Channel
@shaadizendgi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
918subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001160267766 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shaadizendgi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shaadizendgi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 918 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 916 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 917 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 917 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,038 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
54 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 29 | 53.7% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 13.0% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 9.26% | |
| 😨 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shaadizendgi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌱 تلنگر کاش تونظام آموزش و پرورش بجای تفکیک پنجم از ششم یا دهم از یازدهم و به جای این همه جبر و هندسه و خیلی چیزای دیگه یه دوره آموزشی دوست داشتن هم بود.. بهمون یاد میدادن که چجوری اینکارو بکنیم میگفتن دوست داشتن بهترین حس انسانی هست که در هرفردی منحصر به خودشه باید به ما یاد میدادن وقتی این حس پاک رو میخوایم منتقل کنیم جوری نشه که منجر به ضربه زدن به خودمون و طرف مقابل بشه. دوست داشتن زیاد عشق بوجود میاره و عشق …
👌2
داروخانه آنلاین 🤍💊 @chnl برای لاغری چی بخورم؟🥺🪄 @chnl درمان کننده فوری درد پریودی 🩸:
🌱 همیشه فکر کن هر روز از نو متولد شدهای غم ِ دیروز را و فکرِ فردا را از سرت بیرون کن آدمیزاد اگر سنجاق ِغم دیروز و فکر فردا شود پرواز از یادش میرود آسمان از یادش میرود...! #روزتون_پر_از_حال_خوب 🌱@shaadizendgi🌱
👏1
#پارت۳۳ #سال_سکوت تا به جای مورد نظر برسیم تنها صدای خواننده بود که سکوت ماشین را شکسته بود. آهنگ شاد در حال پخش تفاوت زیادی با حال و احوال سرنشینانش داشت. از چند بلوار و خیابان گذشتیم. میلاد ماشین را کناری نگه داشت گفت: «پیاده شین من ببینم جا پارک پیدا میکنم» در حال پیاده شدن نگاهم به در بزرگ روبرو افتاد. تابلو بزرگ سر درش که از اینجا با وجود شاخ و برگ چنار تنها « آزمایشگاه مرکزی » اش قابل دیدن بود. نسترن کوتاه…
👍3
🌱 تلنگر در درون خود چه دارید؟ سالها پیش کشور آلمان به دو بخش تقسیم شده بود، آلمان شرقی و آلمان غربی و دیواری شهر برلین را به دو قسمت برلین شرقی و برلین غربی تقسیم کرده بود. یک روز، افرادی از برلین شرقی کامیونی پر از زباله و خوراکیهای گندیده متعفن را به سمت غربی دیوار یعنی برلین غربی ریختند. مردم برلین غربی به سادگی می توانستند تلافی و انتقام جویی کنند، ولی این کار را انجام ندادند! ولی به جای آن کامیونی پر از ک…
👏3👍1
🌱 دنیا را همیشه از دریچهای نو بنگر خوب بیاندیش روزت را بساز که خالقِ لحظاتِ زیبای زندگی خودت هستی #روزتون_پر_از_عشق_و_امید 🌱@shaadizendgi🌱
👍1🥰1
🌱 حکایت زیبایی انسان ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﯼ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﺳﯿﺪ: ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻪ ﭼﯿﺰ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺯﯾﺒﺎ میکند؟ ﯾﮑﯽ ﮔﻔﺖ: ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﺩﺭﺷﺖ ﺩﻭﻣﯽ ﮔﻔﺖ: ﻗﺪﯼ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺩﯾﮕﺮﯼ ﮔﻔﺖ: ﭘﻮﺳﺘﯽ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻭ ﺳﻔﯿﺪ! ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﻭ ﻟﯿﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﮐﯿﻔﺶ ﺑﯿﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﯾﮑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﻟﯿﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﯿﺎﺭ گرانبها ﻭ ﺯﯾﺒﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﯾﮕﺮﯼ ﺳﻔﺎﻟﯽ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﯾﮏ ﺍﺯ ﻟﯿﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﭼﯿﺰﯼ ﺭﯾﺨﺖ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﮐﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ: ﺩﺭ ﻟﯿﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﻭ ﺯﯾﺒﺎ ﺯﻫﺮ ﺭﯾﺨﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻟﯿﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻔﺎﻟﯽ ﺁﺑﯽ ﮔﻮﺍﺭﺍ! ﺷﻤﺎ ﮐﺪﺍﻣﯿﮏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ میک…
👌1👍1
🌱 در هر سن که هستی روزهایی بینظیر را تجربه میکنی! چـرا که مانندِ روزهای دیگر فقط یکبار تکرار میشود "هر روز" از عمرت روزهای خوش دارد! به شرط اینکه «زندگیکـردن» را بلد باشی. #روزتون_پر_از_لحظه_های_دوستداشتنی 🌱@shaadizendgi🌱
👍1👏1
#پارت۳۲ #سال_سکوت چیزی از طعم و خاص بودنش متوجه نشدم. از نظر من بستنی بود مثل بقیه بستنیها سرد و شیرین گاهی هم مغز آجیلی زیر دندان می آمد. نمیدانم! شاید افکار آشفته ام قدرت چشایی ام را ضعیف کرده بود. ولی در جواب میلاد قدردان « آره ! دستت درد نکنه » گفتم. میلاد دوباره از بستنی و تایید کسانی که اینجا را به آنها معرفی کرده بود گفت. نسترن همراهیاش کرد. من در سکوت خیابان و مردمان در حال گذر را تماشا می کردم. ولی س…
👍4😢1
🌱 تا حالا «استفراغ روانی» رو امتحان کردی؟ اسمش شاید عجیب باشه، ولی منظورش اینه که هر چیزی توی ذهنت میچرخه رو بدون سانسور روی کاغذ خالی کنی. بهترین زمانش معمولاً صبح بعد از بیدار شدن یا شب قبل از خوابه. فقط یه قلم و کاغذ بردار و هر چی به ذهنت میاد بنویس؛ بدون اینکه نگران مرتب بودن، غلط املایی یا قضاوت باشی. بعد از تموم شدن هم میتونی برگه رو پاره کنی یا دور بندازی. قرار نیست کسی اون رو بخونه. پژوهشها نشون داد…
👍2
🌱 هر صبح با یک هدف بیدار شو تصمیم بگیر که بهترین باشی بهترینِ خودت! بزرگترین رقیب امروزت، دیروزِ خودته پس سعی کن بهتر از دیروزت باشی... #روزتون_سرشار_آرامش 🌱@shaadizendgi🌱
👍2
#پارت۳۱ #سال_سکوت نگاهم به صف و میلاد که سه نفر تا خرید بستنی تعریفی اش مانده بود. گفتم: « یعنی اینجوری دیگه مهرداد بدون هیچ دردسری آزاد میشه؟» «آره » آرام نسترن را شنیدم. نگاهم به میلاد در حال گفتگو با مرد داخل صف گفتم: « اگر قبول نکنیم اون میتونه بلایی سر مهرداد بیاره » نسترن باز دستش را لای موهایش برد.« گفته که» زمزمه کرد. گفتم: « خب چرا به پلیس نمیگن؟» نسترن از گوشه چشم غضب آلود نگاهم کرد گفت: « به پلیس بگ…
👌2❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shaadizendgi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 213,963 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زندگی (سال سکوت؛ سرگذشت واقعی)” (@shaadizendgi), 918 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaadizendgi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.