Our channel network on Telegram:- https://t.me/We_ARCH https://t.me/Textures_Album https://t.me/architects_tech https://t.me/We_ARCH2 https://t.me/Arch_Program https://t.me/Block_2D_3D https://t.me/shabakaty_programe https://t.me/REvit_LIbrary https://t.me/S…

Channel
Archiviz Hub
@shabakaty_programe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,557subscribers
+72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001333466651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shabakaty_programe |
| Created | 22 March 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shabakaty_programe |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 8,557 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 8,552 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 8,549 | +9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 8,540 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 8,532 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 8,526 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 8,524 | +12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 8,512 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 8,505 | +12 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 8,493 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 8,489 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 8,487 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 8,485 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 8,485 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 22 March 2020 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 48.1% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 22.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 18.5% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2020 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚀 وفر اشتراك "تليجرام بريميوم" وابحث مجاناً! 🚀 ما كان يحتاج لاشتراك مدفوع أصبح الآن بين يديك! اعثر فوراً على كل المنشورات، القنوات، المجموعات، البوتات ، الروابط، ورسائل الدردشة مع أقوى محرك بحث شامل في تيليجرام. ✨ ما يميزنا: 💸 مجاني 100%: ميزات البحث الشامل لك بلا مقابل. 🚫 بدون إزعاج: لا يوجد "اشتراك إجباري" بقنوات داخله 🇸🇦عربي بالكامل: واجهة سهلة وبحث دقيق يدعم اللغة العربية 100%. 🎯 فلاتر ذكية: خصص نتائج بحثك ل…
❤13🔥6❤🔥5😱3
Archiviz Hub pinned «Our channel network on Telegram:- https://t.me/We_ARCH https://t.me/Textures_Album https://t.me/architects_tech …»
📢 إعلان رسمي للنشر الإعلاني يسرّ Archiviz Hub أن يتيح للمهندسين والمعماريين والمصممين والباحثين والشركات والمكاتب الهندسية وأصحاب المشاريع والمهتمين فرصة نشر إعلاناتهم والوصول إلى جمهور متخصص وواسع من المهتمين بالهندسة والعمارة والتقنيات الحديثة. للاستفادة من خدمة النشر: 🔹 الخطوة الأولى: الانضمام إلى القناة الرسمية: https://t.me/shabakaty_programe 🔹 الخطوة الثانية: إرسال كافة تفاصيل الإعلان عبر بوت التواصل، متضمنة: •…
Channel name was changed to «Archiviz Hub»
لنشر اعلاناتكم تواصلو معنا على بوت تلغرام التالي :https://t.me/Media_we_Archbot
Our channel network on Telegram:- https://t.me/We_ARCH https://t.me/Textures_Album https://t.me/architects_tech https://t.me/We_ARCH2 https://t.me/Arch_Program https://t.me/Block_2D_3D https://t.me/shabakaty_programe https://t.me/REvit_LIbrary https://t.me/S…
لنشر اعلاناتكم تواصلو معنا على بوت تلغرام التالي :https://t.me/Media_we_Archbot
Signed Mohamed Shaheed
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @shabakaty_programe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Arch_Program · 39,2442 postsArch-Tech
@architects_tech · 20,7772 postsArchiviz Resources Hub
@Block_2D_3D · 18,6202 postsLibrary Revit
@REvit_LIbrary · 27,1032 postsSketchup Library
@Sketchup_Library · 20,9112 postsArchiviz Materials Hub
@Textures_Album · 40,9772 postsWe Are Architect
@WAArchitects · 9,2152 postsArchiviz Hub
@We_ARCH · 84,1602 postsرسائل واطاريح معمارية
@We_ARCH2 · 16,4642 postsMySearch Bot🅥
@mysearch · 1,023,0771 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@learningbrightside · 23,778
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Archiviz Hub” (@shabakaty_programe), 8,557 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shabakaty_programe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.