_awakening · 4,5255 postsفـانـوس🦋
@Fanoos7277 · 1,5194 postsGognus_kimiagar ققنوس کیمیاگر کانال( خودشناسی و معماری درون)
@gognus_kimiagar · 9,4464 postsمراقبه آگاهی
@man_m_hastam · 20,5824 postsڪتابخانه مجازی...شیفتگان کتاب️📚
@B00kLifeMe · 18,6463 postsنور درون
@noordarooni · 1,7383 postsReiki Knowledge
@Reiki_knowledge · 7,3553 posts🕯 خانه ی شمع و انرژی 😍🕯
@Sham_Energi77 · 1,7713 postsسابلیمینال حال خوب
@subliminalhalekhoob · 4,8453 posts🔺افسانه اعداد🔺
@Afsane_adad · 5,0722 postsمیلاد نومرولوژی
@Miladnumerology · 9392 postsشاه ِ مردان علی (ع)
@Ali121Ali121Ali · 5,1391 postڪنـج دنج « آرامــش »
@ArameSh_konj07 · 1,6211 post⇠ شـعــــر و شـعــــور ⇠
@Ashar_e_Parsii · 2,1991 postچـــاڪــرا درمـــانـــی
@Chakra_Therapy1 · 8,5851 postدنیای درون _ شناخت خودِ برتر
@dunyaye_daroon · 9,4371 postورزش 🤽یـوگــا 🧘 مــودرا 👌
@Exercise_yoga_mudra · 3,5731 post(( حــضــرت حــافــظ / غــزل ها ))
@Hafez_ChaneL · 4,1341 post✐📘✎📕✐ تیـڪـّه ڪتاب ✐📗✎📙✐
@keTab_e_barTarr · 5,4281 postخداوندان ِ اَسرار
@KhodaVandane_Asrar · 5,8771 post🍁مدیتیشن و چاکرا🍁
@medirtatio1 · 12,8001 post💎 الما๛ هاے آگاهے / اوشو 💎
@Osho_AgahiChaneL · 4,6641 post💕🌸کانال اسرار جهان هستی🌸💕
@qaz123xcvbnmmlp · 4,2251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MossbatAndishann · 22,110
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
@sokhen_nab · 76,613
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@kettabism · 33,814
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
@Fekrezibii · 54,777
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
@GhaffeEshgh · 22,573
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
@textimix · 45,317
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شعـر ڪــوتاه” (@shabhaye_niloofari), 18,030 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shabhaye_niloofari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.