Channel
@sgncapital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,588subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001368626297 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sgncapital |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sgncapital |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 3,588 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 3,594 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 3,602 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 3,604 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 42.9% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 23.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Yo ae ơi, Hiện tại Han đang có sản phẩm mới về chứng Mỹ. Ở đây có ai thích trade Chứng Khoáng Mỹ (US Equities) hoặc muốn thử nghiệm một sản phẩm mới không? Không cần KYC, 24/7 trading, deep liquidity. Nếu ae hứng thú với sản phẩm mới và thích chia sẻ (giống Kol) thì dm cho Han nhé @Han_Oyster_Call
778 là TP của lệnh long swing $BTC một tháng trước Khung lớn đi 1R 500-1k-5k không phải nghĩ Nhưng khung nhỏ thì 1R củi lửa 10-20-50$ thôi
🔥3😁1
SL scalp short $BTC
Thời gian đợi khớp 1 lệnh swing là 3 ngày TP thì lâu chứ SL mấy tí. Nhỉ !
❤1😁1
Re-entry short $BTC Out lệnh cũ Lực húng vẫn còn #DYOR
❤2👍1
Short $BTC #DYOR
😶🌫️😶🌫️😶🌫️
🤣1😁1
🪂🪂🪂🪂🪂 Cá Tháng Tư nhưng airdrop này là thật Kèo này không chỉ có airdrop… mà còn có merch độc quyền cho người nhanh nhất 🎁 👉Tham gi nhận ngay 25$ 🗓 Thời gian sự kiện: từ nay đến 08/04/2026 ✅ Hoàn thành 3 bước nhận ngay 10 USDT • Tạo tài khoản qua link mời đối tác • Nạp ròng tối thiểu 100$ • Giữ khoản nạp ròng ≥ 24 giờ và thực hiện 1 lệnh trade futures có phí 👉 15 người hoàn thành sớm nhất → nhận merch MEXC ✅ Trade…
❤1👍1
🚨 [ĐỘC QUYỀN] CƠ HỘI MUA $EDGE RẺ NHẤT CÙNG MEXC LAUNCHPAD 💥 100% người dùng MEXC được tham gia đều nhận slot >>>>>Link sự kiện Thời gian: 15:00, 24/03 Đăng ký tài khoản MEXC dưới link mời sau đây ✅ Pool người mới: ➡Đăng ký tài khoản MEXC dưới link mời đối tác & Làm theo yêu cầu 🛫Được mua EDGE với giá 0.35$ ( bằng 1/2 giá dự kiến niêm yết 0.7$) ✅ Pool người dùng hiện tại: ➡Đăng ký tài khoản MEXC dưới link mời đố…
🔥 Vàng vs Crypto sự kiện chia sẻ $1,000,000 đang diễn ra! 👉 Phần thưởng có hạn, tham gia ngay 🗓 Thời gian: 06/03/2026 – 04/04/2026 Trade 0 phí, nhận $200 vị thế FREE, stake APR tới 600% và tham gia các nhiệm vụ giao dịch để nhận thưởng. ✅ Các ưu đãi diễn ra: 1⃣Phần thưởng người mới: ✅ $200 vị thế FREE khi nạp ≥100 USDT/USDC ✅ $10 Bonus khi nạp $10 ✅ $10 Bonus khi giao dịch Spot ≥ 1,000 ✅ $3 Bonus khi giao dịch Fu…
Khi mà các sàn made in Việt Nam được phê duyệt phần nào đó lộ diện. Thì Onus out là điều được dự đoán trước, when ATX?
😁2
Scalp short #BTC Trước mắt thì húp quả +4R này đi 🍀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sgncapital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 242,548 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sgncapital named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SGN Capital Channel” (@sgncapital), 3,588 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sgncapital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.